RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    통신망 고도화에 따른 상호접속료 산정체계 개선방안 = A New Framework for Assessing Interconnection Charges with the Evolution of Telecommunications Networks

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82490851

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Recently, the telecommunications industry has faced fundamental changes. The competition in the telecom market has intensified according to service diversification due to voice and data integration, broadcasting and telecom convergence, and merger and acquisition of telecom operators. The networks evolve from circuit networks to next generation networks, such as BcN, 3G, 4G, and finally converge to All-IP networks. In addition, the Korean government has also presented new regulation policies in retail, wholesale, and spectrum allocation to promote competition and encourage investment. These trends are affecting Korean regulation policies, including the regulation of interconnection charges. The Korean regulatory agency uses a hybrid framework, that combines the rate of a top-down LRIC model and the slope calculated by the rates of a bottom-up LRIC model to assess interconnection charges. In this paper, we investigate the issues of the current framework for assessing interconnection charges in Korea in light of the rapid changes in the telecom industry. We show that investment in NTS or 3G may result in a decrease in operators` rates. The interconnection rate increases without network investment when traffic decreases. As a result, the current framework is limited in giving telecom operators incentive to increase network investment and use their networks efficiently. In addition, the top-down rate is out of date. The bottom-up model requires numerous, complicated simulations to compute the rates. We analyze the telecom regulation trends in the EU and propose a new framework for calculating the interconnection charge based on a glide-path method, a bottom-up model, and the concept of technology neutrality. The framework is clear and robust against the rapid changes in the telecom industry. In addition, we expect that the new framework can improve network efficiency because it excludes inefficient costs and derives operators` network investment with transparent regulations.
    번역하기

    Recently, the telecommunications industry has faced fundamental changes. The competition in the telecom market has intensified according to service diversification due to voice and data integration, broadcasting and telecom convergence, and merger and...

    Recently, the telecommunications industry has faced fundamental changes. The competition in the telecom market has intensified according to service diversification due to voice and data integration, broadcasting and telecom convergence, and merger and acquisition of telecom operators. The networks evolve from circuit networks to next generation networks, such as BcN, 3G, 4G, and finally converge to All-IP networks. In addition, the Korean government has also presented new regulation policies in retail, wholesale, and spectrum allocation to promote competition and encourage investment. These trends are affecting Korean regulation policies, including the regulation of interconnection charges. The Korean regulatory agency uses a hybrid framework, that combines the rate of a top-down LRIC model and the slope calculated by the rates of a bottom-up LRIC model to assess interconnection charges. In this paper, we investigate the issues of the current framework for assessing interconnection charges in Korea in light of the rapid changes in the telecom industry. We show that investment in NTS or 3G may result in a decrease in operators` rates. The interconnection rate increases without network investment when traffic decreases. As a result, the current framework is limited in giving telecom operators incentive to increase network investment and use their networks efficiently. In addition, the top-down rate is out of date. The bottom-up model requires numerous, complicated simulations to compute the rates. We analyze the telecom regulation trends in the EU and propose a new framework for calculating the interconnection charge based on a glide-path method, a bottom-up model, and the concept of technology neutrality. The framework is clear and robust against the rapid changes in the telecom industry. In addition, we expect that the new framework can improve network efficiency because it excludes inefficient costs and derives operators` network investment with transparent regulations.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 정보통신정책연구원, "통신서비스 정책의 이해" 법영사 2005

    2 장희선, "주파수의 경제적 가치를 고려한 할당대가 산정기준 분석" 대한산업공학회 34 (34): 216-222, 2008

    3 방송통신위원회, "전기통신설비의 상호접속기준. 방송통신위원회고시 제2008-129호"

    4 한국정보통신기술협회, "이동망 커버리지 비용산정 기준, 정보통신단체표준 TTAS.KO-01.0121"

    5 한국정보통신산업협회, "방송통신통계포털"

    6 방송통신위원회, "가입자선로의 공동활용기준. 방송통신위원회고시 제2008-48호"

    7 강병민, "가입자망의 설비제공대가 산정방안에 대한 연구" 정보통신정책학회 17 (17): 37-71, 2010

    8 Qualcomm, "UMTS/WCDMA Network Planning, 80-W0009-1 Rev B"

    9 OVUM, "The status of mobile termination regulation in Europe in 2009, OVUM"

    10 Moon-Soo Kim, "The Criteria, Procedure, and Classification of Traffic-Sensitive and Non-Traffic-Sensitive Components: A Case of CDMA Mobile System" 한국전자통신연구원 28 (28): 777-786, 2006

    1 정보통신정책연구원, "통신서비스 정책의 이해" 법영사 2005

    2 장희선, "주파수의 경제적 가치를 고려한 할당대가 산정기준 분석" 대한산업공학회 34 (34): 216-222, 2008

    3 방송통신위원회, "전기통신설비의 상호접속기준. 방송통신위원회고시 제2008-129호"

    4 한국정보통신기술협회, "이동망 커버리지 비용산정 기준, 정보통신단체표준 TTAS.KO-01.0121"

    5 한국정보통신산업협회, "방송통신통계포털"

    6 방송통신위원회, "가입자선로의 공동활용기준. 방송통신위원회고시 제2008-48호"

    7 강병민, "가입자망의 설비제공대가 산정방안에 대한 연구" 정보통신정책학회 17 (17): 37-71, 2010

    8 Qualcomm, "UMTS/WCDMA Network Planning, 80-W0009-1 Rev B"

    9 OVUM, "The status of mobile termination regulation in Europe in 2009, OVUM"

    10 Moon-Soo Kim, "The Criteria, Procedure, and Classification of Traffic-Sensitive and Non-Traffic-Sensitive Components: A Case of CDMA Mobile System" 한국전자통신연구원 28 (28): 777-786, 2006

    11 ofcom, "Review of BT’s network charge controls"

    12 KT, "Monthly Factsheet, 2010. 2"

    13 SK텔레콤, "Monthly Factsheet, 2009. 8"

    14 Grag, V. K, "IS-95 CDMA and cdma2000: Cellular/PCS Systems Implementation, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458"

    15 이종용, "IP 전화 확대에 대응한 유선망 NTS 비용 배부 분석: 일본을 중심으로" 24 (24): 120-130, 2009

    16 EU, "Commission recommendation on the regulatory treatment of fixed and mobile termination rates in the EU: Explanatory note"

    17 Qualcomm, "CDMA2000 Network Planning, 80-31480-1 X3"

    18 한국전자통신연구원, "Bottom-up 방식에 의한 표준접속원가모형 개발" 2006

    19 ofcom, "A New Pricing Framework for Openreach"

    20 "3G, 세상의 중심에 서다. (2008. 3. 11). 『디지털타임스』"

    21 KT, "2009년 3분기 추정결산실적" 2009

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2016-01-19 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean Telecommunications Policy Review -> International Telecommunications Policy Review KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2000-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.59 0.59 0.63
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.55 0.47 0.859 0.5
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼