RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    수업체제개발 및 설계의 최근 동향과 과제 -행동주의 패 러다임과 인주주 의 패러다임의 비교- = The Current Trends and Tasks of ISD -Behaviorism vs. cognitivism-

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101960035

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The main purpose of this study is critically analyzing the traditional ISD which is based on behavioral paradigm and referring to the characteristics of the new ISD which is based on the cognitive paradigm. Throughout this exploring, I make some suggestions for developing effective ISD. Behavioral ISD is based on behavioral psychology and experiment design research method, which are theoretical and methodological foundation respectively. It is criticized in term of its research methodology and practical utilization. In order to overcome these limitations, cognitive ISD appeared in late 1970``s and early 1980``s. In this article, I investigate the premises, underlying assumption, and research issues of cognitive ISD. And compare the characteristics of behavioral ISD and cognitive ISD. Throughout this exploring, I will suggest followings : First, we should understand the instructional development and design process accurately in terms of appropriate systems approach (systemic approach). And we should understand the characteristics, elements, and specific procedures of ISD based on cognitiveparadigm. Second, in developing the ISD, we should take into account its various social and culturalcontext. In short, we should try multidisciplinary approach or interdisciplinary approach in developing ISD. Third, we should establish special research institution which is responsible for the planning, implementing, managing, and evaluation of the research, development, and diffusion of ISD.
    번역하기

    The main purpose of this study is critically analyzing the traditional ISD which is based on behavioral paradigm and referring to the characteristics of the new ISD which is based on the cognitive paradigm. Throughout this exploring, I make some sugge...

    The main purpose of this study is critically analyzing the traditional ISD which is based on behavioral paradigm and referring to the characteristics of the new ISD which is based on the cognitive paradigm. Throughout this exploring, I make some suggestions for developing effective ISD. Behavioral ISD is based on behavioral psychology and experiment design research method, which are theoretical and methodological foundation respectively. It is criticized in term of its research methodology and practical utilization. In order to overcome these limitations, cognitive ISD appeared in late 1970``s and early 1980``s. In this article, I investigate the premises, underlying assumption, and research issues of cognitive ISD. And compare the characteristics of behavioral ISD and cognitive ISD. Throughout this exploring, I will suggest followings : First, we should understand the instructional development and design process accurately in terms of appropriate systems approach (systemic approach). And we should understand the characteristics, elements, and specific procedures of ISD based on cognitiveparadigm. Second, in developing the ISD, we should take into account its various social and culturalcontext. In short, we should try multidisciplinary approach or interdisciplinary approach in developing ISD. Third, we should establish special research institution which is responsible for the planning, implementing, managing, and evaluation of the research, development, and diffusion of ISD.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼