RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    수돗물불소화사업에 관한 헌법적 고찰 = A Study on Constitutional Problems of the Public Water Fluoridation Policy

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76394508

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The Public Water Fluoridation Policy is a national project to prevent teeth from decaying and treat a decayed toot by putting fluoride chemicals into piped water. Government emphasize that this policy is the best public health policy which enable all citizens to receive benefits effectively, equally, and economically. But a lot of people are against this policy of the present government, because it was not verified that this policy was not injurious to health.
    From my point of view, this policy have a lot of problems, in terms of fundamental human rights and legislation. : This Policy was administered without having a living-body test or a scientifical verification Whether it was injurious to human body and natural environment or not. On the contrary, legislative power produced a result of ending the scientifical and medical dispure by majoriry rule. In the present situation, perhaps this legislation for supporting 'Public Water Fluoridation' may invite irreparable damages to our healrh. That is, this policy may violate the rights of health. Clearly, it divests us of rhe rights of choosing and drinking pure warer, the liberty of selecting contract contents, and authority to decide our fate. Lastly, it has several problems in respect of Constitutionalism or the rule of law, and does not have systematic suitability between related laws.
    In conclusion, in my judgment, this policy is unconstitutional legislation.
    Therefore, the Ministry of Health and Welfate must prepare the public health policy of dental hygiene and care, without prejudice to such self-control of society and fundamental human rights as all citizens including the weak and minority may enjoy.
    번역하기

    The Public Water Fluoridation Policy is a national project to prevent teeth from decaying and treat a decayed toot by putting fluoride chemicals into piped water. Government emphasize that this policy is the best public health policy which enable all ...

    The Public Water Fluoridation Policy is a national project to prevent teeth from decaying and treat a decayed toot by putting fluoride chemicals into piped water. Government emphasize that this policy is the best public health policy which enable all citizens to receive benefits effectively, equally, and economically. But a lot of people are against this policy of the present government, because it was not verified that this policy was not injurious to health.
    From my point of view, this policy have a lot of problems, in terms of fundamental human rights and legislation. : This Policy was administered without having a living-body test or a scientifical verification Whether it was injurious to human body and natural environment or not. On the contrary, legislative power produced a result of ending the scientifical and medical dispure by majoriry rule. In the present situation, perhaps this legislation for supporting 'Public Water Fluoridation' may invite irreparable damages to our healrh. That is, this policy may violate the rights of health. Clearly, it divests us of rhe rights of choosing and drinking pure warer, the liberty of selecting contract contents, and authority to decide our fate. Lastly, it has several problems in respect of Constitutionalism or the rule of law, and does not have systematic suitability between related laws.
    In conclusion, in my judgment, this policy is unconstitutional legislation.
    Therefore, the Ministry of Health and Welfate must prepare the public health policy of dental hygiene and care, without prejudice to such self-control of society and fundamental human rights as all citizens including the weak and minority may enjoy.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
    • Ⅱ. 수돗물불소화사업에 대한 개관
    • Ⅲ. 수돗물불소화사업과 기본권
    • Ⅳ. 수돗물불소화사업의 입법론적 문제점
    • Ⅴ. 맺음말
    • Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
    • Ⅱ. 수돗물불소화사업에 대한 개관
    • Ⅲ. 수돗물불소화사업과 기본권
    • Ⅳ. 수돗물불소화사업의 입법론적 문제점
    • Ⅴ. 맺음말
    • [참고문헌]
    • [Abstract]
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.02 1.02 0.87
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.89 0.87 0.967 0.5
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼