즉결심판과 통고처분에 있어서의 일사부재리의 효력 = Effect of confirmed judgement in connection with summary trial and fine notice disposition

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

If all the crimes arising in society are punished through formal process of public trial then it may function as a disadvantage to defendants who committed minor offences thus desire quick trial. Going through useless complex process is contrary to principle for economy in lawsuit. Accordingly countries of the world stipulated system for trial process by simple method for minor crime case. In our country also as simple public trial process for minor cases there are summary trial and fine notice disposition. Summary trial is a system under which minor crime is not disposed by public trial process according to general criminal proceedings law but by simple and speedy trial process. Such summary trial is defined as possessing identical effect of confirmed judgement and even in precedents of Supreme Court broad effect of confirmed judgements is recognized. Also according to fine notice disposition under the law for punishment of minor offence and road traffic law if chief of police station etc. notifies money penalty as stipulated in the law against certain action of law violation to the violater and if such violator pays such money penalty then process of punishment is closed. Only when violator fails to perform it then such violator is subjected to trial under summary trial process thus it is preceding stage of summary trial. For payment of money penalty under such fine notice disposition effect of confirmed judgement is recognized. Summary trial has special feature which is different from ordinary trial process in terms of trial process and principle on evidence. Also fine notice disposition system ends criminal law process through payment of money penalty by violator thus it excludes court`s intervention on process and contents. Regarding summary trial or fine notice disposition effect of confirmed judgement is provided from the standpoint of closing the relevent process. Even though Supreme Court recognized extensive effect of confirmed judgement on summary trial and law on punishment of minor offence regarding payment of money penalty but with respect to payment of money penalty according to road traffic law the Supreme Court granted only limited recognition thus general criminal case is excluded from it. Such attitude of Supreme Court is considered as completely ignoring form of current law and regulation under which fine notice disposition regulation according to law on punishment of minor offence and road traffic law are completely identical in terms of form of legislation, amount of money penalty, process and effect of payment and method of protest etc. It is also contrary to current judgement of Supreme Court. Under which it was stated that regarding recognizing effect of confirmed judgement on payment of money penalty according to summary trial and law on punishment of minor offences it is necessary to consider normative elements in passing judgement on identity of prosecution fact. Therefore effect of confirmed judgement under the summary trial and law for punishment of minor offences should be applied identically. Thus in view of special nature of the system and tenor of the law correct interpretation would be that effect of confirmed judgement reaches only to relevant action in case of summary trial or payment of money penalty. But even when it has close relationship with above for criminal case under criminal law which is conspicuously different in terms of nature of crime and legally prescribed punishment no effect of confirmed judgement should be recognized. Accordingly it is required to change current judgement of Supreme Court on fine notice disposition under summary trial and law on summary trial which lack not only consistency but also contrary to trial result on identity of prosection toward the direction of uniform interpretation.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 손도일, "확정된 즉결심판의 기판력에 관한 대법원 판결의 검토" 광주지법 1996

2 손동권, "형사소송법" 세창출판사 2010

3 정웅석, "형사소송법" 대명출판사 2008

4 박상열, "형사소송법" 형설출판사 2009

5 임동규, "형사소송법" 법문사 2009

6 노명선, "형사소송법" 성균관대학교 출판부 2009

7 배종대, "형사소송법" 홍문사 2006

8 장교식, "현행 범칙금제도의 개선방안에 관한 검토" 법조협회 51 (51): 2002

9 남선모, "현행 도로교통법의 실무적용상 문제점에 관한 고찰" 한국법학회 (28) : 313-336, 2007

10 송쌍종, "통고처분의 법리와 현행제도의 문제점" 한국세무사회 (42) : 1986

11 박동규, "통고처분에 따른 범칙금납부의 효력" 49 (49): 2004

12 정형근, "질서위반행위규제법에 대한 고찰" 법학연구소 33 (33): 563-599, 2009

13 조병선, "질서위반법" 한국형사정책연구원 1991

14 김형훈, "즉결심판제도의 바람직한 운용 방향" 치안연구소 (15) : 2001

15 박상진, "즉결심판제도의 문제점과 입법론적 고찰" 중앙법학회 4 (4): 1-16, 2002

16 전병용, "즉결심판제도의 개선방안에 관한 연구" 한양대학교 행정대학원 2005

17 한영수, "즉결심판제도에 대한 비판적 고찰" 한국형사정책연구원 (33) : 1998

18 최응렬, "즉결심판제도에 관한 고찰" 한국공안행정학회 (9) : 2000

19 하태훈, "즉결심판절차와 피고인의 인권" 한국법학원 (85) : 2000

20 이정권, "즉결심판에 관한 절차법상 제 문제" 서울남부지방법원 2002

21 홍지영, "즉결심판 절차법상의 제 문제" 서울남부지방법원 2002

22 신동운, "조세범칙사건의 처리절차" 서울대학교 법학연구소 39 (39): 1998

23 신동희, "조세범처벌절차법상의 통고처분에 대한 검토" 한국국제조세협회 17 : 2001

24 법무부, "일본형사소송법·규칙" 법무부 2009

25 이돈일, "일본의 즉결심판제도" 치안연구소 (11) : 1998

26 신동운, "신형사소송법" 법문사 2008

27 이재상, "신형사소송법" 박영사 2007

28 오기두, "미국의 경죄처리절차 및 그 운영" 법조협회 54 (54): 53-88, 2005

29 신동운, "로스쿨 형사소송법" 법문사 2009

30 정광정, "도로교통법상 통고처분제도 개선에 관한 연구" 한국법학회 (18) : 173-193, 2005

31 류석준, "교통신호위반죄와 신호위반으로 인한 업무상과실치상죄의 범죄사실의 동일성 여부" 한국형사법학회 20 (20): 283-301, 2008

32 김남철, "교통법규위반행위의 유형 및 제재수단의 법적 문제- 한국과 독일의 도로교통법령의 비교를 중심으로 -" 한국토지공법학회 35 : 409-435, 2007

33 김원중, "교통범칙금의 문제점과 개선방안 연구" 한국법학회 (14) : 149-166, 2004

34 김형준, "공소장변경의 필요성과 한계" 중앙법학회 2 : 2000

35 임 상 규, "공소사실의 동일성에 관한 대법원의 규범논리" 한국법학원 (98) : 169-184, 2007

36 백형구, "공소사실의 동일성과 기판력"

37 손동권, "경죄처벌절차의 최근 입법동향에 관한 고찰" 한국공안행정학회 (22) : 15-40, 2006

38 박주혁, "경죄사건의 신속처리방안에 관한 연구" 고려대학교 법무대학원 2005

39 한국형사정책연구원, "경범죄처벌법에 관한 연구" 한국형사정책연구원 1996

40 이상윤, "경미범죄처리절차에 대한 연구" 성균관대학교 대학원 2007

41 김상헌, "강도상해죄와 장물취득죄 사이에 공소사실의 동일성이 있는지 여부" 박영사 (3) : 1996

42 福井厚, "起訴狀一本主と義訴因の特定·明示" 44 (44): 1999

43 田宮裕, "註釋刑事訴訟法" 株式會社有斐閣 2001

44 성윤환, "現行 卽決審判制度의 問題點과 改善方案" 중앙법학회 8 (8): 113-156, 2006

45 松本時夫, "條解刑事訴訟法" 弘文堂 2009

46 平野龍一, "新實例刑事訴訟法Ⅱ" 靑林書院 2000

47 藤永幸治, "大コンメンタール 刑事訴訟法" 靑林書院 1995

48 福井厚, "刑事訴訟法講義" 法律文化社 2009

49 三井誠, "刑事訴訟法Ⅱ" 有斐閣 2005

50 田宮裕, "刑事訴訟法 新版" 有斐閣 2005

51 高田卓爾, "刑事訴訟法" 靑林書院 1990

52 白取祐司, "刑事訴訟法" (3) : 2005

53 田宮裕, "刑事訴訟法" 有限會社北樹出版 1984

54 下牧武, "交通事件卽決裁判手續法" 法曹 6 (6): 1954