RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      국어 통합합성어 형성 원리 연구 -신어 분석을 기반으로- = A Study on the Formation of Synthetic Compounds in Corean

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60118385

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper argues that synthetic compounds in Korean are formed in the syntax, following the approach of the Distributed Morphology. Synthetic compounds are derived in the syntax like their syntactic counterparts. What they differ depends on the merge site of a nominalizing functional category. The nominalizing functional category merges with a root phrase in the case of synthetic compounds whereas it takes a vP in syntactic counterparts. This approach can explain not only existing synthetic compounds but newly coined ones in Korean. Synthetic compounds in Korean exhibit certain syntactic relationships between their preceding noun constituents and the verbal roots. That is, the preceding noun constituents are internal arguments or adjuncts of the verbal roots, but cannot be external arguments. This can be explained by the analysis that a noun constituent and its verbal root of a synthetic compound constitute one root phrase before the merge of the nominalizing functional category, thereby excluding an external argument inside it.
      번역하기

      This paper argues that synthetic compounds in Korean are formed in the syntax, following the approach of the Distributed Morphology. Synthetic compounds are derived in the syntax like their syntactic counterparts. What they differ depends on the merge...

      This paper argues that synthetic compounds in Korean are formed in the syntax, following the approach of the Distributed Morphology. Synthetic compounds are derived in the syntax like their syntactic counterparts. What they differ depends on the merge site of a nominalizing functional category. The nominalizing functional category merges with a root phrase in the case of synthetic compounds whereas it takes a vP in syntactic counterparts. This approach can explain not only existing synthetic compounds but newly coined ones in Korean. Synthetic compounds in Korean exhibit certain syntactic relationships between their preceding noun constituents and the verbal roots. That is, the preceding noun constituents are internal arguments or adjuncts of the verbal roots, but cannot be external arguments. This can be explained by the analysis that a noun constituent and its verbal root of a synthetic compound constitute one root phrase before the merge of the nominalizing functional category, thereby excluding an external argument inside it.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼