RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    생태계에 대한 학습발달과정의 개발과 평가 = Developing and Assessing a Learning Progression for the Ecosystem

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    There have been much efforts to reconstruct the science curriculum focusing on Disciplinary Core Ideas(DCI) in many countries such as America and Europe, the most practical effort has been to design a curriculum with learning progressions(LPs). LPs describe stepwise how students can systematically move toward the understanding of more sophisticated ideas or scientific activities and explain in succession the process of understanding the ideas while the students learn. In this study, a LP for ecosystems has been developed, and the developed LP is then evaluated accordingly. The Ecosystem is one of the DCI of the life science in Next Generation Science Standards(NGSS). The development process of the LP was set at step 4(Development, Assessment, Analysis, and Amendment), and developed through an iterative process of sequences. As a result of analyzing the developed LP, an assessment based on the LP provides reliable information to identifying student ability. This study proposes the development process of the LP and its methodological aspects to use Core Achievement Standards, Ordered Multiple-Choice items and the Rasch model. In addition, using the empirically proven LP suggests a way of strengthening curriculum linked to educational content, teaching methods and assessment. Utilizing the proposed development process in this study will be to present the standard into the direction of becoming part of the curriculum. Currently, the state of domestic research for the LP is still lacking. This study determined the development process of the LP and the need to conduct future research on the LPs.
    번역하기

    There have been much efforts to reconstruct the science curriculum focusing on Disciplinary Core Ideas(DCI) in many countries such as America and Europe, the most practical effort has been to design a curriculum with learning progressions(LPs). LPs de...

    There have been much efforts to reconstruct the science curriculum focusing on Disciplinary Core Ideas(DCI) in many countries such as America and Europe, the most practical effort has been to design a curriculum with learning progressions(LPs). LPs describe stepwise how students can systematically move toward the understanding of more sophisticated ideas or scientific activities and explain in succession the process of understanding the ideas while the students learn. In this study, a LP for ecosystems has been developed, and the developed LP is then evaluated accordingly. The Ecosystem is one of the DCI of the life science in Next Generation Science Standards(NGSS). The development process of the LP was set at step 4(Development, Assessment, Analysis, and Amendment), and developed through an iterative process of sequences. As a result of analyzing the developed LP, an assessment based on the LP provides reliable information to identifying student ability. This study proposes the development process of the LP and its methodological aspects to use Core Achievement Standards, Ordered Multiple-Choice items and the Rasch model. In addition, using the empirically proven LP suggests a way of strengthening curriculum linked to educational content, teaching methods and assessment. Utilizing the proposed development process in this study will be to present the standard into the direction of becoming part of the curriculum. Currently, the state of domestic research for the LP is still lacking. This study determined the development process of the LP and the need to conduct future research on the LPs.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 맹승호, "학습 발달과정 연구의 현황, 방법론적 특징 및 연구 사례" 한국과학교육학회 33 (33): 161-180, 2013

    2 이상은, "학교교과 지식의 선정과 조직 과정에 나타난 구조주의적 사유에 대한 비판적 고찰: 2009 개정 과학과 사례를 중심으로" 한국교육과정학회 31 (31): 173-199, 2013

    3 맹승호, "판구조론의 학습발달과정 개발을 위한 지구적 인지과정 평가의 횡단적 문항 반응 분석: Rasch 모델" 한국과학교육학회 35 (35): 37-52, 2015

    4 이윤하, "통합개념을 중심으로 한 싱가포르, 캐나다와 미국의 과학교육과정 내용 요소 분석" 한국과학교육학회 34 (34): 21-32, 2014

    5 성연선, "순위 정렬 선다형 평가 문항을 적용한 초등학교 4~6학년 학생들의 물의 순환에 대한 학습 발달 과정" 한국초등과학교육학회 32 (32): 139-158, 2013

    6 맹승호, "순위 선다형 문항을 이용한 천문 시스템 학습 발달과정 개발 및 타당화 연구" 한국과학교육학회 34 (34): 703-718, 2014

    7 권용주, "생태계에 대한 생물교사의 시스템 사고 분석" 한국생물교육학회 39 (39): 529-543, 2011

    8 백남진, "교과 교육과정에서의 교육내용 진술의 구체화" 한국교육과정학회 24 (24): 207-233, 2006

    9 백남진, "교과 교육과정 성취기준 진술의 개선 방향 탐색: 한국과 미국 과학 교육과정 검토를 중심으로" 한국교육과정학회 32 (32): 101-131, 2014

    10 이재봉, "과학과 교육 내용 개선을 위한 교육과정 내용 관련 쟁점 분석" 과학교육연구소 34 (34): 140-154, 2010

    1 맹승호, "학습 발달과정 연구의 현황, 방법론적 특징 및 연구 사례" 한국과학교육학회 33 (33): 161-180, 2013

    2 이상은, "학교교과 지식의 선정과 조직 과정에 나타난 구조주의적 사유에 대한 비판적 고찰: 2009 개정 과학과 사례를 중심으로" 한국교육과정학회 31 (31): 173-199, 2013

    3 맹승호, "판구조론의 학습발달과정 개발을 위한 지구적 인지과정 평가의 횡단적 문항 반응 분석: Rasch 모델" 한국과학교육학회 35 (35): 37-52, 2015

    4 이윤하, "통합개념을 중심으로 한 싱가포르, 캐나다와 미국의 과학교육과정 내용 요소 분석" 한국과학교육학회 34 (34): 21-32, 2014

    5 성연선, "순위 정렬 선다형 평가 문항을 적용한 초등학교 4~6학년 학생들의 물의 순환에 대한 학습 발달 과정" 한국초등과학교육학회 32 (32): 139-158, 2013

    6 맹승호, "순위 선다형 문항을 이용한 천문 시스템 학습 발달과정 개발 및 타당화 연구" 한국과학교육학회 34 (34): 703-718, 2014

    7 권용주, "생태계에 대한 생물교사의 시스템 사고 분석" 한국생물교육학회 39 (39): 529-543, 2011

    8 백남진, "교과 교육과정에서의 교육내용 진술의 구체화" 한국교육과정학회 24 (24): 207-233, 2006

    9 백남진, "교과 교육과정 성취기준 진술의 개선 방향 탐색: 한국과 미국 과학 교육과정 검토를 중심으로" 한국교육과정학회 32 (32): 101-131, 2014

    10 이재봉, "과학과 교육 내용 개선을 위한 교육과정 내용 관련 쟁점 분석" 과학교육연구소 34 (34): 140-154, 2010

    11 이효녕, "고등학생들의 시스템 사고 측정을 위한 측정 도구 개발과 타당화" 한국과학교육학회 33 (33): 995-1006, 2013

    12 Gotwals, A. W., "Validity evidence for learning progression-based assessment items that fuse core disciplinary ideas and science practices" 50 : 597-626, 2013

    13 Neumann, K., "Towards a learning progression of energy" 50 : 162-188, 2013

    14 Mayr, E., "This Is Biology" The Belknap Press 1997

    15 Ben-Zvi Assaraf, O., "The ‘Life at the poles’ study unit : Developing junior high school students’ ability to recognize the relations between earth systems" 40 (40): 525-549, 2010

    16 Boersma, K., "The feasibility of systems thinking in biology education" 45 (45): 190-197, 2011

    17 Philip Johnson, "The emergence of a learning progression in middle school chemistry" Wiley-Blackwell 48 (48): 849-877, 2011

    18 Gilworth, G., "The development of the BD-QoL : a quality of life measure specific to Behc¸et’s disease" 31 : 931-937, 2004

    19 Ministry of Education [MOE]., "The curriculum of 2009 Revision" MOE 2014

    20 Tennant, A., "The Rasch Measurement Model in Rheumatology : What Is It and Why Use It? When Should It Be Applied, and What Should One Look for in a Rasch Paper" 57 (57): 1358-1362, 2007

    21 National Research Council[NRC]., "Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8" The National Academies Press 2007

    22 National Research Council[NRC]., "Systems for state science assessment. Washington" The National Academies Press 2006

    23 Steedle, J. T., "Supporting valid interpretations of learning progression level diagnoses" 46 : 699-715, 2009

    24 Plummer, J. D., "Spatial thinking as the dimension of progress in an astronomy learning progression" 50 (50): 1-45, 2014

    25 National Assessment Governing Board., "Science framework for the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress." NAGB 2008

    26 National Assessment Governing Board., "Science assessment and item specifications for the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress" NAGB 2007

    27 Callingham, R, "Research in Mathematics Education and Rasch Measurement" 18 (18): 1-10, 2006

    28 Wright, B. D., "Reasonable mean-square fit value" 8 (8): 370-, 1994

    29 Rasch, G., "Probabilistic model for some intelligence and attainment tests" University of Chicago Press 1980

    30 Talanquer, V., "On cognitive constraints and learning progressions : The case of ‘structure of matter’" 31 : 2123-2136, 2009

    31 NGSS Lead States, "Next generation science standards for states, by states" The National Academies Press 2013

    32 National Research Council[NRC]., "Next generation science standards : For states, by states" The National Academy Press 2013

    33 Anderson, C. W., "NAEP pilot learning progression framework" National Assessment Governing Board 2007

    34 Rutstein, D. W., "Measuring learning progressions using Bayesian modeling in complex assessments" University of Maryland 2012

    35 Wilson, M., "Measuring Progressions : Assessment structures underlying a learning progression" 46 (46): 716-730, 2009

    36 Roseman, J. E., "Mapping a coherent learning progression for the molecular basis of heredity" 2006

    37 Maani, K. E., "Links between systems thinking and complex decision making" 20 (20): 21-48, 2004

    38 Furtak, E. M., "Linking a learning progression for natural selection to teachers’ enactment of formative assessment" 49 (49): 1181-1210, 2012

    39 Briggs, D. C., "Learning progressions in science: Current challenges and future directions" Sense Publishers 293-316, 2012

    40 Corcoran, T., "Learning progressions in science: An evidence based approach to reform" Consortium for Policy Research in Education 2009

    41 Westra, R. H. V., "Learning and Teaching Ecosystem Behavior in Secondary Education" University of van Utrecht 2008

    42 신남수, "Learning Progression을 적용한 중·고등학생의 ‘물질의 입자성’에 관한 지식과 미시적 표상에 대한 특성 분석" 한국과학교육학회 34 (34): 437-447, 2014

    43 National Research Council[NRC]., "Knowing what students know : The science and design of educational assessment" The National Academies Press 2001

    44 Smith, C. L., "Implication of research on children’s learning for standards and assessment: A proposed learning progression for matter and the atomic molecular theory" 14 : 1-98, 2011

    45 Songer, N. B., "How and when does complex reasoning occur? Empirically driven development of a learning progressions focused on complex reasoning about biodiversity" 46 (46): 610-631, 2009

    46 Odum, E. P., "Great ideas in ecology for the 1990s" 42 (42): 542-545, 1992

    47 Bertalanffy, L., "General system theory" 35 (35): 22-28, 1968

    48 Briggs, D. C., "Diagnostic assessment with ordered multiple-choice items" 11 (11): 33-63, 2006

    49 Ben-Zvi Assaraf, O., "Development of system thinking skills in the context of earth system education" 42 (42): 518-560, 2005

    50 Alonzo, A. C., "Developing and assessing a force and motion learning progression" 93 (93): 389-421, 2008

    51 Mohan, L., "Developing a multi-year learning progression for carbon cycling in socio-ecological systems" 46 (46): 675-698, 2009

    52 Schwarz, C. V., "Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling : Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners" 46 : 632-654, 2009

    53 Stevens, S. Y., "Developing a Hypothetical Multi-Dimensional Learning Progression for the Nature of Matter" 47 (47): 687-715, 2010

    54 Jin, H., "Developing a Fine-Grained Learning Progression Framework for Carbon Transforming Processes" 35 (35): 1663-1697, 2013

    55 Draney, K., "Designing learning progressions with the BEAR assessment system" 2009

    56 Ministry of Education and Science Technology[MEST]., "Curriculum and operational practices from around the world(Ⅳ)Canada" Busan Metropolitan City Office of Education 2009

    57 Wilson, M., "Constructing measures : An item response modeling approach" Erlbaum 2005

    58 Plummer, J. D., "Building a learning progression for celestial motion : Elementary levels from an earth-based perspective" 47 (47): 768-787, 2010

    59 방담이, "Big idea를 중심으로 한 통합형 과학 교육과정 틀 설계" 한국과학교육학회 33 (33): 1041-1054, 2013

    60 Lee, H., "Assessing Learning Progression of Energy Concepts Across Middle School Grades : The Knowledge Integration Perspective" 94 (94): 665-688, 2009

    61 Rittle-Johnson, B., "Assessing Knowledge of Mathematical Equivalence : A Construct-Modeling Approach" 103 : 85-104, 2011

    62 Gunckel, K. L., "A learning progression for water in socio-ecological systems" 49 (49): 843-868, 2012

    63 Berland L. K., "A learning progression for scientific argumentation : Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts" 94 (94): 765-793, 2010

    64 Jin, H., "A learning progression for energy in socio-ecological systems" 49 : 1149-1180, 2012

    65 Duncan, R. G., "A learning progression for deepening students’understandings of modern genetics across the 5th-10th grades" 46 (46): 655-674, 2009

    66 National Research Council[NRC]., "A Framework for K-12 science education : Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas" The National Academies Press 2012

    67 Ministry of Education and Science Technology[MEST]., "2009 revised national science curriculum" MEST 2011

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-03-29 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of the Korean Association for in Science Education -> Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-04-26 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education -> Journal of the Korean Association for in Science Education KCI등재
    2007-04-03 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Association For Research In Science Education -> The Korean Association for Science Education KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.87 1.87 1.69
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.66 1.54 2.133 0.47
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼