RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    한국과 미국의 국회의원 표결요인 비교 = 자유무역협정 비준의 경우

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76176306

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this paper is to analyze and compare roll-call voting in Korean Assembly and the U.S Congress. Free trade agreement was considered to give benefits to the capitalist groups, while it engendered intense feelings on the part of people who had less competition in the international market. I test and compare the models of roll-call voting on the free trade agreements of the two countries by exploring the degree to which constituency, institutional and dispositional forces worked at cross-purposes in shaping congressmen’s roll-call behavior on this legislation. On the one hand partisanship, ideological dispositions of House members, and the demands of large constituency groups are the powerful predictors of roll-call support for NAFTA in the U.S. congress. On the other hand, ideology is not statistically significant and partisanship as well as dispositions of districts are the most influential factors in voting behavior in Korea. In both countries, representatives weighed the opinions of significant populations within their districts.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this paper is to analyze and compare roll-call voting in Korean Assembly and the U.S Congress. Free trade agreement was considered to give benefits to the capitalist groups, while it engendered intense feelings on the part of people who...

    The purpose of this paper is to analyze and compare roll-call voting in Korean Assembly and the U.S Congress. Free trade agreement was considered to give benefits to the capitalist groups, while it engendered intense feelings on the part of people who had less competition in the international market. I test and compare the models of roll-call voting on the free trade agreements of the two countries by exploring the degree to which constituency, institutional and dispositional forces worked at cross-purposes in shaping congressmen’s roll-call behavior on this legislation. On the one hand partisanship, ideological dispositions of House members, and the demands of large constituency groups are the powerful predictors of roll-call support for NAFTA in the U.S. congress. On the other hand, ideology is not statistically significant and partisanship as well as dispositions of districts are the most influential factors in voting behavior in Korea. In both countries, representatives weighed the opinions of significant populations within their districts.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 전용주, "후보공천과정의 민주화와 그 정치적 결과에 관한 연구" 39 (39): 2005

    2 정진민, "후기산업사회 정당정치와 한국의 정당발전" 한울아카데미 1998

    3 임혁백, "밀레니엄 시대의 민주주의 대안: 심의 민주주의" 43 (43): 1999

    4 최준영, "미 하원의원들의 투표행태에 관한 연구: 정치적 개인성(Political Individuality)을 중심으로" 한국정치학회 38 (38): 2004

    5 이현우, "국회의원의 표결 요인분석: 정당, 이념 그리고 지역구" 2004

    6 윤종빈, "국회의원의 역할유형에 관한 비교연구 ; 지역구활동을 중심으로" 한국정치학회 34 (34): 2000

    7 윤종빈, "국회의원과 선거구민의 관계연구: 현직의원에 대한 평가를 중심으로" 한국정치학회 36 (36): 2002

    8 Orstein, Morman J, "Vital Statistics on Congress, 2001-2002" AEI 2002

    9 Cox, "University of California Press" 1993.

    10 Washington Post, "Transcript of the Third Presidential Debate" 1992.2.10a-22

    1 전용주, "후보공천과정의 민주화와 그 정치적 결과에 관한 연구" 39 (39): 2005

    2 정진민, "후기산업사회 정당정치와 한국의 정당발전" 한울아카데미 1998

    3 임혁백, "밀레니엄 시대의 민주주의 대안: 심의 민주주의" 43 (43): 1999

    4 최준영, "미 하원의원들의 투표행태에 관한 연구: 정치적 개인성(Political Individuality)을 중심으로" 한국정치학회 38 (38): 2004

    5 이현우, "국회의원의 표결 요인분석: 정당, 이념 그리고 지역구" 2004

    6 윤종빈, "국회의원의 역할유형에 관한 비교연구 ; 지역구활동을 중심으로" 한국정치학회 34 (34): 2000

    7 윤종빈, "국회의원과 선거구민의 관계연구: 현직의원에 대한 평가를 중심으로" 한국정치학회 36 (36): 2002

    8 Orstein, Morman J, "Vital Statistics on Congress, 2001-2002" AEI 2002

    9 Cox, "University of California Press" 1993.

    10 Washington Post, "Transcript of the Third Presidential Debate" 1992.2.10a-22

    11 Reichardt, "The Statistical Analysis of Data from Nonequivalent Group Design" Houghton Mifflin Company 1979.

    12 Poole,Keith T, "The Polarization of American Politics" 46 : 1984

    13 Pitkin,Hanna Fenichel, "The Concept of Representation." Berkeley 1967.

    14 Kalt, "The Apparent Ideological Behavior of Legislators Testing for Principal-agent Slack in Political Institutions. Journal of Law and Economics" 1990

    15 Fiorina,Morris P, "Retrospective Voting in American National Elections." Yale University Press 1981.

    16 Judge, David, "Representation: Theory and Practice in Britain" Routledge 1999

    17 Schneider, Friedrich, "Public Attitudes Toward Economic Conditions and Their Impact on Government Behavior" Agathon Press

    18 Neustadt,Richard E, "Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents." The Free Press 1990.

    19 Edwards III, "Presidential Approval:A Sourcebook." Johns Hopkins University Press 1990.

    20 Pearson, Kathryn, "Party Discipline in the Contemporary Congress: Rewarding Loyalty with Legislative Preference" 2003

    21 Rohde,David W, "Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House." University of Chicago Press 1991.

    22 Kingdon,John W, "Models of Legislative Voting" 39 : 1977

    23 Jenkins, Jeffery, "Ideology, Economic Interests, and Congressional Roll-call Voting: Partisan Instability and Bank of the United States Legislation" 100 : 1999

    24 Fenno, "Home Style:House Members in Their Districts." HarperCollins 1978.

    25 Weisberg,Herbert E, "Evaluating Theories of Congressional Roll-Call Voting" 22 : 1978

    26 Synder, James M, "Estimating Party Influence in Congressional Roll-Call Voting" 44 : 2000

    27 Krehbiel,Keith, "Constituency Characteristics and Legislative Preferences" 76 : 1993

    28 Kingdon,John W, "Congressmen’s Voting Decisions." Harper & Row 1989.

    29 Meyhew, "Congress:The Electoral Connection." Yale University Press 1974.

    30 Fiorina, "Congress:Keystone of the Washington Establishment." Lexington Books 1989.

    31 Poole, Keith T, "Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting" Oxford University Press 1997

    32 Brown, Sherrod, "Congress from the Inside:Observations from the Majority and the Minority" Kent State University Press 2000

    33 Van Doren,Peter, "Can We Learn the Causes of Congressional Decisions from Roll Call Data?" 15 : 1990

    34 Peltzman, Sam, "An Economic Interpretation of the History of Congressional Voting in the Twentieth Century" 75 : 656-75, 1985

    35 Wittman, "A Synthesis of Alternatives" 1983

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2018-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2013-03-22 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Korean Journal of International Studies -> Korean Journal of International Relations KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2010-12-01 등재 학술지 분리 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2010-06-22 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Korean Journal of International Relations -> The Korean Journal of International Studies KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.91 0.91 1.12
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.07 1.09 1.415 0.17
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼