RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      밀의 자유론과 해악의 원리 = J. S. Mill’s Theory of Liberty and the Harm Principle

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82623748

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This essay discusses the essential feature of the idea of liberty espoused by John Stuart Mill and the liberty-limiting principles contained in his philosophical arguments on liberty. As the fundamental liberty-limiting principle, J. S. Mill vindicates the harm principle. Mill’s liberty principle with the harm principle states that the only purpose for which interference with the conduct of individuals is permitted is to prevent harm to others. The extent of Mill’s restriction on the scope of social intervention depends on whether intervention is confined to conduct which causes harm to others, or whether it applies much more broadly to cover cases in which intervention prevents harm to others. In this essay I discuss that Mill seems to move from a formulation of his principle in terms of harm-causing to one in terms of harm-prevention. Mill’s liberty principle as we understand this way is susceptible of being applied to contemporary issues of Korean society.
      As Contemporary Korean society has been rapidly transforming from its traditional community and family-oriented structure into individualistic and nuclear family one, members of society have been and are experiencing tremendous diversity of the ambit of liberty, showing confusion on its true contents and limits With regard to the criminalization of adultery and homosexuality and the legal prohibition of pornography, there has been heated debate whether those regulation is appropriate under the constitutional rubric of liberal democratic society. As Korean society aspiring to be an advanced one, a fundamental task is to establish a genuine framework of liberal society, reconciling a core value of liberty enjoyed by individuals with its supplementing value of the common good. We may find a guideline for this kind of reconciliation between the individual liberty and the value of community from the delicate discussion on the true concept of liberty and its contour by John Stuart Mill.
      번역하기

      This essay discusses the essential feature of the idea of liberty espoused by John Stuart Mill and the liberty-limiting principles contained in his philosophical arguments on liberty. As the fundamental liberty-limiting principle, J. S. Mill vindicate...

      This essay discusses the essential feature of the idea of liberty espoused by John Stuart Mill and the liberty-limiting principles contained in his philosophical arguments on liberty. As the fundamental liberty-limiting principle, J. S. Mill vindicates the harm principle. Mill’s liberty principle with the harm principle states that the only purpose for which interference with the conduct of individuals is permitted is to prevent harm to others. The extent of Mill’s restriction on the scope of social intervention depends on whether intervention is confined to conduct which causes harm to others, or whether it applies much more broadly to cover cases in which intervention prevents harm to others. In this essay I discuss that Mill seems to move from a formulation of his principle in terms of harm-causing to one in terms of harm-prevention. Mill’s liberty principle as we understand this way is susceptible of being applied to contemporary issues of Korean society.
      As Contemporary Korean society has been rapidly transforming from its traditional community and family-oriented structure into individualistic and nuclear family one, members of society have been and are experiencing tremendous diversity of the ambit of liberty, showing confusion on its true contents and limits With regard to the criminalization of adultery and homosexuality and the legal prohibition of pornography, there has been heated debate whether those regulation is appropriate under the constitutional rubric of liberal democratic society. As Korean society aspiring to be an advanced one, a fundamental task is to establish a genuine framework of liberal society, reconciling a core value of liberty enjoyed by individuals with its supplementing value of the common good. We may find a guideline for this kind of reconciliation between the individual liberty and the value of community from the delicate discussion on the true concept of liberty and its contour by John Stuart Mill.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 밀의 자유론
      • Ⅲ. 해악의 원리와 해악방지의 원리
      • Ⅳ. 해악방지의 원리의 적용사례 - 긴급한 위험에 처한 자에 대한 간이구조행위의 법적 강제와 관련하여
      • Ⅴ. 자유론에서 기타 자유제한의 원리
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 밀의 자유론
      • Ⅲ. 해악의 원리와 해악방지의 원리
      • Ⅳ. 해악방지의 원리의 적용사례 - 긴급한 위험에 처한 자에 대한 간이구조행위의 법적 강제와 관련하여
      • Ⅴ. 자유론에서 기타 자유제한의 원리
      • Ⅵ. 결론
      • 인용 문헌
      • Abstract
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼