절단장애인의 의지사용을 위한 한국어 의지평가 설문지 KPEQ(Korean-Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire)의 개발 및 타당성 검증 = Development and Validity Verification of Korean-Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (KPEQ) for Amputee`s Use of Prosthesis

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

For an objective research on the quality of life, functional mobility, and satisfaction related to Korean amputees` use of prosthesis this study aimed to develop KPEQ (Korean Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire) and to verify the validity.
To accomplish our goal, we formed a committee of 6 experts in Prosthetics and completed KPEQ through an English forward-backward translation process. We conducted two separate questionnaires on four experts and seven practitioners in related fields to review and evaluate each item and questions. Therefore, the Content validity was verified for each item and the items that were more than 80% were judged valid.
The results showed the mean content validity of the KPEQ was 0.80 ~ 0.90 in the first and 0.90 ~ 0.95 in the second. Expert group, the agreement rate increased from 0.87 to 0.90, indicating a 90%. In Practitioner group, the agreement rate was 93% from 0.87 to 0.93. The content validity of each question was 0.80 or more on average and The Delphi survey resulted that the final KPEQ was completed by revising and supplementing each question based on the opinions of experts and practitioners.
In the future, the KPEQ will be applied to the amputees and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), internal consistency (Cronbach`s α), and Bland- Altman Plots will be measured. KPEQ will be applied to many clinicians in Korea as an objective assessment questionnaire. It is expected that it will help rehabilitation of amputees.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Day, S. D., 36 (36): 173-180, 2012

2 심우섭, "편측 종아리 절단장애인에서 두 가지 소켓에 따른 사용만족도와 보행특성 비교: 단일사례연구" 특수교육재활과학연구소 54 (54): 599-613, 2015

3 한태륜, "최근 10년간 하지 절단의 원인 및 부위의 변화 양상" 대한재활의학회 28 (28): 98-103, 2004

4 김장환, "의지보조기학" 탑메디오피아 2012

5 Pezzin, L. E., "Use and satisfaction with prosthetic limb devices and related services" 85 (85): 723-729, 2004

6 Dillingham, T. R., "Use and satisfaction with prosthetic devices among persons with trauma-related amputations : a long-term outcome study" 80 (80): 563-571, 2001

7 Chang, A. M., "Translation of questionnaires and issues of equivalence" 29 (29): 316-322, 1999

8 Hurley, G. R. B., "The role of the contralateral limb in below-knee amputee gait" 14 : 33-42, 1990

9 Vildan, B., "The prosthesis evlauation questionnaire : reliability and cross-validation of the turkish version. J" 27 : 1677-1680, 2015

10 Froman, R. D., "The nursing profession: Tomorrow’s vision" Sage 397-405, 2001

11 Brita, L. N., "The locomotor capabilities index : validity and reliability of the swedish version in adults with lower limb amputation" 7 (7): 44-, 2009

12 Paradisi, F., "The conventional non articulated SACH or a multiaxial prosthetic foot for hypomobile transtibial amputees a clinical comparison on mobility, balance, and quality of life" 1-10, 2015

13 Chae, S. I., "Social science research methodology" Hak Hyun Sa 2005

14 Gremeaux, V., "Selecting a test for the clinical assessment of balance and walking capacity at the definitive fitting state after unilateral amputation : a comparative study" 36 (36): 415-422, 2012

15 Resnik, L., "Reliability of outcome measures for people with lower limb amputations : distinguishing true change from statistical error" 91 (91): 555-565, 2011

16 Ali, S., "Qualitative study of prosthetic suspension system on transtibial amputees’satisfaction and perceived problems with their prosthetic devices" 935 (935): 1919-1923, 2012

17 Legro, M. W., "Prosthesis evaluation questionnaire for persons with lower limb amputations : assessing prosthesis-related quality of life" 79 (79): 931-938, 1998

18 Smith, D. G., "Phantom limb, residual limb, and back pain after lower extremity amputation" 361 : 29-38, 1999

19 Ferriero, G., "Measuring long-term outcome in people with lower limb amputation: cross-validation of the italian versions of the prosthetic profile of the amputee and prosthesis evaluation questionnaire" 30 : 1-6, 1994

20 Miller, W. C., "Lower extremity prosthetic mobility : a comparison of 3 self-report scales" 82 (82): 1432-1440, 2001

21 Miller, W. C., "Lower extremity prosthetic mobility : a comparison of 3 self-report scales" 84 (84): 656-661, 2001

22 Delbecq, A. L., "Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nomial group and Delphi processes" Scott, Foresman and Company 1975

23 Lynn, M. R., "Determination and quantification of content validity" 35 (35): 382-385, 1986

24 Guillemin, F., "Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures : literature review and proposed guidelines" 46 (46): 1417-1432, 1993

25 Sarah, Jane. Day, "Cross cultural equivalence testing of the Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire(PEQ)for an Arabic speaking population" 36 (36): 173-180, 2012

26 Ehde, D. M., "Chronic pain management, In: Atlas of amputations and limb deficiencies" American Academy Orthopaedic Surgeons 589-619, 2004

27 Brislin, R. W., "Back-translation for cross-cultural research" 1 (1): 185-216, 1970

28 Gailey, R. S., "Atlas of amputations and limb deficiencies" American academy orthopaedic surgeons 711-726, 2004

29 김성희, "2014년 장애인 실태조사" 한국보건사회연구원 2014

30 김성희, "2011년 장애인 실태조사" 한국보건사회연구원 2011