RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      동성혼 합법화에 대한 법정신분석학적 고찰: 심리적 양성성 인정과 정상가족 이데올로기의해체를 중심으로 = Psychoanalytic Understanding of the Legalization of Same-sex Marriage: Focusing on the recognition of psychological bisexuality and the deconstruction of normal family ideology

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99933346

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The issue of the legalization of same-sex marriage demands complex discussion which invites not only legal arguments but also psychoanalytical insights. It is because this issue involves deep psychological problems such as sexuality or fear towards one`s own unconscious instincts. This article asks the question whether the dichotomy between heterosexual love and homosexual love can be maintained from a psychoanalytical perspective which admits human psychological bisexuality. The author locates this question at the center of the issue of legalizing same-sex marriage. After exploring this dichotomy from a psychoanalytical perspective, this article concludes that the dichotomy between heterosexual love and homosexual love cannot be held, and therefore, neither can the dichotomy between same-sex marriage and heterosexual marriage be maintained. The legal dichotomy between same-sex marriage and heterosexual marriage is shown to have been maintained by the State in order to control the human resources that are produced through procreation within a heterosexual marriage. The article then proceeds to argue that the legalization of same-sex marriage is a problem that affects not only those who are marginalized due to sexual orientation but also everyone who is suffering under the ideological conception of gender role. It is because the author believes that the legalization of same-sex marriage, based on the recognition of psychological bisexuality, will have the effect of weakening the ideological conception of gender role, which has ruled as the superego for everyone in a civilized society. Furthermore, the article relates to the deconstruction of the ideology of a normal family. The normal family ideology, which forms the triangle of ‘marriage-procreation-family’, has the problem of exclusive inclusion. While certain selected forms of relationship, which match the normal family ideology, are protected under the law, other forms of intimate relationships are discriminated against and excluded. This article claims that the legalization of same-sex marriage should go together with the deconstruction of the normal family ideology in order to overcome the risk of exclusive inclusion. The normal family ideology has other problems as well, such as the discrimination of children born outside of marriage, leading to the heightening of the abortion rate. Such arguments are also dealt with in the article in relation to the legalization of same-sex marriage. The author concludes with a vision of a more humane society where individuals have the freedom to fully embrace one`s bisexuality, which would lead to the humanization of the institution of marriage by promoting gender equality, and also where more diversified forms of intimate relationship would enjoy legal protection through the deconstruction of the normal family ideology.
      번역하기

      The issue of the legalization of same-sex marriage demands complex discussion which invites not only legal arguments but also psychoanalytical insights. It is because this issue involves deep psychological problems such as sexuality or fear towards on...

      The issue of the legalization of same-sex marriage demands complex discussion which invites not only legal arguments but also psychoanalytical insights. It is because this issue involves deep psychological problems such as sexuality or fear towards one`s own unconscious instincts. This article asks the question whether the dichotomy between heterosexual love and homosexual love can be maintained from a psychoanalytical perspective which admits human psychological bisexuality. The author locates this question at the center of the issue of legalizing same-sex marriage. After exploring this dichotomy from a psychoanalytical perspective, this article concludes that the dichotomy between heterosexual love and homosexual love cannot be held, and therefore, neither can the dichotomy between same-sex marriage and heterosexual marriage be maintained. The legal dichotomy between same-sex marriage and heterosexual marriage is shown to have been maintained by the State in order to control the human resources that are produced through procreation within a heterosexual marriage. The article then proceeds to argue that the legalization of same-sex marriage is a problem that affects not only those who are marginalized due to sexual orientation but also everyone who is suffering under the ideological conception of gender role. It is because the author believes that the legalization of same-sex marriage, based on the recognition of psychological bisexuality, will have the effect of weakening the ideological conception of gender role, which has ruled as the superego for everyone in a civilized society. Furthermore, the article relates to the deconstruction of the ideology of a normal family. The normal family ideology, which forms the triangle of ‘marriage-procreation-family’, has the problem of exclusive inclusion. While certain selected forms of relationship, which match the normal family ideology, are protected under the law, other forms of intimate relationships are discriminated against and excluded. This article claims that the legalization of same-sex marriage should go together with the deconstruction of the normal family ideology in order to overcome the risk of exclusive inclusion. The normal family ideology has other problems as well, such as the discrimination of children born outside of marriage, leading to the heightening of the abortion rate. Such arguments are also dealt with in the article in relation to the legalization of same-sex marriage. The author concludes with a vision of a more humane society where individuals have the freedom to fully embrace one`s bisexuality, which would lead to the humanization of the institution of marriage by promoting gender equality, and also where more diversified forms of intimate relationship would enjoy legal protection through the deconstruction of the normal family ideology.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼