RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      전자문서의 소송상 의의(意義) = The Legal Essay on the Electronic Documents in Civil Procedure

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109589645

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Traditionally, the medium for recording and transmitting thoughts has been a tangible object: paper. With the development of science and technology, electronic documents are interpreted as tangible documents, even without the mediation of paper, as intangible information. Therefore, it must be said that the concept of an electronic document is only possible through legislation and is difficult to achieve through pure legal interpretation.
      Korea has transformed intangible ‘information’ into ‘electronic documents,’ which are treated as tangible objects through legislation, and such examples do not exist in Germany or Japan. Korea might be the world's first in this field, befitting its reputation as an IT powerhouse.
      Following the introduction, this paper discusses the concept of electronic documents, their legal nature, and their significance in litigation. In developing this paper, I reviewed Japanese Civil Procedure Act and German Civil Procedure Act to examine the differences with our country. In the process, I explained that while electronic documents and video pleadings have been fully legislated in Korea, allowing parties to proceed with litigation through electronic documents without appearing in court, Germany has video pleadings but lacks legal measures for electronic documents. In Japan, neither electronic documents nor video pleadings have been legislated, requiring parties to appear in court physically, indicating that, in terms of e-litigation procedures, Japan is less advanced than Korea.
      Ultimately, I concluded that this accomplishments is because the best talents in our country have concentrated in the judiciary since liberation.
      번역하기

      Traditionally, the medium for recording and transmitting thoughts has been a tangible object: paper. With the development of science and technology, electronic documents are interpreted as tangible documents, even without the mediation of paper, as in...

      Traditionally, the medium for recording and transmitting thoughts has been a tangible object: paper. With the development of science and technology, electronic documents are interpreted as tangible documents, even without the mediation of paper, as intangible information. Therefore, it must be said that the concept of an electronic document is only possible through legislation and is difficult to achieve through pure legal interpretation.
      Korea has transformed intangible ‘information’ into ‘electronic documents,’ which are treated as tangible objects through legislation, and such examples do not exist in Germany or Japan. Korea might be the world's first in this field, befitting its reputation as an IT powerhouse.
      Following the introduction, this paper discusses the concept of electronic documents, their legal nature, and their significance in litigation. In developing this paper, I reviewed Japanese Civil Procedure Act and German Civil Procedure Act to examine the differences with our country. In the process, I explained that while electronic documents and video pleadings have been fully legislated in Korea, allowing parties to proceed with litigation through electronic documents without appearing in court, Germany has video pleadings but lacks legal measures for electronic documents. In Japan, neither electronic documents nor video pleadings have been legislated, requiring parties to appear in court physically, indicating that, in terms of e-litigation procedures, Japan is less advanced than Korea.
      Ultimately, I concluded that this accomplishments is because the best talents in our country have concentrated in the judiciary since liberation.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼