RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      The Influence of Type of Menu Labeling on Consumers’ Fast Food Selection and Evaluation

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T14566738

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Menu labeling has been proposed as a policy tool to promote the selection of healthy items. Nonetheless, previous research has reported mixed findings of their effectiveness. Therefore, the objective of this study was to identify which type of nutritional information and format of menu labeling has more influence on college students’ fast food selection, evaluation, and feeling of conflict. Moreover, this study aimed to evaluate how consumers’ self-control and health consciousness moderate the relationship between different types of menu labeling and consumers’ food behavior. Participants selected a menu item from different types of menu. In study 1, they were randomly assigned to one of the four menus: 1) no calorie information, 2) calorie information, 3) calorie + fat information, and 4) calorie + exercise information. In study 2, they were randomly assigned to one of the four menus: 1) fat information, 2) exercise information, 3) traffic light symbols, and 4) exercise icons. Results showed that in study 1, participants selected fewer calories in the menus with calorie and calorie + fat information. In study 2, participants selected fewer calories and had higher feeling of conflict in the menu with visual format (traffic light symbols). Moreover, self-control and health consciousness moderated significantly the relationship between the type of menu labeling and consumers’ food selection. In conclusion, the provision of nutritional information on fast food menus influenced consumers’ fast food selection, feeling of conflict, and product evaluation.
      번역하기

      Menu labeling has been proposed as a policy tool to promote the selection of healthy items. Nonetheless, previous research has reported mixed findings of their effectiveness. Therefore, the objective of this study was to identify which type of nutriti...

      Menu labeling has been proposed as a policy tool to promote the selection of healthy items. Nonetheless, previous research has reported mixed findings of their effectiveness. Therefore, the objective of this study was to identify which type of nutritional information and format of menu labeling has more influence on college students’ fast food selection, evaluation, and feeling of conflict. Moreover, this study aimed to evaluate how consumers’ self-control and health consciousness moderate the relationship between different types of menu labeling and consumers’ food behavior. Participants selected a menu item from different types of menu. In study 1, they were randomly assigned to one of the four menus: 1) no calorie information, 2) calorie information, 3) calorie + fat information, and 4) calorie + exercise information. In study 2, they were randomly assigned to one of the four menus: 1) fat information, 2) exercise information, 3) traffic light symbols, and 4) exercise icons. Results showed that in study 1, participants selected fewer calories in the menus with calorie and calorie + fat information. In study 2, participants selected fewer calories and had higher feeling of conflict in the menu with visual format (traffic light symbols). Moreover, self-control and health consciousness moderated significantly the relationship between the type of menu labeling and consumers’ food selection. In conclusion, the provision of nutritional information on fast food menus influenced consumers’ fast food selection, feeling of conflict, and product evaluation.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. Introduction 1
      • 1.1 Background of the Study 1
      • 1.2 Statement of the Problem 3
      • 1.3 Purpose of the Study 5
      • 1.4 Significance of the Study 6
      • 1. Introduction 1
      • 1.1 Background of the Study 1
      • 1.2 Statement of the Problem 3
      • 1.3 Purpose of the Study 5
      • 1.4 Significance of the Study 6
      • 2. Literature Review 8
      • 2.1. Decision-making Process 8
      • 2.2. Fast Food Consumption in College Students 13
      • 2.3. Menu Labeling 15
      • 2.3.1. The Effect of Menu Labeling on Consumers Food Choices 15
      • 2.3.2. Types of Nutritional Information and Formats of Menu Labeling 16
      • 2.3.3. The Influence of Menu Labeling with Traffic Light Symbols on Consumers Food Choices 17
      • 2.3.4. The Effect of Menu Labeling with Exercise Information on Consumers Food Choices 19
      • 2.3.5. The Impact of Providing Nutritional Information on Restaurant Menus on Consumers Product Evaluation 20
      • 2.3.6. The Influence of Calorie Information Disclosure on Consumers Feeling of Conflict 22
      • 2.3.7. The Impact of Consumers Characteristics on Information Processing 24
      • 2.3.8. The Effect of Calorie Information Disclosure on Consumers Self-control 24
      • 2.3.9. The Relationship between Health Consciousness and Consumers Food Choices 26
      • 3. Research Model & Hypotheses Development 28
      • 3.1. Research Questions 28
      • 3.2. Conceptual Framework of the Study 28
      • 3.3. Hypotheses Development 29
      • 3.4. Research Model of the Study 30
      • 4. Methodology 32
      • 4.1. Experimental Design 32
      • 4.2. Sample Selection and Data Collection 33
      • 4.3. Procedure 34
      • 4.4. Measurement of Variables 34
      • 4.5. Statistical Analysis 37
      • 5. Results 38
      • 5.1. Sample 38
      • 5.2. Characteristics of Study Participants 38
      • 5.3. Reliability Analysis 41
      • 5.4. Study 1 41
      • 5.5. Study 2 67
      • 5.6. Further Analysis 77
      • 5.7 Summary of Hypotheses 78
      • 6. Discussion 79
      • 6.1 Major Findings and Discussion 79
      • 6.2 Conclusions 83
      • 6.3 Implications of the Study 85
      • 6.4 Limitations and Future Research 87
      • References 88
      • Appendices 105
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼