RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      1960∼1970년대 유사역사학의 식민사학 프레임 창조와 그 확산 = Making and Spreading of Historiography of Colonialism Frame in the 1960s∼1970s

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Pseudohistory in Korea originated in the colonial era. Turanism was an ideology introduced into Korea in the era. Influenced by it, Choy Dong published _The Ancient history of Korean Peoples(조선상고민족사)_ in 1966. It is common practice to stimulate a nationalism by capitalizing on a mythology in the initial stage of a modern nation. Turanism was an ideology manipulated for nationalism as well. Turanism was propagated to colonial Joseon by Japanese army colonel Kaneko Teiichi. Turanism was an ideological base of the ‘Pan-Asiatic Society’. During the colonial era, Joseon was subordinate to Japan, the main agent. The perspective shifted when Korea had been liberated; Japan is located in the position being subordinate to the main agent Korea. Choy was in a pro-Japanese group. Moon Jeong-chang, also in the group, was greatly influenced by Choy. Moon criticized that Korean historical academia imitate the approach that Japanese historians of Japanese Empire had formulated. The criticism was chiefly concentrated on Lee Byung-do, most famous historian at the period. The content of it was predominantly inaccurate and construed maliciously. An Ho-sang, served as the first minister of education of Korea, was one of the public figures influenced by Moon. An and Moon organized ‘Finding National History Counsil(국사찾기협의회)’ and utilized a monthly journal _Ja-yu_ as an organ. They persistently had capitalized _Ja-yu_ on criticizing that Korean historians are deferring to the historiography of colonialism, a Japanese imperial view of the history. In 1974, ‘the national history textbook(국정 국사 교과서)’ was published. Pseudohistorians reprehended it intensely. They assumed that they could indoctrinate general citizens if ‘the national history textbook’ is stated in their opinion. Their opinion corresponded with a nationalistic president Park Chung-hee regime. Some of the books published from ROK army headquarters had included a pseudohistorical view as well. In consequence of continuous activities of pseudohistorians, general citizens have a misapprehension of them having succeeded a national history of the colonial era. Korean historians have to eliminate this misapprehension. Breaking a ‘Korean historical academia= historiography of colonialism’ formula, a frame invented by pseudohistorians, would be its first step.
      번역하기

      Pseudohistory in Korea originated in the colonial era. Turanism was an ideology introduced into Korea in the era. Influenced by it, Choy Dong published _The Ancient history of Korean Peoples(조선상고민족사)_ in 1966. It is common practice to st...

      Pseudohistory in Korea originated in the colonial era. Turanism was an ideology introduced into Korea in the era. Influenced by it, Choy Dong published _The Ancient history of Korean Peoples(조선상고민족사)_ in 1966. It is common practice to stimulate a nationalism by capitalizing on a mythology in the initial stage of a modern nation. Turanism was an ideology manipulated for nationalism as well. Turanism was propagated to colonial Joseon by Japanese army colonel Kaneko Teiichi. Turanism was an ideological base of the ‘Pan-Asiatic Society’. During the colonial era, Joseon was subordinate to Japan, the main agent. The perspective shifted when Korea had been liberated; Japan is located in the position being subordinate to the main agent Korea. Choy was in a pro-Japanese group. Moon Jeong-chang, also in the group, was greatly influenced by Choy. Moon criticized that Korean historical academia imitate the approach that Japanese historians of Japanese Empire had formulated. The criticism was chiefly concentrated on Lee Byung-do, most famous historian at the period. The content of it was predominantly inaccurate and construed maliciously. An Ho-sang, served as the first minister of education of Korea, was one of the public figures influenced by Moon. An and Moon organized ‘Finding National History Counsil(국사찾기협의회)’ and utilized a monthly journal _Ja-yu_ as an organ. They persistently had capitalized _Ja-yu_ on criticizing that Korean historians are deferring to the historiography of colonialism, a Japanese imperial view of the history. In 1974, ‘the national history textbook(국정 국사 교과서)’ was published. Pseudohistorians reprehended it intensely. They assumed that they could indoctrinate general citizens if ‘the national history textbook’ is stated in their opinion. Their opinion corresponded with a nationalistic president Park Chung-hee regime. Some of the books published from ROK army headquarters had included a pseudohistorical view as well. In consequence of continuous activities of pseudohistorians, general citizens have a misapprehension of them having succeeded a national history of the colonial era. Korean historians have to eliminate this misapprehension. Breaking a ‘Korean historical academia= historiography of colonialism’ formula, a frame invented by pseudohistorians, would be its first step.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼