RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      生命 身體에 害를 입은 경우의 損害額算定 方式  :  호프만式 計算法의 批判과 그 代案을 中心으로 = The Method of Calculating the Amount of Compensation caused by Damages of Human Life and Body

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3147209

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      How should we ocmpute the amount of compensation for one's damages in the case of his injury or death which is caused by another person's tort such as a traffic accident or a criminal act?
      In regard of this issue, the civil law of Korea only stipulates that the wrongdoer, he who commits a tort, should compensate for the damage ordinarily resulting from the tort concerned' by converting it into money, without stipulating that what it is and that what the standard of the conversion is.
      As a result, we cannot bring this issue to a settlement without depending on a theory In the present theory and case law of Korea, the amount of compensation is computed according as how much income the victim loses as a result of his injury or death which is caused by the tort concerned.
      By the way, the income which the victim loses by the tort concerned is not what he has at present, but what he could earn in due sequence in the future if he were not injured or dead. Hence, to compensate for the loot future income at present, it is necessary to compute the present value of the lost future income.
      As a formula for this computation, the Hoffmann's method of computation is widely used in judicial practice.
      But this method contains several contradictions and is unreal and unreasonable. In fact, this method is unfair in the sense that it makes wrondoer give the victim too much.
      Therefore, to correct these contradictions involved in the Hoffmann's method, we should adopt more reasonable method, and I assert that the Leibnitz's mehtod of computation should be adopted as a more reasonable method.
      If we adopt the Leibnitz's mehtod, we can avoid all contradictions involved in the Hoffmann's method and we can be fair to both parties by compensating for the exact amount of the victim's lost future income.
      번역하기

      How should we ocmpute the amount of compensation for one's damages in the case of his injury or death which is caused by another person's tort such as a traffic accident or a criminal act? In regard of this issue, the civil law of Korea only stipulat...

      How should we ocmpute the amount of compensation for one's damages in the case of his injury or death which is caused by another person's tort such as a traffic accident or a criminal act?
      In regard of this issue, the civil law of Korea only stipulates that the wrongdoer, he who commits a tort, should compensate for the damage ordinarily resulting from the tort concerned' by converting it into money, without stipulating that what it is and that what the standard of the conversion is.
      As a result, we cannot bring this issue to a settlement without depending on a theory In the present theory and case law of Korea, the amount of compensation is computed according as how much income the victim loses as a result of his injury or death which is caused by the tort concerned.
      By the way, the income which the victim loses by the tort concerned is not what he has at present, but what he could earn in due sequence in the future if he were not injured or dead. Hence, to compensate for the loot future income at present, it is necessary to compute the present value of the lost future income.
      As a formula for this computation, the Hoffmann's method of computation is widely used in judicial practice.
      But this method contains several contradictions and is unreal and unreasonable. In fact, this method is unfair in the sense that it makes wrondoer give the victim too much.
      Therefore, to correct these contradictions involved in the Hoffmann's method, we should adopt more reasonable method, and I assert that the Leibnitz's mehtod of computation should be adopted as a more reasonable method.
      If we adopt the Leibnitz's mehtod, we can avoid all contradictions involved in the Hoffmann's method and we can be fair to both parties by compensating for the exact amount of the victim's lost future income.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ.사람의 값은 얼마인가
      • Ⅱ.人間價値의 法律的 評償方式
      • Ⅲ.中間利子 算定方式
      • Ⅳ.호프만式 計算法의 處構
      • Ⅴ.라이프닛쯔 計算方法의 登場
      • Ⅰ.사람의 값은 얼마인가
      • Ⅱ.人間價値의 法律的 評償方式
      • Ⅲ.中間利子 算定方式
      • Ⅳ.호프만式 計算法의 處構
      • Ⅴ.라이프닛쯔 計算方法의 登場
      • Ⅵ.호프만式 計算法이여 安寧
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼