RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    WTO 農業協商과 우리나라의 開途國地位 問題 = Korea's Developing Country Status in the WTO Negotiations on Agriculture

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60201561

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Considering the relatively disadvantageous conditions of the developing countries, the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture provided special preferential treatment to the developing countries, that is, developing countries face less stringent commitments, having ten years rather than six to make the changes, and having to meet only two-thirds of the reduction targets. Having developing country status in the WTO, the Korean agricultural sector has faithfully implemented its commitments. Actually our status as a developing county in the last Uruguay Round helped us to smoothly implement the commitments. However, international society has continuously required us to participate the New Round as the status of developed country. Particularly international society's pressure on this issue has strongly increased since Korea's accession to OECD in 1998. Korea's Status in the WTO negotiations will be one of the big issue sooner or later. Considering low international competitiveness in agricultural sector and financial burden of the overall Korean economy, it is essential for us to participate in the WTO agricultural negotiation as a developing country. In particular, taking into account the negative effects of the market liberalization on agricultural sector, the maintenance of developing country status is one of the vital policy issues until the Korean agriculture can do gradual and flexible structural reform and infrastructure development with minimal loss of national economy. Thus it's time for us to prepare the effective strategies and tactics coping with the international challenges to our status in WTO negotiations on agriculture in order to minimize the negative impacts on agricultural sector.
    번역하기

    Considering the relatively disadvantageous conditions of the developing countries, the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture provided special preferential treatment to the developing countries, that is, developing countries face less stringent commit...

    Considering the relatively disadvantageous conditions of the developing countries, the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture provided special preferential treatment to the developing countries, that is, developing countries face less stringent commitments, having ten years rather than six to make the changes, and having to meet only two-thirds of the reduction targets. Having developing country status in the WTO, the Korean agricultural sector has faithfully implemented its commitments. Actually our status as a developing county in the last Uruguay Round helped us to smoothly implement the commitments. However, international society has continuously required us to participate the New Round as the status of developed country. Particularly international society's pressure on this issue has strongly increased since Korea's accession to OECD in 1998. Korea's Status in the WTO negotiations will be one of the big issue sooner or later. Considering low international competitiveness in agricultural sector and financial burden of the overall Korean economy, it is essential for us to participate in the WTO agricultural negotiation as a developing country. In particular, taking into account the negative effects of the market liberalization on agricultural sector, the maintenance of developing country status is one of the vital policy issues until the Korean agriculture can do gradual and flexible structural reform and infrastructure development with minimal loss of national economy. Thus it's time for us to prepare the effective strategies and tactics coping with the international challenges to our status in WTO negotiations on agriculture in order to minimize the negative impacts on agricultural sector.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 국제기구의 개도국분류 현황
    • 1. 일반현황
    • 2. 주요 국제기구의 개도국 분류기준과 동향
    • Ⅲ. 개도국지위와 관련한 대내외 여건변화
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 국제기구의 개도국분류 현황
    • 1. 일반현황
    • 2. 주요 국제기구의 개도국 분류기준과 동향
    • Ⅲ. 개도국지위와 관련한 대내외 여건변화
    • 1. 국내외 여건변화
    • 2. 우리나라의 경제 및 비경제적 지표 검토
    • 3. 우리나라의 농업여건 변화
    • Ⅳ. OECD 가입과 개도국지위
    • 1. OECD 가입과 개도국지위와의 관계
    • 2. 우리나라의 OECD 가입과 개도국지위
    • Ⅴ. WTO 농업협상과 개도국지위 확보방향
    • 1. WTO의 개도국 분류 논의동향
    • 2. WTO 농업협상에서 개도국지위 확보를 위한 대응방향
    • Ⅵ. 결론
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (계속평가)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2019-12-01 등재 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
    2018-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2017-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2016-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2015-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-06-08 학술지등록 한글명 : 통상법률
    외국어명 : International Trade Law
    KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.41 0.41 0.25
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.26 0.26 0.508 0.17
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼