RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Revisiting the Hanwoo Meat Yield Index: A Perspective from Genetic Improvement

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109957463

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study aimed to evaluate the limitations and inconsistencies of the current meat yield index used in Hanwoo (Korean native cattle) from a genetic improvement perspective and to propose an alternative index. The current meat yield index is calculated as the proportion of estimated retail meat, derived from carcass traits such as CWT, EMA, and BFT, relative to total carcass weight. Nevertheless, under the current formulation, an increase in carcass weight may unexpectedly lead to a lower yield index. This was reflected in negative correlations between carcass weight and the meat yield index for both phenotypes (-0.325) and genomic estimated genomic breeding values (-0.137). Even in the highest gEBV quartile group for carcass weight, the proportion of animals classified as Yield Grade A remained low (21%), suggesting a misalignment between selection goals and grade outcomes. Furthermore, the prediction accuracy of yield grade using carcass weight gEBV was only 53.0%, whereas marbling score gEBV predicted quality grade with higher accuracy (61.6%). To address this mismatch, we proposed an alternative yield index that excludes dividing by carcass weight, resulting in a simplified formula based on estimated retail meat weight. The new index showed a strong positive correlation with carcass weight gEBV (0.792), indicating a better alignment with selection objectives. These findings suggest that the current yield index inadequately reflects genetic merit and that consumer-visible grades may fail to capture the actual improvements achieved through breeding. The proposed index offers a simple yet effective alternative, improving both interpretability and consistency.
    번역하기

    This study aimed to evaluate the limitations and inconsistencies of the current meat yield index used in Hanwoo (Korean native cattle) from a genetic improvement perspective and to propose an alternative index. The current meat yield index is calculat...

    This study aimed to evaluate the limitations and inconsistencies of the current meat yield index used in Hanwoo (Korean native cattle) from a genetic improvement perspective and to propose an alternative index. The current meat yield index is calculated as the proportion of estimated retail meat, derived from carcass traits such as CWT, EMA, and BFT, relative to total carcass weight. Nevertheless, under the current formulation, an increase in carcass weight may unexpectedly lead to a lower yield index. This was reflected in negative correlations between carcass weight and the meat yield index for both phenotypes (-0.325) and genomic estimated genomic breeding values (-0.137). Even in the highest gEBV quartile group for carcass weight, the proportion of animals classified as Yield Grade A remained low (21%), suggesting a misalignment between selection goals and grade outcomes. Furthermore, the prediction accuracy of yield grade using carcass weight gEBV was only 53.0%, whereas marbling score gEBV predicted quality grade with higher accuracy (61.6%). To address this mismatch, we proposed an alternative yield index that excludes dividing by carcass weight, resulting in a simplified formula based on estimated retail meat weight. The new index showed a strong positive correlation with carcass weight gEBV (0.792), indicating a better alignment with selection objectives. These findings suggest that the current yield index inadequately reflects genetic merit and that consumer-visible grades may fail to capture the actual improvements achieved through breeding. The proposed index offers a simple yet effective alternative, improving both interpretability and consistency.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼