교섭대표노조의 법적 지위 관점에서 본 공정대표의무의 의의와 내용 = A study on the duty of fair representation in terms of the legal status of bargaining representative union

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

It has been five years since the single bargaining channel system was introduced. The system is currently going to take root. However, there has been a lot of controversy over the single bargaining channel system. A typical example is duty of fair representation.




While the article 29-4 of the Act stipulates that “The bargaining representative union and employer shall not discriminate against trade unions participating in the procedure for determining the bargaining representative union or their members without any reasonable grounds.”, its legal basis and characteristic is not clear.




Even though there are many other issues, this study aims to review the duty of fair representation in terms of the legal status of bargaining representative union. Furthermore, this paper examines classic example - Time-off system, labor union office - on the basis of the reviews.




In conclusion, the bargaining representative union has separate, independent representative status. The duty of fair representation plays roles in providing the basis of for justification of collective agreement, ensuring union democracy. Therefore, bargaining representative union has duty of fair representation which includes both procedural and substantive perspectives.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박종희, "현행 노동관계법상 근로자대표의 중첩성과 이에 관한 기능조정 방안" 한국노동연구원 1998

2 이종복, "사법관계와 자율" 1993

3 이성희, "복수노조 및 전임자 실태와 정책과제" 한국노동연구원 2011

4 박종희, "단체교섭권을 상급단체에 위임한 단위노동조합의 교섭능력" (6) : 1997

5 김형배, "노동법" 2015

6 박종희, "교섭창구 단일화 제도의 시행에 따른 쟁점 및 그에 대한 합리적 해결방안에 관한 연구" 법학연구원 (71) : 231-291, 2013

7 박지순, "공정대표의무의 의의와 내용" 2011

8 이정, "‘자율교섭’과 ‘교섭단위분리’에 관한 법적 쟁점" 한국노동법학회 (41) : 255-285, 2012