RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      A simple clinical assessment of breast animation deformity following direct-to-implant breast reconstruction

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106434390

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background A high incidence of breast animation deformity (BAD) has been reported followingimmediate breast reconstruction with subpectorally placed implants. The aim of thisstudy was to assess and compare the incidence of BAD in women who underwent either subpectoralor prepectoral immediate breast reconstruction. Therefore, we developed a gradingtool and tested its reproducibility in a clinical setting.
      Methods Video recordings of 37 women who had undergone unilateral or bilateral immediatebreast reconstruction were evaluated by two consultant plastic surgeons. The degree ofBAD was assessed by our grading tool, named the Nipple, Surrounding Skin, Entire Breast(NSE) grading scale, which evaluates the degree of tissue distortion in three areas of thebreast. Blinded assessments were performed twice by each observer.
      Results Eighteen patients were reconstructed with subpectoral implant placement and 19with prepectoral implant placement. Using the NSE grading scale, we found a significant differencein the degree of BAD between the groups, in favor of patients who underwent prepectoralimmediate breast reconstruction (0.2 vs. 4, P=0.000). Inter- and intraobserver agreementwas moderate (74%) to strong (88%).
      Conclusions The incidence and severity of BAD was significantly lower in women reconstructedwith a prepectorally placed implant than in those who underwent subpectoral immediatebreast reconstruction. All patients reconstructed using the subpectoral techniquehad some degree of BAD. The inter- and intraobserver agreements were high when using theNSE grading scale, suggesting it is an easy-to-use, reproducible scale for assessing BAD inwomen who undergo immediate breast reconstruction.
      번역하기

      Background A high incidence of breast animation deformity (BAD) has been reported followingimmediate breast reconstruction with subpectorally placed implants. The aim of thisstudy was to assess and compare the incidence of BAD in women who underwent e...

      Background A high incidence of breast animation deformity (BAD) has been reported followingimmediate breast reconstruction with subpectorally placed implants. The aim of thisstudy was to assess and compare the incidence of BAD in women who underwent either subpectoralor prepectoral immediate breast reconstruction. Therefore, we developed a gradingtool and tested its reproducibility in a clinical setting.
      Methods Video recordings of 37 women who had undergone unilateral or bilateral immediatebreast reconstruction were evaluated by two consultant plastic surgeons. The degree ofBAD was assessed by our grading tool, named the Nipple, Surrounding Skin, Entire Breast(NSE) grading scale, which evaluates the degree of tissue distortion in three areas of thebreast. Blinded assessments were performed twice by each observer.
      Results Eighteen patients were reconstructed with subpectoral implant placement and 19with prepectoral implant placement. Using the NSE grading scale, we found a significant differencein the degree of BAD between the groups, in favor of patients who underwent prepectoralimmediate breast reconstruction (0.2 vs. 4, P=0.000). Inter- and intraobserver agreementwas moderate (74%) to strong (88%).
      Conclusions The incidence and severity of BAD was significantly lower in women reconstructedwith a prepectorally placed implant than in those who underwent subpectoral immediatebreast reconstruction. All patients reconstructed using the subpectoral techniquehad some degree of BAD. The inter- and intraobserver agreements were high when using theNSE grading scale, suggesting it is an easy-to-use, reproducible scale for assessing BAD inwomen who undergo immediate breast reconstruction.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Dyrberg DL, "Visualized pre- and subpectoral implant placement for immediate breast reconstruction" 8 (8): S251-S254, 2019

      2 Elmore JG, "Variability in radiologists’ interpretations of mammograms" 331 : 1493-1499, 1994

      3 "True random number service" Randomness and Integrity Services Ltd

      4 Landis JR, "The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data" 33 : 159-174, 1977

      5 Egeberg A, "The impact of breast implant location on the risk of capsular contraction" 77 : 255-259, 2016

      6 Becker H, "The impact of animation deformity on quality of life in post-mastectomy reconstruction patients" 37 : 531-536, 2017

      7 Strasser EJ, "Results of subglandular versus subpectoral augmentation over time : one surgeon’s observations" 26 : 45-50, 2006

      8 Cheffe MR, "Quantifying dynamic deformity after dual plane breast augmentation" 42 : 716-724, 2018

      9 Gabriel A, "Prepectoral revision breast reconstruction for treatment of implant-associated animation deformity : a review of 102 reconstructions" 38 : 519-526, 2018

      10 Gunnarsson GL, "Prepectoral hammock and direct-to-implant breast reconstruction in 10 minutes: a focus on technique" 6 : e1931-, 2018

      1 Dyrberg DL, "Visualized pre- and subpectoral implant placement for immediate breast reconstruction" 8 (8): S251-S254, 2019

      2 Elmore JG, "Variability in radiologists’ interpretations of mammograms" 331 : 1493-1499, 1994

      3 "True random number service" Randomness and Integrity Services Ltd

      4 Landis JR, "The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data" 33 : 159-174, 1977

      5 Egeberg A, "The impact of breast implant location on the risk of capsular contraction" 77 : 255-259, 2016

      6 Becker H, "The impact of animation deformity on quality of life in post-mastectomy reconstruction patients" 37 : 531-536, 2017

      7 Strasser EJ, "Results of subglandular versus subpectoral augmentation over time : one surgeon’s observations" 26 : 45-50, 2006

      8 Cheffe MR, "Quantifying dynamic deformity after dual plane breast augmentation" 42 : 716-724, 2018

      9 Gabriel A, "Prepectoral revision breast reconstruction for treatment of implant-associated animation deformity : a review of 102 reconstructions" 38 : 519-526, 2018

      10 Gunnarsson GL, "Prepectoral hammock and direct-to-implant breast reconstruction in 10 minutes: a focus on technique" 6 : e1931-, 2018

      11 Spear SL, "Outcome assessment of breast distortion following submuscular breast augmentation" 33 : 44-48, 2009

      12 Bertozzi N, "One-stage immediate breast reconstruction : a concise review" 2017 : 6486859-, 2017

      13 Fleiss JL, "Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters" 76 : 378-382, 1971

      14 Raghavan Vidya, "Management based on grading of animation deformity following implant-based subpectoral breast reconstruction" 대한성형외과학회 45 (45): 185-190, 2018

      15 Kummel S, "Jumping breast phenomenon following subcutaneous mastectomy: first description and grading of a well-known breast deformity" 13 : 354-358, 2018

      16 Gunnarsson GL, "How to perform a NAC sparing mastectomy using an ADM and an implant" 3 : 252-257, 2014

      17 Chatterjee A, "Early assessment of post-surgical outcomes with pre-pectoral breast reconstruction : a literature review and meta-analysis" 117 : 1119-1130, 2018

      18 Ibrahim AM, "Does acellular dermal matrix really improve aesthetic outcome in tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction?" 39 : 359-368, 2015

      19 Diana Lydia Dyrberg, "Breast animation deformity" 대한성형외과학회 46 (46): 7-15, 2019

      20 Fracol M, "An overview of animation deformity in prosthetic breast reconstruction" 8 : 95-101, 2019

      21 Chandarana MN, "Acellular dermal matrix in implant-based immediate breast reconstructions: a comparison of prepectoral and subpectoral approach" 7 (7): S64-S69, 2018

      22 Pelle-Ceravolo M, "A technique to decrease breast shape deformity during muscle contraction in submuscular augmentation mammaplasty" 28 : 288-294, 2004

      23 Cohen J, "A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales" 20 : 37-46, 1960

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-15 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한성형외과 학회지 -> Archives of Plastic Surgery
      외국어명 : Journal of The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons -> Archives of Plastic Surgery
      KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.12 0.12 0.12
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.12 0.11 0.335 0.02
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼