There are two viewpoints that people would analyze the literature on the end of the Japanese imperialism as they criticize the existing viewpoint. Kim, Jae-yong said that we must find 'immanent logics(the subject's intention and the spontaneous agreem...
There are two viewpoints that people would analyze the literature on the end of the Japanese imperialism as they criticize the existing viewpoint. Kim, Jae-yong said that we must find 'immanent logics(the subject's intention and the spontaneous agreement about Fascist)' Ryu, Bo-sun indicated that the pro-Japanese literary men were bewitched unconsciously by the Fascism on Japanese imperialism and Kang, Sang-hee criticized the viewpoint of judging the pro-Japanese literature on the basis of the angle of nationalism.
In this paper, I studied on the Production-novel of Yi, Gi-young, DongChunHong(1942), GwangSanChon(1943). The following is a studying result.
First, the Production-novel of Yi, Gi-young expressed to the ideology of superintendence but the immanent logic of his works on the Marxism of the past. An author viewed the present age through the concept of 'labor' or 'production'
Second, it is out of balance and was broken to pieces that the 'narrtive logic' on the Mining-novel of Yi, Gi-young. I can deduce the fact that he has not accept constructively the ideology of superintendence by 'comments on literature' Japanese imperialism.
This two conclusions are seemed that they are contradictory to each other, but we can understand that it is conscious or unconscious collision that were made by the ideology of superintendence and his own conviction.