RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    美國聯邦大法院의 役割에 관한 分析 硏究 = The Role of the Supreme Court in American Governmental Process

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A2068840

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Alexis de Tocqueville observed that scarcely any political question arises in the United States that is not resolved, sooner or later, into a judicial question. The statement is equally true today. It is well known that American government is so called judiociocracy or governmern by judges and the Supreme Court is a third chamber of the legislature.
    Judge-made law plays a much larger part in the government of the American people than of the British. American judges are less attentive to the letter of the law or to precedent. They move freely in wider orbits. Both bench and bar make greater use of stat istical and other social studies, and the line between law and policy is often blured. These characteristics reach their peak in constitutional adjudication by the Supreme Court of the United States and the inferior federal courts.
    The author's aims in these articles about constitutional adjudication are three:
    The first is to indicate the kinds of questions with which the Supreme Court dleals and extent of the constitutional protection accorded individuals and minorities.
    The second purpose is to inquire into the uses and abuses of constitutional adjudication as an instrument of social policy. Here the emphasis will be less on results than on the proper institutional limits of the judicial function.
    The third, the article inquire into the sources of the legitimacy of the Supreme Court's constitutional decisions.
    These three purposes underlie all this article and Contents of this article are as follows

    Ⅰ. Introduction
    Ⅱ. The Court's role in Governmental Process.
    Ⅲ. The Court's role in Garantee of Individual Liberty
    1. In troductory
    2. The Court's and Individual Liberty
    3. Equality and the Constitution.
    Ⅳ. The Affirmative duties of Government
    Ⅴ. Summary and Couclusion.
    번역하기

    Alexis de Tocqueville observed that scarcely any political question arises in the United States that is not resolved, sooner or later, into a judicial question. The statement is equally true today. It is well known that American government is so calle...

    Alexis de Tocqueville observed that scarcely any political question arises in the United States that is not resolved, sooner or later, into a judicial question. The statement is equally true today. It is well known that American government is so called judiociocracy or governmern by judges and the Supreme Court is a third chamber of the legislature.
    Judge-made law plays a much larger part in the government of the American people than of the British. American judges are less attentive to the letter of the law or to precedent. They move freely in wider orbits. Both bench and bar make greater use of stat istical and other social studies, and the line between law and policy is often blured. These characteristics reach their peak in constitutional adjudication by the Supreme Court of the United States and the inferior federal courts.
    The author's aims in these articles about constitutional adjudication are three:
    The first is to indicate the kinds of questions with which the Supreme Court dleals and extent of the constitutional protection accorded individuals and minorities.
    The second purpose is to inquire into the uses and abuses of constitutional adjudication as an instrument of social policy. Here the emphasis will be less on results than on the proper institutional limits of the judicial function.
    The third, the article inquire into the sources of the legitimacy of the Supreme Court's constitutional decisions.
    These three purposes underlie all this article and Contents of this article are as follows

    Ⅰ. Introduction
    Ⅱ. The Court's role in Governmental Process.
    Ⅲ. The Court's role in Garantee of Individual Liberty
    1. In troductory
    2. The Court's and Individual Liberty
    3. Equality and the Constitution.
    Ⅳ. The Affirmative duties of Government
    Ⅴ. Summary and Couclusion.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 問題의 所在
    • Ⅱ. 統治體制에 있어서의 役割
    • Ⅲ.·基本權 保障에 있어서의 役割
    • 1.人權保障의 由來
    • 2.個人的 自由保障
    • Ⅰ. 問題의 所在
    • Ⅱ. 統治體制에 있어서의 役割
    • Ⅲ.·基本權 保障에 있어서의 役割
    • 1.人權保障의 由來
    • 2.個人的 自由保障
    • 3.平等保障
    • Ⅳ. 行政府의 積極的 義務
    • Ⅴ. 要約 및 結論
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼