RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Study of the Northeast Asia’s Confidence Building Mechanism on Geo-Strategic Perspective

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106064426

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      After the end of the Cold War, a conception to form regional economic community such as ASEAN or even regional political community such as European Union was suggested in Northeast Asia for a long time. And scholars from Korea, China and Japan have been searching for appropriate measures for decades to implement this scheme. Nonetheless, the North Korean nuclear issue, China’s rapid economic and military growth that alarms the neighboring states, and the historical scars left by the Imperial Japan are remained as major obstacles to the implementation of regional community in Northeast Asia.
      However, there have been changes in Northeast Asia that generate significant impacts on the regional order in the first half of 2018. First, the North Korean nuclear issue, the largest security concern of the region, is finding a clue to the solution as the states involved with the issue embarked on denuclearizing North Korea through peaceful means. On the other hand, the U.S.-China trade war spilled over to other areas, escalating the two powers’ strategic competition. The former case has increased the possibility of accelerating regional economic cooperation with North Korea as well as establishing peace regime on the Korean peninsula. Also, the latter case has steered China to launch a more conciliatory foreign policy to North Korea and Japan, which ultimately gives an impetus to regional cooperation.
      This article discusses the possibility of a shift in the regional order from conventional geopolitics to geo-economics that pursues coexistence and prosperity in Northeast Asia.
      Also, I intend to look into some constraint factors and draw out possible solutions.
      번역하기

      After the end of the Cold War, a conception to form regional economic community such as ASEAN or even regional political community such as European Union was suggested in Northeast Asia for a long time. And scholars from Korea, China and Japan have be...

      After the end of the Cold War, a conception to form regional economic community such as ASEAN or even regional political community such as European Union was suggested in Northeast Asia for a long time. And scholars from Korea, China and Japan have been searching for appropriate measures for decades to implement this scheme. Nonetheless, the North Korean nuclear issue, China’s rapid economic and military growth that alarms the neighboring states, and the historical scars left by the Imperial Japan are remained as major obstacles to the implementation of regional community in Northeast Asia.
      However, there have been changes in Northeast Asia that generate significant impacts on the regional order in the first half of 2018. First, the North Korean nuclear issue, the largest security concern of the region, is finding a clue to the solution as the states involved with the issue embarked on denuclearizing North Korea through peaceful means. On the other hand, the U.S.-China trade war spilled over to other areas, escalating the two powers’ strategic competition. The former case has increased the possibility of accelerating regional economic cooperation with North Korea as well as establishing peace regime on the Korean peninsula. Also, the latter case has steered China to launch a more conciliatory foreign policy to North Korea and Japan, which ultimately gives an impetus to regional cooperation.
      This article discusses the possibility of a shift in the regional order from conventional geopolitics to geo-economics that pursues coexistence and prosperity in Northeast Asia.
      Also, I intend to look into some constraint factors and draw out possible solutions.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이상만, "핵심 국가이익의 충돌과 타협의 메카니즘 고찰: 미·중 관계에 대한 분석을 중심으로" 21세기정치학회 27 (27): 189-210, 2017

      2 Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China, "李克强总理与欧盟执行委员会主席通话 强调要共同应对贸易保护主义" Ministry of Commerce of the People's Republic of China

      3 谭晶晶, "李克强会见韩国总统文在寅" Xinhua News Agency

      4 Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, "习近平会见日本首相安倍晋三"

      5 Lanzhou News Net, "中日签署180亿美元协议 涵盖地方政府, 金融机构和企业之间50余项合作"

      6 Moreland, W., "“Strategic competition” with China—Necessary but not sufficient" Brookings Institute

      7 "What to do about China’s “sharp power”"

      8 "Trump warns North Korea of ‘fire and fury’"

      9 Sami, M., "Towards Geopolitical Analysis of Geoeconomic Processes" 23 (23): 2018

      10 "The U.S. and China are on the brink of Cold War 2.0. This is how to avoid it"

      1 이상만, "핵심 국가이익의 충돌과 타협의 메카니즘 고찰: 미·중 관계에 대한 분석을 중심으로" 21세기정치학회 27 (27): 189-210, 2017

      2 Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China, "李克强总理与欧盟执行委员会主席通话 强调要共同应对贸易保护主义" Ministry of Commerce of the People's Republic of China

      3 谭晶晶, "李克强会见韩国总统文在寅" Xinhua News Agency

      4 Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, "习近平会见日本首相安倍晋三"

      5 Lanzhou News Net, "中日签署180亿美元协议 涵盖地方政府, 金融机构和企业之间50余项合作"

      6 Moreland, W., "“Strategic competition” with China—Necessary but not sufficient" Brookings Institute

      7 "What to do about China’s “sharp power”"

      8 "Trump warns North Korea of ‘fire and fury’"

      9 Sami, M., "Towards Geopolitical Analysis of Geoeconomic Processes" 23 (23): 2018

      10 "The U.S. and China are on the brink of Cold War 2.0. This is how to avoid it"

      11 Dedman, M. J., "The Origins and Development of the European Union 1945–95" Routledge 1996

      12 U.S. Department of Defense, "The National Defense Strategy of the United States of America: Sharpening the American Military’s Competitive Edge"

      13 Han, Y. S., "South Korea’s 70-Year Endeavor for Foreign Policy, National Defense, and Unification" Palgrave Macmillan 2018

      14 Kozinets, Andrei, "Russia’s ‘turn to the East’"

      15 Dagbaev, E. D., "Regions and new eastern policy of Russia" 1 : 2015

      16 The Associated Press, "North Korea threatens ‘enveloping fire’ around Guam after Trump warning"

      17 The White House, "National Security Strategy 2017"

      18 Lee, S. O., "Geopolitical economy and the production of territory: The case of US–China geopolitical-economic competition in Asia" 50 (50): 2018

      19 Glassman, J., "Geopolitical economies of development and democratization in East Asia: Themes, concepts, and geographies" 50 (50): 2018

      20 "Full text of the Trump-Kim joint statement"

      21 "Full declaration of North and South Korean summit"

      22 Lu H., "FOCAC Beijing summit shows China’s approach, dedication to Africa"

      23 Holst, J. J., "European security and confidence-building measures" 19 (19): 1977

      24 Allison, G., "Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides's Trap?" Houghton Mifflin 2017

      25 Carter, A., "Defense Sec. Ashton Carter Highlights DoD Accomplishments"

      26 Heer, P., "Containment and China: What Would Kennan Do?"

      27 Alford, J., "Confidence‐building measures in Europe: The military aspects" 19 (19): 1979

      28 Holst, J. J., "Confidence‐building measures a conceptual framework" 25 (25): 1983

      29 Brayton, A. A., "Confidence-Building Measures in European Security" 36 (36): 1980

      30 Janice K. M, Heppell, "Confidence Bulding Measures in Northeast Asia: Examining Multilateral and Bilateral Dynamics at Work" 1994

      31 Snyder, S., "Confidence Building Measures in the South China Sea" Pacific Forum CSIS 2001

      32 Ben-Dor, G., "Confidence Building Measures in the Middle East" Westview 1994

      33 Mason, Simon J. A., "Confidence Building Measures (CBMs) in Peace Processes in Managing Peace Processes: Process related questions A handbook for AU practitioners, Volume 1" African Union and the Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue 2013

      34 Giorgio Spagnol, "Cold War 2.0"

      35 Park, J. W., "Chinese military aircraft enters S. Korea's air defense identification zone for sixth time this year"

      36 Nam, M. W., "China and Japan agree on massive economic cooperation including development of the third state’s infrastructure(中·日, 제3국 인프라 공동개발 등 대규모 경제협력 합의)"

      37 David Rosenberg, "Brace for Cold War 2.0: Trump’s China Offensive Isn’t Just About Trade"

      38 Borawski, John, "Avoiding war in the nuclear age. Confidence-building measures for crisis stability" Westview Press 1986

      39 Askandar, K., "ASEAN and conflict management: The formative years of 1967–1976" 6 (6): 1994

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼