중·한 무역 거래상 대금결제 결정요인에 대한 위험 평가 분석 -중국 청도 지역을 중심으로- = Risk Assessment Analysis on the International Trade Settlement between China and Korea -focusing on international trade settlement between Qingdao, China and Korea|RISS 상세보기

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Through international trade activities the enterprises can expand
export market and obtain necessary opportunities for better
development. Compared with domestic trade, international trade is
more complex and risky, risks are existed almost in every procedure
of international trade practice. As a key procedure of international
trade practice, international trade settlement is closely related to
whether the enterprise can successfully obtain the corresponding trade
revenues.
China and Korea are close neighbors and Korea has been an
important trade partner of China. The trade volume between the two
countries has been increased steadily in the past few years and in
2015 it reached 227.38 billion US dollars. There are unique features of
product structure and trade patterns between China and Korea, and
the risks factors which affect the international settlement between the
two countries also have corresponding characteristics.
- 102 -
Therefore, it is very important to research how to enhance the
market competitiveness of China's foreign trade enterprises and
ensure good trade relations between the two countries at the same
time. Enterprises need to identify and evaluate the risk of
international settlement between the two countries, strengthen the
risk management capacity and reasonably avoid the risks of
international trade settlement.
By analyzing the current situation and main characteristics of trade
settlement between China and Korea and identifying the risks factors
faced by Chinese enterprises, the main purpose of this paper is to
establish risks evaluation system of international trade settlement. In
this paper, we use a variety of research methods to evaluate different
risks of international trade settlement and apply the evaluate results
to strengthen the enterprise's ability to prevent international
settlement risks.
Firstly, in this paper, we discussed the concepts and main content
of different international settlement methods, and then summarized the
advantages and disadvantages of different settlement methods from
seller and buyer's point of view respectively.
Secondly, we stated current situation, trade volume and trade
structure between China and Korea, and then analyzed the main
features and existed problems in the international trade settlement
activities between the two countries. On the basis of this, by using
factor analysis, logical analysis and qualitative analysis methods to
analyze the factors that effect the international trade settlement's
- 103 -
risks and guide enterprises to identify the international settlement
risks.
After that, this paper established the risks evaluation index system
of international trade settlement and designed the risk evaluation
model. The primary level of international trade settlement risks faced
by enterprises include national risk, foreign exchange risk, contract
transaction risk and business operation risk, and further more we
decomposed each primary risk index into different numbers of
secondary risk indicators.
Finally, we applied expert survey method, analytic hierarchy process
(AHP) and the combination of qualitative analysis and quantitative
analysis methods to evaluate different factors of international
settlement risks. Furthermore, combined with the actual business
situation between China and Korea to evaluate the results of the
above risks analysis. By supplying the analysis results, we hope to
improve the identification ability of international settlement risks of
the enterprises and provide a theoretical basis for enterprises to
effectively measure the international settlement risks and choose
reasonable international trade settlement method to avoid international
trade settlement risks.

번역하기

목차 (Table of Contents)

Ⅰ.서 론 ················································································································1
1. 연구배경과 연구목적 ···············································································1
1) 연구 배경 ····························································································1
2) 연구 목적 ····························································································3
2. 연구방법과 연구범위 ···············································································4

Ⅰ.서 론 ················································································································1
1. 연구배경과 연구목적 ···············································································1
1) 연구 배경 ····························································································1
2) 연구 목적 ····························································································3
2. 연구방법과 연구범위 ···············································································4
1) 연구 방법 ····························································································4
2) 연구 범위 ····························································································5
3. 선행 연구 ···································································································6
Ⅱ.무역 대금결제 방식에 관한 고찰 ·····················································12
1. 송금 방식 ·································································································13
1) 송금방식 ····························································································13
2) 송금방식의 특징 ··············································································14
2. 추심 결제 방식 ·······················································································15
1) 추심 결제 방식 ················································································15
2) 추심 결제 방식의 특징 ··································································16
3. 신용장 거래 방식 ···················································································18
1) 신용장 거래 방식 ············································································18
2) 신용장 거래 방식의 특징 ······························································19
4. 기타 무역 대금결제 방식 ·····································································20
1) 국제 팩토링 ······················································································20
2) 포페이팅 ····························································································21
5. 무역 대금결제 방식의 선택 요인과 평가 ·········································23
1) 선택 요인 ··························································································23
2) 무역 대금결제 방식의 선택요인 비교 평가 ······························29
Ⅲ.중·한간 수출입과 무역 대금결제 방식의 현황 분석 ·············33
1. 중·한 수출입 현황 ·················································································33
1) 중·한 수출입액 ·················································································33
2) 중·한 수출입 상품구조 ···································································34
2. 중국 청도와 한국의 수출입 현황 ·······················································38
- II -
1) 중국 청도의 한국 수출 현황 ························································39
2) 중국 청도의 한국 수입 현황 ························································41
3. 중국 청도와 한국의 대금결제 현황 분석 ·········································43
1) 중국 청도의 한국 수출 대금결제 방식 ······································43
2) 중국 청도의 한국 수입 대금결제 방식 ······································46
Ⅳ.중·한 무역 대금결제 결정요인에 대한 위험 평가 분석 ········50
1. 평가 원칙 ·································································································51
1) 과학적인 평가지표 체계 구축 ······················································51
2) 전면적인 평가 ··················································································51
3) 체계적인 평가 ··················································································51
2. 무역 대금결제 위험요인의 특정 ·························································52
1) 거시적 위험 ······················································································54
(1) 국가 위험 ··················································································54
(2) 외환 위험 ··················································································55
2) 미시적 위험 ······················································································58
(1) 계약 거래 위험 ········································································59
(2) 기업 자체의 경영 위험 ···························································62
3. 무역 대금결제 위험의 평가 방법과 평가 분석 ·······························64
1) 평가 방법 ··························································································64
2) 무역 대금결제 위험 계층 분석 모델 ··········································67
3) 무역 대금결제 위험 요인별 위험 평가 분석 ····························69
(1) 1차 위험요인의 가중 산정 ····················································70
(2) 2차 위험요인의 가중 산정 ····················································73
(3) 무역 대금결제의 위험 분석 결과 ·········································79
4. 청도와 한국의 대금결제 위험 분석에 대한 시사점 ·······················83
1) 중국 청도의 한국에 대한 수출 대금결제 ··································84
2) 중국 청도의 한국에 대한 수입 대금결제 ··································87
Ⅴ.결 론 ··············································································································92
참고 문헌 ··············································································································96
Abstract ··············································································································101
부록: 위험 지표 비교 평점 설문지 ······························································104