RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      해외직접투자이론의 여러 접근방법에 대한 체계적 고찰 = Systematic Classification of Approaches of FDI Theories

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103847590

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Various foreign direct investment theories have been developed by many kinds of approaches by many scholars since S. Hymer's seminal dissertation in 1960. The reasons why FDI theories have been developed in such a way are that; 1) foreign direct investments are implemented by various motivation such as resource-seeking, market-seeking, efficiency-seeking, technology-seeking, diversification-seeking 2) FDI theories have been developed based on various disciplines of economics such as theories of international capital movement, trade, location, industrial organization, innovation, and the theory of firm 3) FDI can be analyzed in four dimensions such as political economy, macro economy, industry, micro economy.
      Therefore, Disparate approaches coexisted in the scope of FDI theories, and John Dunning proposed the conceptual framework of OLI paradigm in a eclectic style. However, Dunning's paradigm covered the theories of liberal perspectives, and could not contain the structuralist theories and were deficient in the dynamic approach.
      Hence, this essay develops a systematic classification of approaches of FDI theories by reviewing the historical evolution of FDI theories including S. Hymer's approach, internalization approach, the general theory approach, the approach of industry dimension, macroeconomic approach, structuralist approach, dynamic approach and summarize FDI theories according to this systematic classification.
      Various approaches of FDI theories are classified as liberal v.s. structuralist in the ideological perspectives, and are classified as four analysis unit dimensions of political economy, macro economy, industry, micro economy, and are classified as static v.s. dynamic in the decision making dimension. This systematic classification of approaches of FDI theories is depicted as <Figure 1> and according to this systematic structure of approaches, FDI theories are summarized as <Table 2>.
      번역하기

      Various foreign direct investment theories have been developed by many kinds of approaches by many scholars since S. Hymer's seminal dissertation in 1960. The reasons why FDI theories have been developed in such a way are that; 1) foreign direct inves...

      Various foreign direct investment theories have been developed by many kinds of approaches by many scholars since S. Hymer's seminal dissertation in 1960. The reasons why FDI theories have been developed in such a way are that; 1) foreign direct investments are implemented by various motivation such as resource-seeking, market-seeking, efficiency-seeking, technology-seeking, diversification-seeking 2) FDI theories have been developed based on various disciplines of economics such as theories of international capital movement, trade, location, industrial organization, innovation, and the theory of firm 3) FDI can be analyzed in four dimensions such as political economy, macro economy, industry, micro economy.
      Therefore, Disparate approaches coexisted in the scope of FDI theories, and John Dunning proposed the conceptual framework of OLI paradigm in a eclectic style. However, Dunning's paradigm covered the theories of liberal perspectives, and could not contain the structuralist theories and were deficient in the dynamic approach.
      Hence, this essay develops a systematic classification of approaches of FDI theories by reviewing the historical evolution of FDI theories including S. Hymer's approach, internalization approach, the general theory approach, the approach of industry dimension, macroeconomic approach, structuralist approach, dynamic approach and summarize FDI theories according to this systematic classification.
      Various approaches of FDI theories are classified as liberal v.s. structuralist in the ideological perspectives, and are classified as four analysis unit dimensions of political economy, macro economy, industry, micro economy, and are classified as static v.s. dynamic in the decision making dimension. This systematic classification of approaches of FDI theories is depicted as <Figure 1> and according to this systematic structure of approaches, FDI theories are summarized as <Table 2>.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김선식, "한국기업의 기업특유경쟁우위 형성에 관한 실증적 연구" 8 : 127-149, 1997

      2 Cowling, K., "Transnational Monopoly Capitalism" Harvester Wheatsheaf 1987

      3 Kojima, K., "Transfer of Technology to Developing Countries: Japanese Type versus American Type" 17 : 1-14, 1977

      4 Graham, E.M., "Transatlantic Investment by Multinational Firms: A Rivaristic Phenomenon?" 1 (1): 82-99, 1978

      5 Casson, M.C., "Transaction Costs and the Theory of the Multinational enterprise. in: New Theories of the Multinational Enterprise" Croom Helm 1982

      6 Hennart, Jean-Francois, "Transaction Costs Theory and the Multinational Enterprise. in: The Nature of the Transnational Firm.(2nd ed)" Routledge 2000

      7 Kojima, K., "Toward a Theory of Industrial Restructuring and Dynamic Comparative Advantage" 26 (26): 135-145, 1985

      8 McManus, J., "The Theory of the International Firm. in: The Multinational Firm and the Nation State" Collier-Macmillan 66-93, 1972

      9 Penrose, E., "The Theory of the Growth of the Firm" Basil Blackwell 1959

      10 Kay, N., "The Resource-based Approach to Multinational Enterprise. in: The Nature of the Transnational Firm((2nd ed)" Routledge 2000

      1 김선식, "한국기업의 기업특유경쟁우위 형성에 관한 실증적 연구" 8 : 127-149, 1997

      2 Cowling, K., "Transnational Monopoly Capitalism" Harvester Wheatsheaf 1987

      3 Kojima, K., "Transfer of Technology to Developing Countries: Japanese Type versus American Type" 17 : 1-14, 1977

      4 Graham, E.M., "Transatlantic Investment by Multinational Firms: A Rivaristic Phenomenon?" 1 (1): 82-99, 1978

      5 Casson, M.C., "Transaction Costs and the Theory of the Multinational enterprise. in: New Theories of the Multinational Enterprise" Croom Helm 1982

      6 Hennart, Jean-Francois, "Transaction Costs Theory and the Multinational Enterprise. in: The Nature of the Transnational Firm.(2nd ed)" Routledge 2000

      7 Kojima, K., "Toward a Theory of Industrial Restructuring and Dynamic Comparative Advantage" 26 (26): 135-145, 1985

      8 McManus, J., "The Theory of the International Firm. in: The Multinational Firm and the Nation State" Collier-Macmillan 66-93, 1972

      9 Penrose, E., "The Theory of the Growth of the Firm" Basil Blackwell 1959

      10 Kay, N., "The Resource-based Approach to Multinational Enterprise. in: The Nature of the Transnational Firm((2nd ed)" Routledge 2000

      11 Lall, S., "The New Multinationals: The Spread of Third World Enterprises" John Wiley & Sons 1983

      12 Coase R.H., "The Nature of the Firm" 4 : 386-405, 1937

      13 Johanson, J., "The Mechanism of Internationalization" 7 (7): 5-10, 1990

      14 Vernon R., "The Location of Economic Activity. in: Economic Analysis and the Multinational Enterprise" Allen & Unwin 1974

      15 Johanson, J., "The Internationalization of the Firm: four Swedish Cases" 12 (12): 305-322, 1975

      16 Johanson, J., "The Internationalization Process of the Firm: A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitment" 8 : 23-32, 1977

      17 Hymer, S., "The International Operations of National Firms; A Study of Direct Investment" MIT Press 1976

      18 Cantwell J., "The Globalization of Technology: What Remains of the Product Cycle Model" 19 (19): 155-174, 1995

      19 Aharoni, Y., "The Foreign Investment Decision Process" Harvard University Press 1966

      20 Dunning J.H., "The Eclectic Theory of the Multinational Enterprise and the International Hotel Industry. in: New Theories of the Multinational Enterprise" Croom Helm 1982

      21 Dunning, J.H., "The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: An Update and a Reply to Its Critics" 19 (19): 1988

      22 Teece, D., "Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Costs of Transferring Technological Know-how" 87 : 242-261, 1977

      23 Cantwell J., "Technological Innovation and Multinational Corporations" Blaxkwell 1989

      24 Mathew, J.A., "Response to Professors Dunning and Narula" 23 : 153-155, 2006

      25 Knickerbocker, F.T., "Oligopolistic Reaction and the Multinational Enterprise" Harvard University Press 1973

      26 Graham, E.M., "Oligopolistic Imitation and European Direct Investment" Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration 1975

      27 Rugman, A.M., "New Theories of the Multinational Enterprise" Croom Helm 1982

      28 Buckley, P.J., "New Theories of International Business: Some Unresolved Issues. in: The Growth of International Business" Allen & Unwin 1983

      29 Caves, R. E., "Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis" Cambridge University Press 1982

      30 Williamson, O.E., "Markets and Hierarchies: Some Elementary Considerations" 63 (63): 316-325, 1973

      31 Graham, E.M., "Market Structure and the Multinational Enterprise: a Game-theoric Approach" 29 (29): 67-83, 1998

      32 Gray, H.P., "Macroeconomic Theories of Foreign Direct Investment: An Assessment. in: New Theories of the Multinational Enterprise" Croom Helm 1982

      33 Kogut B., "Knowledge of the Firm and the Evolutionary Theory of the Multinational Corporation" 24 (24): 625-645, 1993

      34 Graham, E.M., "Intra-industry Direct Investment, Market Structure, Firm Rivalry and Technological Performance. in: Multinationals as Mutual Invaders: Intra-industry Direct Foreign Investment" Croom Helm 1985

      35 Vernon, R., "International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle" 80 : 190-207, 1966

      36 Rugman, A.M., "Inside the Multinationals: The Economics of Internal Markets" Columbia University Press 1981

      37 Nelson, R.R., "In Search of a Useful Theory of Innovations" 6 : 36-76, 1977

      38 Wells, L.T. Jr., "Foreign Investors from the Third World. in: Multinationals from Developing Countries" Lexington Books 1981

      39 Dunning, J.H., "Explaining the International Direct Investment Position of Countries: Towards a Dynamic or Developmental Approach" 117 (117): 30-64, 1981

      40 Dunning, J.H., "Explaining Changing Patterns of International Production: In Defense of the Eclectic Theory" 41 (41): 269-295, 1980

      41 Sanna-Randaccio, F., "European Direct Investments in US Manufacturing" University of Oxford 1980

      42 Kalecki, M., "Dynamics of the Capitalist Economy" Cambridge University Press 1971

      43 Peoples, J., "Divide and Rule by Transnational Corporations. in: The Nature of the Transnational Firm(2nd ed)" Routledge 2000

      44 Faeth, I., "Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: A Tale of Nine Theoretical Models" 23 (23): 165-196, 2009

      45 Giddy I.H., "Conventional Theory and Unconventional Multinationals: Do New Forms of Multinational Enterprise Require New Theories?. in: New Theories of the Multinational Enterprise" Croom Helm 1982

      46 Bain, J.S., "Barriers to New Competition, Cambridge" Harvard University Press 1956

      47 Kindleberger, C.P., "American Business Abroad: Six Lectures on Direct Investment" Yale University Press 1969

      48 Hennart, J., "A Theory of Multinational Enterprise" University of Michigan Press 1982

      49 Aliber, R.Z., "A Theory of Direct Foreign Investment. in: The International Corporation" MIT Press 1970

      50 Cantwell J., "A Survey of Theories of International Production. in: The Nature of the Transnational Firm. (2nd ed)" Routledge 2000

      51 Kojima, K., "A Macroeconomic Approach to Foreign Direct Investment" 14 (14): 1-21, 1970

      52 Buckley, P.J., "A Long-run Theory of the Multinational Enterprise. in: The Future of the Multinational Enterprise" Macmillan 32-65, 1976

      53 Yamin, M., "A Critical Re-evaluation of Hymer's Contribution to the Theory of the Transnational Corporation. in: The Nature of the Transnational Firm(2nd ed)" Routledge 2000

      54 Cyert, R.M., "A Behavioral Theory of the Firm" Prentice-Hall 1963

      55 Dunning, J.H., ""Trade, Location of Economic Activity and the MNE: A Search for an Eclectic Approach. in: The International Allocation of Economic Activity" Macmillan 395-431, 1977

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.77 0.77 0.82
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.82 0.8 0.825 0.14
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼