RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    재벌오너 일가의 소유방정식: GS그룹과 LS그룹의 사례 = The Family Ownership in Korean Chaebols: A Comparative Study of GS Group and LS Group*

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106986605

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study analyzes the ways in which GS Group and LS Group, the two major Korean chaebols(the 8<sup>th</sup> and the 16<sup>th</sup> largest chaebol as of 2014), are owned by the family members.
    Unlike the cases in most other chaebols, both GS Group and LS Group had a unique, similar but somewhat different, ownership structure and, more significantly, a very large number of family members, belonging to, respectively, the Huh familiy and the Koo family, were involved in the ownership.
    In GS Group, around half the Group companies were organized into the holding company system and GS Corporation, the holding company, was collectively owned by the six Huh families. The remaining Group companies were divided into four groups headed by each of four key companies and these four companies were owned by each of four of the six Huh families. Similarly, in LS Group, around half the Group companies were owned by LS Corporation, the holding company, which, in turn, was collectively owned by the three Koo families. The remaining Group companies were divided into three groups headed by each of three key companies and, of these three companies, one was owned by all the three Koo families, one by two of the three families, and one by one of the three families.
    Within a unique ownership structure, a large number of family members participated in the ownership. In GS Group, a total of 57 members from the first, second and third generation were involved in the ownership of GS Corporation and the other four key companies. They belonged to the seven families of the first generation, which, in turn, consisted of the 21 families of the second generation. In LS Group, a total of 44 members from the first, second and third generation were shareholders in one or more of LS Corporation and the other three key companies. They belonged to the three families of the first generation, consisting of the 14 families of the second generation.
    The ‘segmented’ ownership structure and the ‘collective and individual’ family ownership in GS Group and LS Group are unique enough and it is expected that these cases would give a new insight in the study of the corporate governance in Korean chaebols.
    번역하기

    This study analyzes the ways in which GS Group and LS Group, the two major Korean chaebols(the 8<sup>th</sup> and the 16<sup>th</sup> largest chaebol as of 2014), are owned by the family members. Unlike the cases in most other ...

    This study analyzes the ways in which GS Group and LS Group, the two major Korean chaebols(the 8<sup>th</sup> and the 16<sup>th</sup> largest chaebol as of 2014), are owned by the family members.
    Unlike the cases in most other chaebols, both GS Group and LS Group had a unique, similar but somewhat different, ownership structure and, more significantly, a very large number of family members, belonging to, respectively, the Huh familiy and the Koo family, were involved in the ownership.
    In GS Group, around half the Group companies were organized into the holding company system and GS Corporation, the holding company, was collectively owned by the six Huh families. The remaining Group companies were divided into four groups headed by each of four key companies and these four companies were owned by each of four of the six Huh families. Similarly, in LS Group, around half the Group companies were owned by LS Corporation, the holding company, which, in turn, was collectively owned by the three Koo families. The remaining Group companies were divided into three groups headed by each of three key companies and, of these three companies, one was owned by all the three Koo families, one by two of the three families, and one by one of the three families.
    Within a unique ownership structure, a large number of family members participated in the ownership. In GS Group, a total of 57 members from the first, second and third generation were involved in the ownership of GS Corporation and the other four key companies. They belonged to the seven families of the first generation, which, in turn, consisted of the 21 families of the second generation. In LS Group, a total of 44 members from the first, second and third generation were shareholders in one or more of LS Corporation and the other three key companies. They belonged to the three families of the first generation, consisting of the 14 families of the second generation.
    The ‘segmented’ ownership structure and the ‘collective and individual’ family ownership in GS Group and LS Group are unique enough and it is expected that these cases would give a new insight in the study of the corporate governance in Korean chaebols.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 조동성, "한국재벌연구" 매일경제신문사 1990

    2 최정표, "한국재벌사연구" 해남 2014

    3 이한구, "한국재벌사" 대명출판사 2010

    4 김동운, "한국재벌과 지주회사체제: GS그룹과 LS그룹의 비교" 한국질서경제학회 17 (17): 1-25, 2014

    5 김동욱, "한국 재벌기업의 소유지분율 변화의 동태성과 기업가치" 한국금융공학회 11 (11): 91-115, 2012

    6 "코스모앤컴퍼니 (2005~2012), 감사보고서"

    7 김진방, "재벌의 소유구조" 나남출판 2005

    8 김동운, "재벌의 경영지배구조와 인맥 혼맥" 나남출판 2005

    9 서울신문사산업부, "재벌家 脈 ( 상 , 하 )" 무한 2007

    10 중앙일보경제 2 부, "재계를 움직이는 사람들" 중앙일보사 1996

    1 조동성, "한국재벌연구" 매일경제신문사 1990

    2 최정표, "한국재벌사연구" 해남 2014

    3 이한구, "한국재벌사" 대명출판사 2010

    4 김동운, "한국재벌과 지주회사체제: GS그룹과 LS그룹의 비교" 한국질서경제학회 17 (17): 1-25, 2014

    5 김동욱, "한국 재벌기업의 소유지분율 변화의 동태성과 기업가치" 한국금융공학회 11 (11): 91-115, 2012

    6 "코스모앤컴퍼니 (2005~2012), 감사보고서"

    7 김진방, "재벌의 소유구조" 나남출판 2005

    8 김동운, "재벌의 경영지배구조와 인맥 혼맥" 나남출판 2005

    9 서울신문사산업부, "재벌家 脈 ( 상 , 하 )" 무한 2007

    10 중앙일보경제 2 부, "재계를 움직이는 사람들" 중앙일보사 1996

    11 매일경제산업부, "재계 3 세대 해부" 매일경제신문사 2011

    12 공정거래위원회, "자산 5 조원 이상 상호출자제한기업집단 63 개 지정"

    13 "예스코 (2003~2013), 사업보고서"

    14 "승산 (2005~2012), 감사보고서"

    15 이재현, "소유집중과 지배구조가 기업가치에 주는 영향 : 상호작용을 중심으로" 한국경제의 분석패널 18 (18): 45-96, 2012

    16 이상욱, "소유구조와 기업성과: 대규모 기업집단 소속 기업에 대한 실증연구" 대한경영학회 25 (25): 2209-2232, 2012

    17 "삼양통상 (2005~2013), 사업보고서"

    18 김동운, "두산그룹 지주회사체제와 개인화된 소유지배구조의 강화, 1998~2011년" 한국질서경제학회 15 (15): 01-20, 2012

    19 위평량, "대주주所有와 企業價値 關係에 대한 實證分析(1990년 - 2000년)" 한국경제학회 52 (52): 77-108, 2004

    20 공정거래위원회, "대기업집단의 소유지분구조 공개"

    21 "가온전선 (2003~2013), 사업보고서"

    22 "㈜ LS (2002~2013), 사업보고서"

    23 "㈜ LG (2014), 사업보고서"

    24 "㈜ GS (2004~2013), 사업보고서 ; (2004), 분기보고서"

    25 김동운, "GS그룹의 소유구조, 2005-2013년" 한국경영사학회 29 (29): 209-232, 2014

    26 "GS 건설 (2005~2013), 사업보고서"

    27 "E1 (2003~2013), 사업보고서"

    28 공정거래위원회, "2014 년 대기업집단 주식소유 현황 공개"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.46 0.46 0.43
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.42 0.4 0.668 0.24
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼