RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    윤리 이데올로기가 윤리적인 의사결정에 미치는 영향 = 한국과 미국의 PR 담당자 비교 분석

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76210134

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this paper is to compare perceptions toward ethical issues between Korean and American public relations practitioners in the context of ethical ideology. Ethical perceptions include individual ethical perceptions and perceptions toward organizational codes involving ethical decision-making. This study specifically relates individual ethical ideology to public relations ethical codes. The surveys were conducted with the Korean and American public relations practitioners. The results showed that the Korean public relations practitioners have less strict ethical perceptions than the American public relations practitioners. Those results also explained high ethical relativism and low social responsibility toward general publics and the profession itself among the Korean public relations practitioners. The mutivariate analysis of variance results showed that the Korean public relations practitioners could enhance the individual ethical standard by reconceptualizing ethical idealism. This study also indicated that the individual's ethical ideology could be an important variable in explaining the outcomes of the individual's ethical decision-making. Study implications discussed practical advices for increasing the Korean practitioners' ethical standards.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this paper is to compare perceptions toward ethical issues between Korean and American public relations practitioners in the context of ethical ideology. Ethical perceptions include individual ethical perceptions and perceptions toward ...

    The purpose of this paper is to compare perceptions toward ethical issues between Korean and American public relations practitioners in the context of ethical ideology. Ethical perceptions include individual ethical perceptions and perceptions toward organizational codes involving ethical decision-making. This study specifically relates individual ethical ideology to public relations ethical codes. The surveys were conducted with the Korean and American public relations practitioners. The results showed that the Korean public relations practitioners have less strict ethical perceptions than the American public relations practitioners. Those results also explained high ethical relativism and low social responsibility toward general publics and the profession itself among the Korean public relations practitioners. The mutivariate analysis of variance results showed that the Korean public relations practitioners could enhance the individual ethical standard by reconceptualizing ethical idealism. This study also indicated that the individual's ethical ideology could be an important variable in explaining the outcomes of the individual's ethical decision-making. Study implications discussed practical advices for increasing the Korean practitioners' ethical standards.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.75 1.75 1.94
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.07 2.11 2.773 0.4
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼