RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      인공지능과 인문정신: 디지털 시대의 인문학의 대중화 = Artificial Intelligence and Human Intelligence: Humanities Popularization in the Digital Age

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107326858

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Martin Heidegger, in his widely-known essay, “The Question Concerning the Technology,” asks prophetic questions anticipating the era of artificial intelligence and posthumanism, defines technology in terms of an “instrumentum” of Latin etymology which combines the double meanings of “a means to an end” and “human activity,” and articulates the “instrumentality” in the context of the Aristotelian causality of the four causes. The instrumentality refers to the use of the tool by setting it up. Heidegger argues that the instrumentality is the condition that brings about the right relationship between humans and technology, the relationship in which technology depends on how humans properly control the means. Thus, technology is inevitably instrumental and anthropological. The importance of the ethical value of this paper lies in the way humans dominate technology psycho-somatically. As the technology threatens to get out of human control, the human will to dominate the technology becomes urgent. In this context, this paper traces the development of AI in relation to the robotics in a genealogical way, in particular, the developmental process in which humanities, cognitive science, brain science, and robotics are rapidly and broadly integrated based on artificial intelligence and big data. Then, this paper showcases the analysis of how humanities thinking methods, especially literary imagination and philosophical thinking methods relate to the popularization of humanities in the digital age in the context of written language and humanities through the coding process. The main objective of this paper is to examine the significance and the relevance of artificial intelligence and human intelligence to the human community at large that embodies the collective humanities spirit.
      번역하기

      Martin Heidegger, in his widely-known essay, “The Question Concerning the Technology,” asks prophetic questions anticipating the era of artificial intelligence and posthumanism, defines technology in terms of an “instrumentum” of Latin etymolo...

      Martin Heidegger, in his widely-known essay, “The Question Concerning the Technology,” asks prophetic questions anticipating the era of artificial intelligence and posthumanism, defines technology in terms of an “instrumentum” of Latin etymology which combines the double meanings of “a means to an end” and “human activity,” and articulates the “instrumentality” in the context of the Aristotelian causality of the four causes. The instrumentality refers to the use of the tool by setting it up. Heidegger argues that the instrumentality is the condition that brings about the right relationship between humans and technology, the relationship in which technology depends on how humans properly control the means. Thus, technology is inevitably instrumental and anthropological. The importance of the ethical value of this paper lies in the way humans dominate technology psycho-somatically. As the technology threatens to get out of human control, the human will to dominate the technology becomes urgent. In this context, this paper traces the development of AI in relation to the robotics in a genealogical way, in particular, the developmental process in which humanities, cognitive science, brain science, and robotics are rapidly and broadly integrated based on artificial intelligence and big data. Then, this paper showcases the analysis of how humanities thinking methods, especially literary imagination and philosophical thinking methods relate to the popularization of humanities in the digital age in the context of written language and humanities through the coding process. The main objective of this paper is to examine the significance and the relevance of artificial intelligence and human intelligence to the human community at large that embodies the collective humanities spirit.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김영민, "인문학대중화사업 운영개선 및 발전방향 수립에 관한 연구" 한국연구재단 2015

      2 Dreyfus, Hubert L., "Why Heideggerian AI Failed and How Fixing It Would Require Making It More Heideggerian" 20 (20): 247-268, 2007

      3 Kim, Youngmin, "Sublime and Technology: Nietzsche/Kant/Heidegger" 12 (12): 1-19, 2020

      4 김영민, "Sublime and Technology: Nietzsche / Kant / Heidegger" 한국영어영문학회 66 (66): 3-22, 2020

      5 김영민, "Structured Data in Digital Humanities and World Literature: From Close Reading to Distant Viewing" 한국동서비교문학학회 (46) : 427-457, 2018

      6 Freeman, Walter, "Societies of Brains: A Study in the Neuroscience of Love and Hate" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1995

      7 Wolf, Maryanne, "Proust and the Squid: The Story and Science of the Reading Brain" HarperCollins Publisheres 2007

      8 Changeux, Jean-Pierre, "Neuronal Man: The Biology of Mind" Princeton University Press 1997

      9 Stiegler, Bernard, "Nanjing Lectures 2016-2019" 2020

      10 Haugeland, John, "Having Thought: Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind" Harvard UP 207-237, 1998

      1 김영민, "인문학대중화사업 운영개선 및 발전방향 수립에 관한 연구" 한국연구재단 2015

      2 Dreyfus, Hubert L., "Why Heideggerian AI Failed and How Fixing It Would Require Making It More Heideggerian" 20 (20): 247-268, 2007

      3 Kim, Youngmin, "Sublime and Technology: Nietzsche/Kant/Heidegger" 12 (12): 1-19, 2020

      4 김영민, "Sublime and Technology: Nietzsche / Kant / Heidegger" 한국영어영문학회 66 (66): 3-22, 2020

      5 김영민, "Structured Data in Digital Humanities and World Literature: From Close Reading to Distant Viewing" 한국동서비교문학학회 (46) : 427-457, 2018

      6 Freeman, Walter, "Societies of Brains: A Study in the Neuroscience of Love and Hate" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1995

      7 Wolf, Maryanne, "Proust and the Squid: The Story and Science of the Reading Brain" HarperCollins Publisheres 2007

      8 Changeux, Jean-Pierre, "Neuronal Man: The Biology of Mind" Princeton University Press 1997

      9 Stiegler, Bernard, "Nanjing Lectures 2016-2019" 2020

      10 Haugeland, John, "Having Thought: Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind" Harvard UP 207-237, 1998

      11 Buchanan, Allen, "Better than Human: The Promise and Perils of Enhancing Ourselves" Oxford University Press 2011

      12 Heidegger, Martin, "Basic Writings" Harper & Row 1993

      13 Haugeland, John, "Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea" MIT Press 1985

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.56 0.56 0.55
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.5 0.45 1.007 0.18
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼