RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      생성형 인공지능의 한국어 오류 인식 및 수정 성능 분석 - 통사 오류 판단 능력을 중심으로 - = A Study of Generative AI’s Capability in Detecting and Correcting Korean Language Errors - Focusing on Syntactic Error -

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109898965

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study investigates the potential and limitations of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in Korean language education by evaluating how well current models identify and correct syntactic errors made by learners. Multilingual models (ChatGPT, Claude) and Korean-specific models (EXAONE, QwenKO) were tested using a learner corpus. The results revealed notable performance differences. EXAONE showed high accuracy in error detection, highlighting the strengths of Korean-focused models, but its performance in error correction was limited and inconsistent across error types. Claude and GPT demonstrated more balanced results, particularly in rewriting corrected sentences, while QwenKO showed generally low accuracy. Overall, Korean-specific models excelled in identifying errors, whereas larger multilingual models performed better in sentence-level correction. All models struggled with errors requiring contextual or pragmatic understanding, suggesting that current AI systems still lack discourse-level competence. This study provides empirical insight into the capabilities of generative AI for syntactic error processing and offers pedagogical considerations for its informed application in Korean language instruction.
      번역하기

      This study investigates the potential and limitations of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in Korean language education by evaluating how well current models identify and correct syntactic errors made by learners. Multilingual models (ChatGPT, C...

      This study investigates the potential and limitations of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in Korean language education by evaluating how well current models identify and correct syntactic errors made by learners. Multilingual models (ChatGPT, Claude) and Korean-specific models (EXAONE, QwenKO) were tested using a learner corpus. The results revealed notable performance differences. EXAONE showed high accuracy in error detection, highlighting the strengths of Korean-focused models, but its performance in error correction was limited and inconsistent across error types. Claude and GPT demonstrated more balanced results, particularly in rewriting corrected sentences, while QwenKO showed generally low accuracy. Overall, Korean-specific models excelled in identifying errors, whereas larger multilingual models performed better in sentence-level correction. All models struggled with errors requiring contextual or pragmatic understanding, suggesting that current AI systems still lack discourse-level competence. This study provides empirical insight into the capabilities of generative AI for syntactic error processing and offers pedagogical considerations for its informed application in Korean language instruction.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼