RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      외식기업 촉진 메시지 전략에 관한 연구: 기대-불일치모형과 동화-대조이론을 중심으로 = A Study on Promotional Message Strategy in Food service company: Based on Expectancy-disconfirmation model and Assimilation-contrast theory

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101075137

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study is to present a quantitative standard with regards to the borderline between latitudes of acceptance and latitudes of rejection where assimilation-contrast effects appear, so that reasonable criteria for range of acceptance of customers whose behavioral decisions are influenced by exaggerated promotional messages from foodservice companies. Also, this study aims to explain the reason that assimilation, contrast, and assimilation-contrast effects appear by classifying groups based on quantitative criteria and identifying the difference between groups in terms of causal relationship among expectancy, outcome, disconfirmation, and satisfaction. In addition, this study aims to establish practically applicable and efficient promotional messages by identifying psychological mechanisms of customers that affect their satisfaction. Summary of analysis is as follows. In this study, manipulated expectancy level of 20~40% is identified as assimilation zone. In contrast, manipulated expectancy level of 60~100% is identified as contrast zone. Also, path analysis per each group after re-classifying each condition into group with low level of exaggeration and group with high level of exaggeration based on the results of difference verification showed significant positive correlation between expectancy and outcome and significant positive correlation between expectancy and satisfaction in Low group. In contrast, in High group, there was significant negative correlation between expectancy and outcome and there was no significant correlation between expectancy and satisfaction. Analysis suggests following points. First, theoretically, this research is meaningful in that it presents the zone of assimilation-contrast in a quantitative way through experimental design for the first time. Practically, this study is meaningful in that it presents the criteria for the level of exaggeration in promotional messages during promotions through picture or model of food. However, this study holds a limitation for generalization to other fields of food services because it is based on a single menu.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to present a quantitative standard with regards to the borderline between latitudes of acceptance and latitudes of rejection where assimilation-contrast effects appear, so that reasonable criteria for range of acceptance o...

      The purpose of this study is to present a quantitative standard with regards to the borderline between latitudes of acceptance and latitudes of rejection where assimilation-contrast effects appear, so that reasonable criteria for range of acceptance of customers whose behavioral decisions are influenced by exaggerated promotional messages from foodservice companies. Also, this study aims to explain the reason that assimilation, contrast, and assimilation-contrast effects appear by classifying groups based on quantitative criteria and identifying the difference between groups in terms of causal relationship among expectancy, outcome, disconfirmation, and satisfaction. In addition, this study aims to establish practically applicable and efficient promotional messages by identifying psychological mechanisms of customers that affect their satisfaction. Summary of analysis is as follows. In this study, manipulated expectancy level of 20~40% is identified as assimilation zone. In contrast, manipulated expectancy level of 60~100% is identified as contrast zone. Also, path analysis per each group after re-classifying each condition into group with low level of exaggeration and group with high level of exaggeration based on the results of difference verification showed significant positive correlation between expectancy and outcome and significant positive correlation between expectancy and satisfaction in Low group. In contrast, in High group, there was significant negative correlation between expectancy and outcome and there was no significant correlation between expectancy and satisfaction. Analysis suggests following points. First, theoretically, this research is meaningful in that it presents the zone of assimilation-contrast in a quantitative way through experimental design for the first time. Practically, this study is meaningful in that it presents the criteria for the level of exaggeration in promotional messages during promotions through picture or model of food. However, this study holds a limitation for generalization to other fields of food services because it is based on a single menu.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼