단군 인식의 계보와 대종교 『증보문헌비고』·『단조사고』·『신단실기』를 중심으로 = The Daejonggyo and Its’ Understanding on the Dangun －In the Jeungbomunheonbigo, Dangigosa and Sindansilgi

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The study explored understanding the Dangun in academic works during late Chosun and the Japanese Colonization periods. The recognition of the Dangun as the progenitor of Korean people and founder of the nation was formed during the late Chosun and the Japanese colonization periods, with unclear historical understandings. As the need for the new modern nation arose due to internal and external crisis to the Daehan Empire, as well as modern Western culture, the Dangun gained spotlight as the symbol of national identity and fate of the national community. With such understanding, historical narrations on the Dangun was also empowered than the past; one case of such empowerment is the _Jeungbomunheonbigo_ published in the year 1908, during the Daehan Empire period. _Experts in history, culture, and rituals, including Kim Gyo-heon, Kim Taek-yeong, Jang Ji-yeon, Lee Beom-se, and Yoon Hee-gu, participated in the publication of the _Jeungbomunheonbigo_, enriching the narratives of the Dangun with articles of tombs, graves, personal history, epics, and poetries of the Dangun. Kim Gyo-heon, editor and collector for the _Jeungbomunheonbigo_, joined the religion of the Daejonggyo in 1910. Kim, with experiences in publication of the book, rendered himself to the collection and edition of articles and books related to the Dangun, to provide historical basis of his religion. In this regard, he published the Danjosago in 1911, followed by the Sindansilgi in 1914. The Danjosago is a collection of documentations on Dangun, as the first historical text that revealed historical awareness by the Daejonggyo on the Dangun as the religious figure.
The Sindansilgi, inheriting the historical awareness and documentations of the Danjosago, describes the history of the Dangun in more objective manner, adopting historical texts like the Dongsagangmok and Yeolha-ilgi. The Sindansilgi is the first history book for the general public that revealed historical awareness of the Daejonggyo, affecting the intellectual strata of the era. Despite the achievements, however, the two books have grave errors as historical publications : In order to deify the Dangun as the origin of the Korean people, the two books adopted several articles under suspicion of fabrication. The historical narrative may not be as nonsensical as the 'Three Pseudographs', the _Gyuwonsahwa_, _Dangigosa_, or the _Hwandangogi_, it should be pointed out that the two books did adopt documentations with unclear origin, or under suspicion of fabrication. Although the Daejonggyo has nothing to do with the Three Pseudographs, such errors in the two books provided false claims that the religion supported the contents of the Three Pseudographs.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 정영훈, "한국사 속에서의 “檀君民族主義”와 그 정치적 성격" 28 (28): 1995

2 정요근, "청산되어야 할 적폐, 국수주의 유사 역사학" 한국역사연구회 (105) : 3-20, 2017

3 유영인, "대종교원전자료집 백봉전집" 역사공간 2017

4 김성환, "단군전승의 양상을 통해본 『규원사화』의 자료적 성격" 대동문화연구원 (86) : 299-332, 2014

5 이민원, "근대 학설사 속의 ‘단군민족주의’" 한국사상문화학회 (72) : 237-262, 2014

6 고병철, "근대 단군 담론의 종교사적 의미" 한국정신문화연구원 한국학대학원 2001

7 고병철, "근대 단군 담론의 이해－종교적 신념체계와 역사적 지식체계로의 형성" 21 : 2009

8 조준희, "근대 檀君大皇祖 용어의 출현과 확산에 대한 민족사적 고찰" 11 : 2006

9 김성환, "高麗時代의 檀君傳承과 認識" 경인문화사 2002

10 "高宗實錄"

11 조인성, "韓末 檀君關係史書의 再檢討－『신단실기』·『단기고사』·『환단고기』를 중심으로" 3 : 1989

12 鄭立菲, "韓末 檀君神話의 再發見과 民族 正體性의 構築" 한국학중앙연구원 한국학대학원 2014

13 한영우, "韓國民族主義歷史學" 일조각 1994

14 "重齋先生文集"

15 "神檀實記"

16 "皇城新聞"

17 "檀祖事攷"

18 "東史年表"

19 오영섭, "朝鮮光文會 硏究" 한국사학사학회 (3) : 79-140, 2001

20 "增補文獻備考"

21 정구복, "『문헌비고』의 자료적 성격과 사학사적 의미" 진단학회 (106) : 167-190, 2008

22 조인성, "『규원사화(揆園史話)』·『단기고사(檀奇古史)』·『환단고기(桓檀古記)』 위서론의 성과와 과제" 동북아역사재단 (55) : 263-305, 2017

23 정욱재, "『檀祖事攷』 저술에 관한 검토" 한국사학사학회 (12) : 117-154, 2005

24 정욱재, "『東史年表』의 간행과 그 의미" 9 : 2003

25 "『大倧敎重光六十年史』, 大倧敎總本司"

26 정욱재, "‘나철 친필본’의 출현과 의의―「離世歌(세상떠나는노래)」·「殉命三條」·「거듭빛노래(重光歌)」" 역사문제연구소 16 (16): 301-320, 2012