RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    物件의 發明ㆍ方法의 發明 : 分類基準과 適用

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101888202

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    An invention is generally classified into either product-invention or process-invention under Korean Patent Law. The category in which an invention is classified is of critical importance, for the scope of enforcement of patented invention is significantly changed depending on the category of the invention. The criterion for the classification has been closely related to element of time such as lapse of time in the invention. In this article, the rationale of the classification is critically reviewed and a new and unambiguous criterion for the classification is suggested based on the essential characteristics of the classification. Application of the suggested criterion, occupancy of space disregarding the scale of the occupancy, to invention related to computer program shows that computer program can be classified into product-invention so long as the computer program is intended for the operation of a computer and the computer program is consisted of physical entities.
    번역하기

    An invention is generally classified into either product-invention or process-invention under Korean Patent Law. The category in which an invention is classified is of critical importance, for the scope of enforcement of patented invention is signific...

    An invention is generally classified into either product-invention or process-invention under Korean Patent Law. The category in which an invention is classified is of critical importance, for the scope of enforcement of patented invention is significantly changed depending on the category of the invention. The criterion for the classification has been closely related to element of time such as lapse of time in the invention. In this article, the rationale of the classification is critically reviewed and a new and unambiguous criterion for the classification is suggested based on the essential characteristics of the classification. Application of the suggested criterion, occupancy of space disregarding the scale of the occupancy, to invention related to computer program shows that computer program can be classified into product-invention so long as the computer program is intended for the operation of a computer and the computer program is consisted of physical entities.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • I. 서론
    • II. 발명의 분류
    • 1. 물건의 발명 · 방법의 발명
    • 2. 구분의 의의
    • III. 분류의 기준
    • I. 서론
    • II. 발명의 분류
    • 1. 물건의 발명 · 방법의 발명
    • 2. 구분의 의의
    • III. 분류의 기준
    • 1. 학설 및 판례
    • 2. 후험적 분류
    • IV. 결론
    • 참고문헌
    • Abstract
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼