RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    개인형 퇴직연금 잠재가입자의 인식 및 니즈 분석 = Analysis on Awareness and Preference of Potential Participants about Individual Retirement of Individual Pension

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60016610

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    After the amendment of the Law of Employee Retirement Income Security Act on 2011, June, the individual retirement account is revised to Individual retirement pension(IRP) and self-employes and employees are allowed to participate in the IRP. Using the survey data on self-employers and employees who are the potential participants, this study empirically investigates their knowledge and preference about various issues of IRP and we propose several policy implications. The empirical results show that although the self-employers and employees recognize the importance of secure stable income through the IRP after retired, they are unknowledable about details regarding IRP. Especially, they little know how to manage their IRP funds. For this reason, they prefer the financial service and advise related with the retirement and basic products such as life-cycle funds with default option. They also strongly prefer to receive their IRP funds as annuity rather than lump-sum on condition that enough tax-benefits are imposed on annuitizing their funds. From the empirical investigation, we propose that it is essential to provide to the self-employers with eduction about IRP and general retirement income system and reform tax-system to induce the self-employers and employees to annuitize their IRP funds. It is also necessary to unify two different retirement pension schemes, simple funds such as life-cyle funds with default options for participants who are unknowledable about managing their IRP funds.
    번역하기

    After the amendment of the Law of Employee Retirement Income Security Act on 2011, June, the individual retirement account is revised to Individual retirement pension(IRP) and self-employes and employees are allowed to participate in the IRP. Using th...

    After the amendment of the Law of Employee Retirement Income Security Act on 2011, June, the individual retirement account is revised to Individual retirement pension(IRP) and self-employes and employees are allowed to participate in the IRP. Using the survey data on self-employers and employees who are the potential participants, this study empirically investigates their knowledge and preference about various issues of IRP and we propose several policy implications. The empirical results show that although the self-employers and employees recognize the importance of secure stable income through the IRP after retired, they are unknowledable about details regarding IRP. Especially, they little know how to manage their IRP funds. For this reason, they prefer the financial service and advise related with the retirement and basic products such as life-cycle funds with default option. They also strongly prefer to receive their IRP funds as annuity rather than lump-sum on condition that enough tax-benefits are imposed on annuitizing their funds. From the empirical investigation, we propose that it is essential to provide to the self-employers with eduction about IRP and general retirement income system and reform tax-system to induce the self-employers and employees to annuitize their IRP funds. It is also necessary to unify two different retirement pension schemes, simple funds such as life-cyle funds with default options for participants who are unknowledable about managing their IRP funds.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 고광수, "영세 사업장에 대한 퇴직급여 제도의 효율적 적용 방안" 11 (11): 23-41, 2006

    2 류건식, "보험회사의 개인형 퇴직연금 운영방안" 2011

    3 류건식, "노후소득 보장 기능 강화를 위한 개인형 퇴직연금제도 개선방안" 보험연구원 33 : 1-11, 2009

    4 이태호, "개인형퇴직연금 도입효과 및 활성화 방안" 한국채권연구원 2009

    5 杉田浩治, "自動加入方式を採擇する英國の新個人年金制度" 證券經濟硏究所 2010

    6 野村亜紀子, "個人型確定醵出年金の課題" 野村資本市場硏究所 2006

    7 日本國民年金基金聯合會, "個人型確定拠出年金実態アンケート調査査"

    8 ICI, "The Role of IRAs in U.S. Households' Savings for Retirement" ICI Press 2009

    9 Rozinka, E, "Survey of Investment Choice by Pension Fund Members" 40-68, 2007

    10 Benartzi, S, "Naive Diversification Strategies in Defined Contribution Savings Plans" 91 (91): 79-98, 2001

    1 고광수, "영세 사업장에 대한 퇴직급여 제도의 효율적 적용 방안" 11 (11): 23-41, 2006

    2 류건식, "보험회사의 개인형 퇴직연금 운영방안" 2011

    3 류건식, "노후소득 보장 기능 강화를 위한 개인형 퇴직연금제도 개선방안" 보험연구원 33 : 1-11, 2009

    4 이태호, "개인형퇴직연금 도입효과 및 활성화 방안" 한국채권연구원 2009

    5 杉田浩治, "自動加入方式を採擇する英國の新個人年金制度" 證券經濟硏究所 2010

    6 野村亜紀子, "個人型確定醵出年金の課題" 野村資本市場硏究所 2006

    7 日本國民年金基金聯合會, "個人型確定拠出年金実態アンケート調査査"

    8 ICI, "The Role of IRAs in U.S. Households' Savings for Retirement" ICI Press 2009

    9 Rozinka, E, "Survey of Investment Choice by Pension Fund Members" 40-68, 2007

    10 Benartzi, S, "Naive Diversification Strategies in Defined Contribution Savings Plans" 91 (91): 79-98, 2001

    11 Cameron, A. C, "Microeconetrics: Method and Applications" Cambridge University Press 2005

    12 Choi, J, "Defined Contribution Pensions: Plan Rules, Participant Decisions, and the Path of Least Resistance, In Tax Policy and the Economy" MIT Press 2002

    13 박지순, "4인 이하 중소사업장 등에 대한 다수 사용자 퇴직연금 플랜 적용방안" 고려대학교 2009

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.05 1.05 1.02
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.1 1.15 1.323 0.1
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼