경영판단행위와 형법상 배임죄

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In contrast with argument that demanding for admission of criminal responsibility against director’s judgements in business, in these days there are argument that objecting to director’s punishment by breach crime of trust, because the excessive intervenes of criminal law in ares of the coporate management restrains the creative challenge of directors.
With regard to director’s liability for business judgement, the argument for adopting the business judgement rule as limitation logic into whether breach of trust is established or not, has been discussed for along time.
The business judgement rule, having developed in accordance with the USA case law, state that the director shall not be held liable for any action or failure to take action for duties he performed in his office. So to speak, if a director manages in ways he believes to be in the best interest of corporation, as long as this does not involve fraud or other illegal conduct, abuse of discretion, and waste of corporate assets, the management’s position is vindicated.
In connection with introducing this rule in the area of criminal law of malfeasance, there are arguments for adopting this rule, on the contrary, argumenmt againstg doing. Also among the former argument, there are many opinions in respect of introducing this rule as what factor in requsite for establishment of crime breach of trust. These are the argument for adopting the rule as the factor to disclaim the intention for the breach of trust, and the argument for adoption the rule as the material for deciding whether director violates the duties or not, and the argument for adoption this rule the principal of the law for acceptable risk, and the argument for adopting business judgement rule by revising ‘special breach of trust’ at Commercial Code Article 622.
Present, many professors insist that it is not necessary to introduce the business judgement rule as the handy analysis tool for judging criminal charge of director. And I think so. The problems about the criminal responsibility against director’s acts in business could be settled through interpreting restrictively the establishment requisites of the breach crime of trust of criminal Act.
Consequently the directors’s sincere and fair business judgement is not applicable to trust breaching. But if directors violate this duties in business judgement, they should be punished by breach crime of trust. In this conclusion, it is same as case of applying the business judgement rule. In connection with the dabate whether director’s business judgement constitute a crime of ocupational breach of trust, it is desirable to solve this problem by revising ‘special breach of trust at Commercial Code Article 622 in way of defining vagueness of this provision, so by applying not Criminal law but Commercial law to the responsibility against director’s business act.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서언
• Ⅱ. 경영판단행위와 형법상 배임죄
• Ⅲ. 경영판단행위의 업무상 배임죄 성립여부
• Ⅳ. 경영판단원칙의 도입여부
• Ⅴ. 결언
• 참고문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 노명선, "회사범죄에 관한 연구 – 주식회사 임직원의 형사책임을 중심으로-" 1999

2 박상기, "형법각론" 박영사 2006

3 배종대, "형법각론" 홍문사 2006

4 백형구, "형법각론"

5 정성근, "형법각론" 삼지원 2002

6 오영근, "형법각론" 박영사 2009

7 정영일, "형법각론" 박영사 2008

8 이재상, "형법각론" 박영사 2009

9 임웅, "형법각론" 법문사 2009

10 김성돈, "형법각론" SKKUP 2009

11 손동권, "형법각론" 율곡출판사 2005

12 이찬엽, "판례상 이사의 임무 해태 및 위반에 따른 배임죄 적용에 대한 검토" 동북아법연구소 5 (5): 285-311, 2012

13 임중호, "익헌박정근박사화갑기념논문집" 1990

14 강동범, "이사의 경영판단과 업무상 배임" 법학연구소 14 (14): 33-55, 2010

15 강동욱, "이사 등의 경영행위에 대한 배임죄의 성립범위 -객관적 구성요건의 해석을 중심으로-" 한양법학회 24 (24): 3-24, 2013

16 이규훈, "업무상배임죄와 경영판단" 한국항사판례연구회 (13) : 2006

17 김일수, "새로쓴 형법각론" 박영사 2009

18 송호신, "상법상의 회사관계범죄에 대한 연구 : 벌칙조항의 활성화 방안을 중심으로" 한양대학교 대학원 2002

19 최준선, "상법상 특별배임죄규정의 개정방향" 한국경제법학회 11 (11): 89-122, 2012

20 조기영, "배임죄의 제한해석과 경영판단의 원칙- 경영판단 원칙 도입론 비판 -" 한국형사법학회 19 (19): 2007

21 허일태, "배임죄에서의 행위주체와 손해의 개념" 한국비교형사법학회 6 (6): 137-158, 2004

22 류전철, "배임죄에서 재산상 손해발생의 위험" 법학연구소 30 (30): 107-130, 2010

23 박성민, "배임죄에 있어 경영판단 원칙의 도입여부에 대한 검토" 한국비교형사법학회 16 (16): 1-22, 2014

24 임재연, "미국기업법" 박영사 2009

25 안경옥, "김일수교수화갑기념논문집" 2006

26 이무선, "기업경영 과정에서 발생한 회사의 손해에 대한 이사의 책임과 배임죄의 성부" 법무부 (51) : 104-136, 2010

27 장성원, "경영판단행위에 대한 배임죄의 적용 - 중소기업사례를 중심으로 -" 한국법정책학회 13 (13): 871-905, 2013

28 최승재, "경영판단의 항변과 기업경영진의 배임죄의 성부"

29 오경식, "경영판단의 원칙과 배임죄 성립여부에 대한 연구" 한국비교형사법학회 15 (15): 261-282, 2013

30 이경열, "경영판단의 과오와 업무상배임죄의 성부" 법조협회 55 (55): 122-159, 2006

31 강동욱, "경영판단원칙과 배임죄" 법무부 (62) : 57-79, 2013

32 이상돈, "경영과 형법" 법문사 2011