RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    복수의 공급업체가 경쟁하는 공급사슬의 최적가격정책

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100856867

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    We analyze an optimal pricing scheme of a product and its inherent dynamics to maximize the profit for the entire supply chain with two competing suppliers and a monopolistic retailer when the demand pattern is uncertain and the back-order is allowed in case. In this environment we assume that the products by the suppliers are substitutable each other with a certain degree even though their retail prices could be different each other in the market depending on the retailor`s decision. It is proved that each player in the supply chain is able to achieve increased profit comparing with the present one by following the suggested pricing scheme with some game theoretical process. In addition we show that the model appears to show equivalent results with the independent demand case if there is no substitutability between two products in our model. Under the circumstance the suggested pricing scheme for the products become mutually exclusive, which is consistent with many well-known results in the past researches. Also we show that the new retail price as well as the whole prices are quite sensitive to various market related parameters such as production costs by the suppliers and the relative size of each product`s retail market. From the standpoint of suppliers, the new pricing scheme suggests that each supplier in the supply chain should determine its wholesale price considering several relevant factors of the scheme to maximize the joint profit with its retailer when the competitor maintains a certain level of its wholesale price. On the other hand, the competitor is supposed to suffer a significant deal of loss in its demand and profit if it sticks to its existing wholesale price when the competing supplier changes its wholesale price following the scheme we suggested. Therefore the process to determine the wholesale prices are supposed to follow an game theoretical procedure considering the competing rival`s pricing policy. If a supplier deviates the scheme and apply some different wholesale price, it has to swallow a bitter pill. The magnitude of such an impact tends to depend on the degree of substitutability between two products as well as some other market related parameters such as the production costs of both sides and the price elasticity of the two products. As a result the scheme evokes a strong incentive for the competitor to participate in the cooperative pricing policy with its retailor to avoid such an embarrassing situation. If both suppliers join in the suggested pricing scheme in this research, then all players including the retailer are able to enjoy a certain degree of increased profit creating more demand in the market with the lower retailor prices. Therefore the suggested pricing scheme is beneficial even to the retail customers. More specifically, this reciprocal relation between two suppliers is continued until it reaches a certain equilibrium in terms of their wholesale pricing. That relation is extended to the retailer so that it changes its retail price so as to maximize its profit based on the new wholesale prices set by the two competing suppliers. Finally we prove that the profit achieved by the entire supply chain applying the suggested pricing scheme is maximized when the suppliers offer their competing products to its retailor with the prices equivalent to their production costs without adding any supplier`s margins. In such a case the suppliers are encouraged to take a part of the increased profit through the supply chain by adopting a new profit sharing program such as a revenue sharing transaction model or so-called a franchise transaction model to make the transactions feasible. With these kind of sharing programs, the suppliers are guaranteed to achieve the profits which are at least as large as the previous ones. Furthermore under the new pricing scheme, even the retail price tends to be lower than the previous one so that it is beneficial to the retail customers in the market eventually.
    번역하기

    We analyze an optimal pricing scheme of a product and its inherent dynamics to maximize the profit for the entire supply chain with two competing suppliers and a monopolistic retailer when the demand pattern is uncertain and the back-order is allowed ...

    We analyze an optimal pricing scheme of a product and its inherent dynamics to maximize the profit for the entire supply chain with two competing suppliers and a monopolistic retailer when the demand pattern is uncertain and the back-order is allowed in case. In this environment we assume that the products by the suppliers are substitutable each other with a certain degree even though their retail prices could be different each other in the market depending on the retailor`s decision. It is proved that each player in the supply chain is able to achieve increased profit comparing with the present one by following the suggested pricing scheme with some game theoretical process. In addition we show that the model appears to show equivalent results with the independent demand case if there is no substitutability between two products in our model. Under the circumstance the suggested pricing scheme for the products become mutually exclusive, which is consistent with many well-known results in the past researches. Also we show that the new retail price as well as the whole prices are quite sensitive to various market related parameters such as production costs by the suppliers and the relative size of each product`s retail market. From the standpoint of suppliers, the new pricing scheme suggests that each supplier in the supply chain should determine its wholesale price considering several relevant factors of the scheme to maximize the joint profit with its retailer when the competitor maintains a certain level of its wholesale price. On the other hand, the competitor is supposed to suffer a significant deal of loss in its demand and profit if it sticks to its existing wholesale price when the competing supplier changes its wholesale price following the scheme we suggested. Therefore the process to determine the wholesale prices are supposed to follow an game theoretical procedure considering the competing rival`s pricing policy. If a supplier deviates the scheme and apply some different wholesale price, it has to swallow a bitter pill. The magnitude of such an impact tends to depend on the degree of substitutability between two products as well as some other market related parameters such as the production costs of both sides and the price elasticity of the two products. As a result the scheme evokes a strong incentive for the competitor to participate in the cooperative pricing policy with its retailor to avoid such an embarrassing situation. If both suppliers join in the suggested pricing scheme in this research, then all players including the retailer are able to enjoy a certain degree of increased profit creating more demand in the market with the lower retailor prices. Therefore the suggested pricing scheme is beneficial even to the retail customers. More specifically, this reciprocal relation between two suppliers is continued until it reaches a certain equilibrium in terms of their wholesale pricing. That relation is extended to the retailer so that it changes its retail price so as to maximize its profit based on the new wholesale prices set by the two competing suppliers. Finally we prove that the profit achieved by the entire supply chain applying the suggested pricing scheme is maximized when the suppliers offer their competing products to its retailor with the prices equivalent to their production costs without adding any supplier`s margins. In such a case the suppliers are encouraged to take a part of the increased profit through the supply chain by adopting a new profit sharing program such as a revenue sharing transaction model or so-called a franchise transaction model to make the transactions feasible. With these kind of sharing programs, the suppliers are guaranteed to achieve the profits which are at least as large as the previous ones. Furthermore under the new pricing scheme, even the retail price tends to be lower than the previous one so that it is beneficial to the retail customers in the market eventually.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 박해철, "수요가 불확실한 대여산업의 거래모형" 한국경영학회 38 (38): 1115-1132, 2009

    2 박해철, "대여산업 공급사슬의 최적 수입공유모형" 한국경영과학회 34 (34): 55-69, 2009

    3 Lee, E, "Vertical Strategic Interaction: Implications for Channel Pricing Strategy" 16 : 185-207, 1997

    4 Wu, C., "Vertical Integration with Price-Setting Competitive News-vendors" 38 : 581-610, 2007

    5 Mortimer,J, "Vertical Contracts in the Video Rental Industry, working paper" Department of Economics, Harvard University 2004

    6 Cachon, G. P., "Supply Chain Coordination with Revenue Sharing Contracts:Strengths and Limitations" 51 : 30-44, 2005

    7 Dana, J, "Revenue Sharing and Vertical Control in the Video Rental Industry" 59 : 223-245, 2001

    8 Tang, C. S, "Rental Duration and Rental Price under Retail Competition" 187 : 806-828, 2008

    9 Dada, M., "Pricing and the Newsvendor Problem:A Review with Extensions" 47 : 183-194, 1999

    10 Bernstein, F, "Pricing and Replenishment Strategies in a Distribution System with Competing Retailers, working paper" Department of Economics, Columbia University 1999

    1 박해철, "수요가 불확실한 대여산업의 거래모형" 한국경영학회 38 (38): 1115-1132, 2009

    2 박해철, "대여산업 공급사슬의 최적 수입공유모형" 한국경영과학회 34 (34): 55-69, 2009

    3 Lee, E, "Vertical Strategic Interaction: Implications for Channel Pricing Strategy" 16 : 185-207, 1997

    4 Wu, C., "Vertical Integration with Price-Setting Competitive News-vendors" 38 : 581-610, 2007

    5 Mortimer,J, "Vertical Contracts in the Video Rental Industry, working paper" Department of Economics, Harvard University 2004

    6 Cachon, G. P., "Supply Chain Coordination with Revenue Sharing Contracts:Strengths and Limitations" 51 : 30-44, 2005

    7 Dana, J, "Revenue Sharing and Vertical Control in the Video Rental Industry" 59 : 223-245, 2001

    8 Tang, C. S, "Rental Duration and Rental Price under Retail Competition" 187 : 806-828, 2008

    9 Dada, M., "Pricing and the Newsvendor Problem:A Review with Extensions" 47 : 183-194, 1999

    10 Bernstein, F, "Pricing and Replenishment Strategies in a Distribution System with Competing Retailers, working paper" Department of Economics, Columbia University 1999

    11 Choi,S.C, "Price Competition in a Channel Structure with a Common Retailer" 10 : 271-296, 1991

    12 Johnson, L. A, "Operations Research in Production Planning, Scheduling, and Inventory Control" John Wiley and Sons Inc 1974

    13 Chen,Y, "Oligopoly Price Determination and Resale Price Maintenance" 30 : 441-455, 1999

    14 Cachon, G. P, "Matching Supply with Demand, 2nd ed" McGraw-Hill 2009

    15 Carlton.D.W, "Market Behavior with Demand Uncertainty and Price Inflexibility" 68 : 571-587, 1978

    16 Silver, E.A., "Inventory Management and Production Planning and Scheduling, 3rd. ed" John Wiley 1998

    17 Trivedi,M, "Distribution Channels:An Extension of Exclusive Relationship" 44 : 896-909, 1998

    18 Dana,J, "Competition in Price and Availability when Availability is Unobservable" 32 : 497-513, 2001

    19 Martinez de Albeniz, "Competing for Shelf Space" 20 : 32-46, 2007

    20 Cachon, G. P, "Competing Manufactures in a Retail Supply Chain:On Contractual Form and Coordination" 56 : 571-589, 2010

    21 Ingene, C.A, "Channel Coordination when Retailers Compete" 14 : 360-377, 1995

    22 Varian,H, "Buying,Sharing,and Renting Information Goods" 48 : 473-488, 2000

    23 Furman,P, "At Blockbuster Video, A Fast Fix Moves Flicks"

    24 McCardle, K., "Advance Booking Discount Programs under Retail Competition" 50 : 701-708, 2004

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.45 1.45 1.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.64 1.69 2.793 0.2
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼