거부처분과 신청권에 대한 고찰 = A Study on Final Agency Action of Denial and Right to Appeal

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of Administrative Litigation Act (ALA) is, through administrative litigation procedures, to protect adversely affected or aggrieved people by unlawful actions of administrative agencies or an action or inaction of public authority, and to ensure proper resolution of disputes over the rights based on public law or the application thereof (Article 1 of ALA). Unlike civil litigation that typically aims resolving a legal dispute between two or more individual parties, administrative litigation is a type of proceeding that is brought by an aggrieved party (mostly individual and weak party as opposed to administrative agency) to seek review of a decision by an agency who is a public body. Taking administrative litigation into consideration of an unlevel playing field, administrative litigation procedures is required to meet the aim and purpose provided in ALA.
Putting aside dissatisfaction of win or lose, it has been pointed out as a problem whether an aggrieved party is qualified to seek relief in the court and the matter of qualification has not been supported by people. The court has tried to loose such qualification at least in nominal by various interpretations of statutory provisions but at the same time such attempts may be subject to a criticism. It is necessary to work on fundamental review of the general rights to judicial review of agency actions.
In case where people have applied to and denied by an administrative agency, followed by filing petition to and disputing with the agency, then they seek a remedy in a court. If the court dismisses the case by saying that it is a denial of the agency but it is not a “final agency action of denial” because the petitioner has not been entitled to appeal against the agency on certain matters, or if the court accepts to decide the case by saying that it is subject to judicial review because of “social norms” (jori-sang in Korean), aggrieved people may get confused and become distrust court’s decision. What people want is to seek in a reviewing court whether agency’s action or inaction is right and legitimate because aggrieved people feel that they are penalized due to the agency’s action. The court should not underestimate people’s filings for judicial review, by reason of preventing people from abusing litigations or for the purpose of reducing trials of the administrative courts. Thus, it is not desirable for the court to continue determining qualification on whether denial of agency or final agency action of denial. Instead, it is advisable that the court allows more judicial reviews toward protecting aggrieved people’s right and interest in the nature of administrative litigation against agency.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 최민호, "환경판례백선" 한국환경법학회, 대법원 환경법연구회 2019

2 조용호, "행정판례평선" 한국행정판례연구회 2016

3 박정훈, "행정소송의 구조와 기능" 박영사 2006

4 정하중, "행정법개론" 법문사 2015

5 박균성, "행정법강의" 박영사 2019

6 김철용, "행정법 Ⅰ" 박영사 2010

7 김중권, "총장임용제청거부와 배타적 경쟁자소송- 대법원 2018. 6. 15. 선고 2016두57564 판결 -" 법조협회 68 (68): 459-477, 2019

8 최계영, "용도폐지된 공공시설에 대한 무상양도신청거부의 처분성" 행정법이론실무학회 14 : 421-442, 2005

9 홍정선, "신행정법특강" 박영사 2017

10 대법원, "사법연감"

11 노경필, "불가쟁력이 발생한 행정처분의 변경을 구할 조리상 신청권이 인정되는지 여부" 법원도서관 (68) : 2007

12 고소영, "대학의 자율성과 국립대학총장임용제도에서의 사법심사" 한국행정판례연구회 24 (24): 215-252, 2019

13 손지열, "거부처분의 행정처분성" 법원도서관 (3) : 1985

14 백윤기, "거부처분의 처분성인정요건으로서의 신청권" 행정법이론실무학회 (1) : 1997

15 이상덕, "거부처분의 처분성 인정요건으로서의 ‘신청권’ 이론에 관한 비판적 고찰" 사법발전재단 1 (1): 1053-1092, 2021

16 이은상, "거부처분에서의 신청권은 사명을 다하였는가" 행정법이론실무학회 (63) : 65-88, 2020

17 박정훈, "거부처분과 행정소송 — 도그마틱의 분별력･체계성과 다원적 비교법의 돌파력 —" 행정법이론실무학회 (63) : 1-34, 2020

18 김치환, "거부처분과 신청권" 한국행정판례연구회 23 (23): 2018

19 신상민, "處分의 變更申請權과 行政行爲의 再審査" 한국행정판례연구회 23 (23): 111-152, 2018

20 이원우, "抗告訴訟의 原告適格과 狹義의 訴의 利益 擴大를 위한 行政訴訟法 改正方案" 행정법이론실무학회 8 : 12-266, 2002

21 김중권, "國土利用計劃變更申請權의 例外的 認定의 問題點에 관한 小考" 한국행정판례연구회 10 : 21-60, 2005

22 김창조, "住民登錄番號가 意思와 無關하게 流出된 경우 條理上 住民登錄番號의 變更을 要求할 申請權의 存否" 한국행정판례연구회 23 (23): 47-91, 2018

23 정남철, "不作爲違法確認訴訟의 違法判斷 및 提訴期間" 한국행정판례연구회 17 (17): 229-270, 2012