세무사 보수 표준화의 필요성과 그 방안에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Need for and Options for Standardizing Tax Accountants Compensation

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Bookkeeping, Preparation of tax adjustment statement, and Certification of sincere filing of income tax are the most basic and core tasks of tax accountants, and if these tasks are not handled accurately, accurate income calculation is impossible, so there is a great risk that sincere tax filing and payment will not be made and tax evasion or tax avoidance will occur. Nevertheless, if excessive dumping of tax accountant fees is widespread, taxpayers are likely to seek out tax accountant firms with lower prices, and it will be difficult for tax accountant firms to handle cases diligently with sufficient time and effort.
The result. Not only does it undermine sound taxpaying behavior and undermine the culture of good tax compliance, but it also results in lost tax revenue. It also puts the taxpayers themselves at risk of being accused of tax evasion, not to mention the collection of the missing taxes, including surcharges, in the future. As a result, it is necessary for the government or a tax accountant organization to establish taxpayer morality by inducing sincere filing and payment by providing reasonable remuneration standards for tax accounting services such as bookkeeping, tax filing, and verification of sincere filing, which are the most important and repetitive tasks but involve many taxpayers.
Among the areas of tax accountants’ work that are suitable for standardization of remuneration are bookkeeping, preparation of tax adjustment statement, and certification of sincere filing of income tax. The remaining tasks are not suitable for standardization because they are difficult to meet the above criteria.
Specific legislative methods for standardizing remuneration include the taxing authority setting the remuneration standard, the Minister of Strategy and Finance setting the remuneration standard in consultation with the KACPTA(Korean Association of Certified Public Tax Accountants), and the KACPTA setting the remuneration standard without government intervention and allowing tax accountants to follow it, but we believe that the Minister of Strategy and Finance setting the remuneration standard in consultation with the KACPTA is the most appropriate.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 허 영, "한국헌법론" 박영사 2023

2 구재이, "한국세무사회장 2024 새해 인사말씀"

3 한국세무사회, "한국세무사회 위상 강화를 위한 여론조사 및 홍보전략 수립을 위한 용역 ― 여론조사(2종) 실시 일반국민 여론조사/회원 여론조사" 2024

4 조연주 ; 김민희 ; 전규안, "표준감사시간제도 도입이 감사품질에 미치는 영향" 한국회계학회 47 (47): 2022

5 안희원, "카르텔일괄정리법의 주요내용과 기대효과" 한국공정경쟁연합회 (42) : 1999

6 금융감독원, "최근 3년간 외부감사 투입시간 등 현황 분석"

7 구재이, "제33대 한국세무사회 ‘3대 혁신 30대 약속’"

8 김경용, "외부감사법상 표준감사시간제의 적용이 감사품질에 미치는 영향" 2020

9 일간 NTN 국세신문, "기장료 20년 제자리…‘세무사업 끝났다’?"

10 김두형, "관세사 보수체계의 합리적 제도화 방안" 한국관세학회 18 (18): 2017

11 정임표, "관세사 보수요율 법제화가 절실한 이유"

12 정재열, "관세사 보수 현실화돼야 서비스 질 높아져"

13 이봉의, "공정거래법" 박영사 2022

14 정호열, "경제법" 박영사 2019

15 신현윤, "경제법" 법문사 2020

16 법제처 국가법령정보센터, "감정평가법인 등의 보수에 관한 기준 , [별표] 감정평가수수료 체계"

17 이민우 ; 정기위, "감사환경에 따른 표준감사시간제도의 도입과 감사품질 개선 효과 : 감사시장의 경쟁강도와 비감사보수를 중심으로" 한국회계학회 29 (29): 2020