의존명사 “것”의 스페인어 번역 오류 유형 분석과 해결안 모색 = Analysis of error types in translating the Korean bound noun “kes” into Spanish and solution to the problems

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper deals with the question of translating the Korean bound noun ``kes`` into Spanish. This bound noun plays several syntactic-semantic roles and each of them must be realized as a different form in Spanish. However, a lot of Korean students tend to consider the free relative pronoun ``lo que`` as the only counterpart of ``kes``. Owing to this, the error rate is very high, which is predicted by the grammatical hierarchy in six categories of difficulty(Prator, 1967). Thus, the aim of this paper is to provide a practical solution to this problem. Firstly, we present several syntactic-semantic roles that ``kes`` plays in Korean. Secondly, we show six most common errors. Thirdly, we analyse the causes of each error and then claim that ``kes`` can be translated as ``lo que`` only if it appears in free relative clauses. Finally, we provide some practical solutions which can be used helpfully to prevent or reduce errors.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 최규일, "현대 국어의 ‘것’ 연구" 51 : 297-319, 1985

2 양성혜, "한국어 관형절 ‘(으/느)ㄴ + 명사’ 구문의 스페인어 번역시 발생하는 오류의 분석과 오류 예방 방안" 한국스페인어문학회 52 (52): 237-257, 2009

3 최규일, "한국어 {것}의 사용과 의미기능" 50 : 63-127, 1993

4 고영근, "표준 국어문법론" 탑출판사 1997

5 고영근, "우리말 문법론" 집문당 2008

6 심상완, "외국어 학습에서의 생성문법의 적용-스페인어 학습 사례를 중심으로-" 한국언어과학회 11 (11): 87-110, 2004

7 심상완, "스페인어 비교 구문 도출 과정 규명과 학습에서의 활용 가능성에 관하여 - 영어, 한국어와의 비교 연구 -" 한국스페인어문학회 36 (36): 409-426, 2005

8 이정식, "순행, 역행 상승: 국어 ‘것’ 내부분열문" 한국현대언어학회 25 (25): 757-776, 2010

9 Shim, S. W., "Spanish does not have cleft sentences" 18 : 227-262, 2009

10 김종복, "Some Remarks on Korean Nominalizer kes and Information Structure" 한국생성문법학회 17 (17): 479-494, 2007

11 Kang, B. -S., "Some Peculiarities of Korean Kes Cleft Constructions" 60 : 251-281, 2006

12 심상완, "Pro-drop에 대한 비교 분석" 14 : 113-132, 2004

13 Bošković, Z., "On Peudoclefts" 51 : 235-277, 1997

14 Comrie, B., "Language universals and linguistic typology" University of Chicago 1989

15 Brucart, J. M., "La estructura del sintagma nominal: las oraciones del relativo, In Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española" Espasa 395-522, 1999

16 Kim, M. -J., "Internally Headed Relatives Instantiate Situation Subordination"

17 Prator, C., "Hierarchy of difficulty" University of California 1967

18 Jhang, S. -E., "Headed Nominalisation in Korean: relative clauses and comparative" Simon Frase University 1994

19 Bosque, I., "Fundamentos de sintaxis formal" Akal 2009

20 Gutiérrez, S., "Estructuras comparativas" Arco/Libros, S. L 1994

21 김종복, "A Phrasal Analysis of Korean Comparatives" 한국생성문법학회 20 (20): 179-205, 2010