RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Humane Entrepreneurship and Strategies for Countries by Performance and Economic Development

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106076275

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study compares perceptions of humane entrepreneurship, the pursuit of entrepreneurial growth and humane development for opportunity realization and sustainable organization (White Book, 2016), among 19 countries and provides suggestions for high and balanced entrepreneurial culture in each country. To measure humane entrepreneurship, 10Es were used: empowerment, ethics, equality, engagement, ecosystem, envisioning, enthusiasm, enlightenment, experimentation, and excellence. To enable country-by-country, gap analysis was used for elements of humane entrepreneurship and it was found that enterprise cycle, humane cycle and humane entrepreneurship score were different between innovation-driven country group and other country group. For Korea, performance ratios drop abruptly when we move from enterprise cycle to humane cycle. To invigorate the entrepreneurial ecosystem, both enterprise cycle and human cycle are necessary and balance between humane cycle and enterprise cycle is important.
      Next this paper executed importance-performance analysis (IPA) to provide suggestions for humane entrepreneurship strategy to fill the gap in each country. Overall, enlightenment and enthusiasm were classified as ‘keep up the good work’ category, while empowerment and ethics were recommended to ‘concentrate on’. Engagement was also important to ‘keep or concentrate’.
      Ecosystem and equality were perceived as ‘low priority’. IPA patterns were different between groups with high and low level of gap and/or performance ratio. In top six country group, empowerment and enthusiasm were important. In bottom six country group, empowerment and ethics were perceived to deserve concentration and enlightenment was considered important to keep current level. This study also found distinctive IPA patterns in innovation-driven economy and efficiency-driven economy respectively. People in the efficiency-driven economy perceived enlightenment as ‘keep up the good work’, empowerment and ethics as ‘to concentrate here’, and ecosystem and equality as ‘low priority’.
      For countries in the innovation-driven stage, ‘keep up’ for enthusiasm and ‘concentrate’ for empowerment were recommended but ecosystem was considered to have ‘low priority’. Lastly, theoretical and practical implications and research directions will be discussed.
      번역하기

      This study compares perceptions of humane entrepreneurship, the pursuit of entrepreneurial growth and humane development for opportunity realization and sustainable organization (White Book, 2016), among 19 countries and provides suggestions for high ...

      This study compares perceptions of humane entrepreneurship, the pursuit of entrepreneurial growth and humane development for opportunity realization and sustainable organization (White Book, 2016), among 19 countries and provides suggestions for high and balanced entrepreneurial culture in each country. To measure humane entrepreneurship, 10Es were used: empowerment, ethics, equality, engagement, ecosystem, envisioning, enthusiasm, enlightenment, experimentation, and excellence. To enable country-by-country, gap analysis was used for elements of humane entrepreneurship and it was found that enterprise cycle, humane cycle and humane entrepreneurship score were different between innovation-driven country group and other country group. For Korea, performance ratios drop abruptly when we move from enterprise cycle to humane cycle. To invigorate the entrepreneurial ecosystem, both enterprise cycle and human cycle are necessary and balance between humane cycle and enterprise cycle is important.
      Next this paper executed importance-performance analysis (IPA) to provide suggestions for humane entrepreneurship strategy to fill the gap in each country. Overall, enlightenment and enthusiasm were classified as ‘keep up the good work’ category, while empowerment and ethics were recommended to ‘concentrate on’. Engagement was also important to ‘keep or concentrate’.
      Ecosystem and equality were perceived as ‘low priority’. IPA patterns were different between groups with high and low level of gap and/or performance ratio. In top six country group, empowerment and enthusiasm were important. In bottom six country group, empowerment and ethics were perceived to deserve concentration and enlightenment was considered important to keep current level. This study also found distinctive IPA patterns in innovation-driven economy and efficiency-driven economy respectively. People in the efficiency-driven economy perceived enlightenment as ‘keep up the good work’, empowerment and ethics as ‘to concentrate here’, and ecosystem and equality as ‘low priority’.
      For countries in the innovation-driven stage, ‘keep up’ for enthusiasm and ‘concentrate’ for empowerment were recommended but ecosystem was considered to have ‘low priority’. Lastly, theoretical and practical implications and research directions will be discussed.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이대희, "한국기업의 경영혁신역량과 기업가 정신이 기업의 경영성과에 미치는 영향" 한국기업경영학회 23 (23): 127-149, 2016

      2 이재은, "청소년의 기업가정신이 창업의지에 미치는 영향: 사회적 지원세력의 조절효과를 중심으로" 한국생산성학회 31 (31): 113-141, 2017

      3 이덕훈, "전후 일본 철강업의 발전과 기업가 정신에 대한 고찰 -철강업 발전(1950-90)과 성장요인을 중심으로-" 대한경영학회 15 (15): 213-233, 2002

      4 정대용, "시장정보와 경영성과간에 기업가정신의 매개역할에 관한 연구" 대한경영학회 22 (22): 1749-1775, 2009

      5 Latham, G. P., "Work motivation theory and research at the dawn of the twenty-first century" 56 (56): 485-516, 2005

      6 Phillips, R., "What stakeholder theory is not" 13 (13): 479-502, 2003

      7 Husted, B. W., "Wealth, culture, and corruption" 30 (30): 339-359, 1999

      8 Stone, A. G., "Transformational versus servant leadership: A difference in leader focus" 25 (25): 349-361, 2004

      9 Parente, R., "The epistemology of humane entrepreneurship: Theory and proposal for future research agenda" 56 (56): 30-52, 2018

      10 김용진, "The Impact of Humane Entrepreneurship on Business Ecosystem and Economic Development" 한국중소기업학회 20 (20): 3-10, 2018

      1 이대희, "한국기업의 경영혁신역량과 기업가 정신이 기업의 경영성과에 미치는 영향" 한국기업경영학회 23 (23): 127-149, 2016

      2 이재은, "청소년의 기업가정신이 창업의지에 미치는 영향: 사회적 지원세력의 조절효과를 중심으로" 한국생산성학회 31 (31): 113-141, 2017

      3 이덕훈, "전후 일본 철강업의 발전과 기업가 정신에 대한 고찰 -철강업 발전(1950-90)과 성장요인을 중심으로-" 대한경영학회 15 (15): 213-233, 2002

      4 정대용, "시장정보와 경영성과간에 기업가정신의 매개역할에 관한 연구" 대한경영학회 22 (22): 1749-1775, 2009

      5 Latham, G. P., "Work motivation theory and research at the dawn of the twenty-first century" 56 (56): 485-516, 2005

      6 Phillips, R., "What stakeholder theory is not" 13 (13): 479-502, 2003

      7 Husted, B. W., "Wealth, culture, and corruption" 30 (30): 339-359, 1999

      8 Stone, A. G., "Transformational versus servant leadership: A difference in leader focus" 25 (25): 349-361, 2004

      9 Parente, R., "The epistemology of humane entrepreneurship: Theory and proposal for future research agenda" 56 (56): 30-52, 2018

      10 김용진, "The Impact of Humane Entrepreneurship on Business Ecosystem and Economic Development" 한국중소기업학회 20 (20): 3-10, 2018

      11 Kuratko, D. F., "Strategic entrepreneurship: Exploring different perspectives of an emerging concept" 33 (33): 1-17, 2009

      12 Parasuraman, A., "SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring customer perceptions of service quality" 64 (64): 12-40, 1988

      13 Stevenson, H. H., "New Business Venture and the Entrepreneur" Irwin 1985

      14 Stevenson, H., "New Business Venture and the Entrepreneur" Harvard Business School 1984

      15 김기찬, "International Comparison of Humane Entrepreneurship: Status, Typology and Policy Implications" 한국중소기업학회 20 (20): 23-32, 2018

      16 Hicks, H. A., "Indulgence, restraint, and within-country diversity: Exploring entrepreneurial outcomes with new constructs" 2015

      17 Martilla, J., "Importance-performance analysis" 41 (41): 77-79, 1977

      18 Kartajaya, H., "Humane entrepreneurship: Inspired by marketing 3.0" 2016

      19 Kim, K.-C., "Humane entrepreneurship: How focusing on people can drive a new era of wealth and quality job creation in a sustainable world" 56 (56): 10-29, 2018

      20 배종태, "Humane Entrepreneurship: Theoretical Foundations and Conceptual Development" 한국중소기업학회 20 (20): 11-21, 2018

      21 White Book, "Humane Entrepreneruship"

      22 Kim, K.-C., "Global survey: Humane entrepreneurship" 2016

      23 Kim, K.-C., "Flourishing enterprises with humane entrepreneurship: Theory and practice" 2016

      24 Kuratko, D. F., "Entrepreneurial leadership in the 21st century" 13 (13): 1-11, 2007

      25 Carree, M. A., "Economic development and business ownership: An analysis using data of 23 OECD countries in the period 1976-1996" 19 (19): 271-290, 2002

      26 Shane, S., "Cultural influences on national rates of innovation" 8 (8): 59-73, 1993

      27 Burns, P., "Corporate entrepreneurship: Innovation and Strategy in Large Organizations" Palgrave Macmillan 2012

      28 Boag, D. A., "Analysis of marketing activities in high-technology manufacturing companies" 4 (4): 48-56, 1986

      29 Spitzeck, H., "An integrated model of humanistic management" 99 (99): 51-62, 2011

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-01-14 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korea Journal of Business Administration -> Korean Journal of Business Administration KCI등재
      2014-01-09 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korea Journal of Business Administration KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-05-30 학회명변경 영문명 : Daehan Association Of Business Administration Korea (Daba) -> DAEHAN Association of Business Administration, Korea (DABA) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.26 1.26 1.44
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.53 1.53 2.107 0.23
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼