RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국어와 중국어 사이의 어휘 간섭 요인 박쥐말(Ⅱ) = False Friends(Faux Amis) between Korean and Chinese(Ⅱ)

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76481083

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Maeng (2004) discussed hindrances in communication caused by false friends based on the contrastive analysis of meaning. However, the analysis there had a limitation in that it heavily depended on the semantic contrast from an etymological point of view. In this study I adopt Seleskovitch's concept of three equivalent relationships in translation and attempt to overcome the limitation of my previous study. To be more specific, we demonstrate subtle pragmatic differences of signifie which are affected by those of lexical tone, social context, the direction of human relationship, class of words, collocation, etc. After that a wider range of contrastive analysis should be done by using a larger corpus. Finally I suggest that we continue to make an effort to reflect the analysis to the compilation of a false friends dictionary I a Chinese-Korean dictionary and a Korean-Chinese dictionary.
    번역하기

    Maeng (2004) discussed hindrances in communication caused by false friends based on the contrastive analysis of meaning. However, the analysis there had a limitation in that it heavily depended on the semantic contrast from an etymological point of vi...

    Maeng (2004) discussed hindrances in communication caused by false friends based on the contrastive analysis of meaning. However, the analysis there had a limitation in that it heavily depended on the semantic contrast from an etymological point of view. In this study I adopt Seleskovitch's concept of three equivalent relationships in translation and attempt to overcome the limitation of my previous study. To be more specific, we demonstrate subtle pragmatic differences of signifie which are affected by those of lexical tone, social context, the direction of human relationship, class of words, collocation, etc. After that a wider range of contrastive analysis should be done by using a larger corpus. Finally I suggest that we continue to make an effort to reflect the analysis to the compilation of a false friends dictionary I a Chinese-Korean dictionary and a Korean-Chinese dictionary.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Abstract
    • 중문초록
    • Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 근거
    • Ⅲ. 문맥어의 선택
    • Abstract
    • 중문초록
    • Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 근거
    • Ⅲ. 문맥어의 선택
    • Ⅳ. 관용적 번역어의 사용
    • Ⅴ. 나오는 말
    • 參考文獻
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼