RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    효과적인 협동학습의 기본요소에 관한 탐색적 연구

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3063303

    • 저자

      김광휘 (부산대학교 교육학과 강사)

    • 발행기관
    • 학술지명
    • 권호사항
    • 발행연도

      1995

    • 작성언어

      Korean

    • KDC

      370.000

    • 자료형태

      학술저널

    • 수록면

      1-17(17쪽)

    • 제공처
    • 중단사유

      KISS의 원문 서비스 중단에 따라, 학술지명을 클릭하여 [복사/대출] 서비스를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    There is still a great deal of confusion and disagreement about why cooperative learning methods affect achievement and even more important, under what conditions cooperative learning has these affects.
    Negative effect of cooperation learning are rich-get richer effect, free-ricer effect and sucker effect. To minimize those effect, motivational perspectives on cooperative learning focuse primarily on die group reward and social cohesion According to socal identity theory, intergroup bias on cooperative learning is minimized by regroupings. Therefore four conditions are essential if the achievement effect of cooperative learning are to be realize. First, the cooperating groups must have a group reward. Second, the members of cooperative group must acquire cooperative skill. Thud, cooperative groups have cooperative task. fourth, cooperative groups ate periodically regrouped.
    Each of the perspectives on cooperative learning contributes to more complex understanding of how cooperative learning affects student achievement. Until recently, researchers have tended to wok on paralled track. It is now time to look beyond usual disciplinary boundaries to consider more broadly how cooperation among students can enhance their learning.
    번역하기

    There is still a great deal of confusion and disagreement about why cooperative learning methods affect achievement and even more important, under what conditions cooperative learning has these affects. Negative effect of cooperation learning are ric...

    There is still a great deal of confusion and disagreement about why cooperative learning methods affect achievement and even more important, under what conditions cooperative learning has these affects.
    Negative effect of cooperation learning are rich-get richer effect, free-ricer effect and sucker effect. To minimize those effect, motivational perspectives on cooperative learning focuse primarily on die group reward and social cohesion According to socal identity theory, intergroup bias on cooperative learning is minimized by regroupings. Therefore four conditions are essential if the achievement effect of cooperative learning are to be realize. First, the cooperating groups must have a group reward. Second, the members of cooperative group must acquire cooperative skill. Thud, cooperative groups have cooperative task. fourth, cooperative groups ate periodically regrouped.
    Each of the perspectives on cooperative learning contributes to more complex understanding of how cooperative learning affects student achievement. Until recently, researchers have tended to wok on paralled track. It is now time to look beyond usual disciplinary boundaries to consider more broadly how cooperation among students can enhance their learning.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼