RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    미술 교과서 작품 정보 표기에 관한 연구

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109956290

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study analyzes artwork labeling practices in art textbooks developed under the 2022 revised art curriculum and explores appropriate standards through comparison with domestic and international museum cases. Findings indicate inconsistencies in labeling artist names, titles, media, dimensions, and production years across textbooks. For two-dimensional works, variations such as “medium on support” versus “support and medium,” and “height × width” versus “width × height” were observed. Emerging visual materials—including digital images, video works, and AI-generated images—also lacked standardized guidelines, limiting learners’ understanding. Some textbooks presented altered or distorted reproductions, potentially hindering appreciation. In contrast, museums provide detailed information on materials, techniques, environments, and formats that support deeper engagement. The study emphasizes that artwork labeling in textbooks should function as a core pedagogical element, underscoring the need for standardized criteria to ensure consistency and educational effectiveness.
    번역하기

    This study analyzes artwork labeling practices in art textbooks developed under the 2022 revised art curriculum and explores appropriate standards through comparison with domestic and international museum cases. Findings indicate inconsistencies in la...

    This study analyzes artwork labeling practices in art textbooks developed under the 2022 revised art curriculum and explores appropriate standards through comparison with domestic and international museum cases. Findings indicate inconsistencies in labeling artist names, titles, media, dimensions, and production years across textbooks. For two-dimensional works, variations such as “medium on support” versus “support and medium,” and “height × width” versus “width × height” were observed. Emerging visual materials—including digital images, video works, and AI-generated images—also lacked standardized guidelines, limiting learners’ understanding. Some textbooks presented altered or distorted reproductions, potentially hindering appreciation. In contrast, museums provide detailed information on materials, techniques, environments, and formats that support deeper engagement. The study emphasizes that artwork labeling in textbooks should function as a core pedagogical element, underscoring the need for standardized criteria to ensure consistency and educational effectiveness.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼