요양기관당연지정제의 법정책적 타당성에 대한 소고 -헌재 99헌바76 결정례에 대한 비판적 검토를 중심으로- = Review of Legal and Political Legitimacy of Automatic Appointment -Regime of Medical Service Providers Under National Health Insurance System-

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Under the current national health insurance system, every medical institution is required to be appointed as a medical service provider which should provide medical services to an insured of the national health insurance. In case where an medical institution is involved to national health insurance system by such appointment, the medical institution is obliged to follow the medical service guideline which has been arbitrarily provided by the Ministry of Health and Welfare. Under such circumstances, it is impossible for the medical institution which are subject to the national health insurance system to conduct creative and individualized health care for its patients. If the National Health Insurance Act admits limited number of medical service providers to provide privatized services to their patients out of control of the national health insurance system, it is expected that (i) the national health insurance system could save its budget and concentrate its saved resources on more crucial demands since some portion of relatively rich patient would choose to receive privatized medical services without reimbursement of the national health insurance system, (ii) such patients would be satisfied with more individualized high-quality medical services and (iii) the entire medical industry`s competitiveness would be enhanced. Considering these expected advantages, it is needed for us to reconsider “automatic appointment regime of medical service providers without exception” under national health insurance system.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박형욱, "한국 의료법체계의 성격과 역사적 변천" 연세대학교 대학원 2001

2 변정환, "한국 의료관광 산업의 수요와 공급에 관한 연구" 연세대학교 경제대학원 2009

3 손명세, "통일독일의 보건의료체계 변화" 1999

4 장동민, "전국민의료보험하의 보건의료의 형평성" 한국보건사회학회 (15) : 35-70, 2004

5 한동관, "일본 건강보험법" 동림사 1998

6 김나경, "의료행위의 규범적 통제 방식에 대한 소고(小考) - 독일의 의료보험체계에 비추어 본 임의비급여 통제의 정당성 -" 대한변호사협회 (392) : 73-89, 2009

7 이상돈, "의료법강의" 법문사 2007

8 김병일, "의료계약에 관한 연구" 충남대학교 대학원 2004

9 부종식, "우리나라 건강보험급여체계 상 임의비급여의 문제점과 개선방안에 관한 연구" 고려대학교 법무대학원 2011

10 황덕남, "요양기관당연지정제도에 관한 헌법적 고찰" 연세대학교 보건대학원 2002

11 국민건강보험공단, "외국의 건강보험제도 비교조사" 2000

12 장병원, "약사법 약사행정" 신일북스 2012

13 이재현, "신 약사법 해설(약사법의 이해III)" 데일리팜 2012

14 변무웅, "독일의 법정의료보험 강제가입 면제 제도" 한국법정책학회 12 (12): 1847-1878, 2012

15 최희경, "건강보험수가 결정과정의 정치경제학" 한국보건사회학회 (22) : 67-95, 2007

16 김운묵, "건강보험 진료비청구 및 심사지급에서의 권리분쟁과 구제" 8 (8): 2007

17 하순임, "건강보험 보장성 확보를 위한 정책 과제" 2008

18 Proper, C., "The Demand for Private Medical Insurance in the UK" 111 : 2001

19 Williams B., "Patients and Procedures in Short-stay Independent Hospitals in England and Wales, 1997-1998" 22 : 2000

20 John K. DiMugno, "Navigating Health Care Reform: The Supreme Court's Ruling and the Choppy Waters Ahead" 24 (24): 1-, 2012

21 Michael D. Horowitz, "Medical Tourism: Globalization of the Healthcare Marketplace" 9 (9): 33-,

22 Christopher Ham, "Health Policy in Britain" Palgrave Macmillan 2004

23 OECD, "Disparities in Health Expenditure Across OECD Countries: Hearing Before the Subcomm. on Aging" 2009