RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    국제사회이론 관점에서 본 남북관계의 역사와 발전 전망

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60300783

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Of the arguments of theory of international society, mutual recognition, shared identity, institution and cooperation have meaningful implications for North-South Korean relations. They could be significant concepts that North and South Koreas should pursue in that they have functioned in the course of establishing international society in European and ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) regions.
    In terms of mutual recognition, the history of North-South Korean relations rather showed mutual exclusion until the early 1970s, thereafter gradually deepened mutual recognition. However, the Lee Myung-bak government has exploited the issue of mutual recognition as a strategy toward Pyongyang by referring to possible sudden changes and human rights in North Korea. As for shared identity, the two Koreas, in general, are on the way of restoring common culture, language and customs, but still remain at the low level of recovering homogeneity as seen in the failure of reuniting separated families on a regular basis.
    Institutionalization of North-South relations has been carried out by making agreements between the two Koreas, but putting institution into implement is still far from perfect. North-South cooperation had been expanded until the inauguration of the current Lee government. However, economic cooperation thereafter has been halted due to the North’s distrust of the Seoul government and the South’s concern about Pyongyang’s relative gains expected from North-South cooperation. It is imperative that North-South relations proceed to international society. It can be possible to materialize it when the two Koreas continue to cooperate on the basis of mutual recognition, intensify the institutionalization of North-South relations and deepen shared identity.
    번역하기

    Of the arguments of theory of international society, mutual recognition, shared identity, institution and cooperation have meaningful implications for North-South Korean relations. They could be significant concepts that North and South Koreas should ...

    Of the arguments of theory of international society, mutual recognition, shared identity, institution and cooperation have meaningful implications for North-South Korean relations. They could be significant concepts that North and South Koreas should pursue in that they have functioned in the course of establishing international society in European and ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) regions.
    In terms of mutual recognition, the history of North-South Korean relations rather showed mutual exclusion until the early 1970s, thereafter gradually deepened mutual recognition. However, the Lee Myung-bak government has exploited the issue of mutual recognition as a strategy toward Pyongyang by referring to possible sudden changes and human rights in North Korea. As for shared identity, the two Koreas, in general, are on the way of restoring common culture, language and customs, but still remain at the low level of recovering homogeneity as seen in the failure of reuniting separated families on a regular basis.
    Institutionalization of North-South relations has been carried out by making agreements between the two Koreas, but putting institution into implement is still far from perfect. North-South cooperation had been expanded until the inauguration of the current Lee government. However, economic cooperation thereafter has been halted due to the North’s distrust of the Seoul government and the South’s concern about Pyongyang’s relative gains expected from North-South cooperation. It is imperative that North-South relations proceed to international society. It can be possible to materialize it when the two Koreas continue to cooperate on the basis of mutual recognition, intensify the institutionalization of North-South relations and deepen shared identity.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 전재성, "협상이론의 관점에서 본 남· 북 ·미 3국간관계: 이익, 권력, 정체성, 다면게임의 요소 분석" 국제학연구소 11 (11): 1-22, 2002

    2 한운석, "하나의 민족, 두 개의 과거: 20세기 독일민족과 통일문제" 신서원 2003

    3 통일부, "통일백서" 통일부 2002

    4 이수훈, "탈냉전기 국제 환경과 남북한 관계, In 남북한관계론" 한울아카데미 2005

    5 이수훈, "탈냉전ㆍ세계화ㆍ지역화에 따른 동북아 질서 형성과 남북관계" 극동문제연구소 25 (25): 1-31, 2009

    6 정진영, "자유주의 국제정치이론과 남북한관계: 협력과 평화의 제도화를 향한 긴 여정" 13 : 2003

    7 구갑우, "자유주의 국제정치경제 이론과 남북한 관계" 3 : 2001

    8 마상윤, "영국학파의 국제사회론" 29 (29): 2008

    9 전재성, "영국의 국제사회학파 이론, In 현대국제관계이론과 한국" 사회평론 2004

    10 황병덕, "신동방정책과 대북포용정책" 두리 2000

    1 전재성, "협상이론의 관점에서 본 남· 북 ·미 3국간관계: 이익, 권력, 정체성, 다면게임의 요소 분석" 국제학연구소 11 (11): 1-22, 2002

    2 한운석, "하나의 민족, 두 개의 과거: 20세기 독일민족과 통일문제" 신서원 2003

    3 통일부, "통일백서" 통일부 2002

    4 이수훈, "탈냉전기 국제 환경과 남북한 관계, In 남북한관계론" 한울아카데미 2005

    5 이수훈, "탈냉전ㆍ세계화ㆍ지역화에 따른 동북아 질서 형성과 남북관계" 극동문제연구소 25 (25): 1-31, 2009

    6 정진영, "자유주의 국제정치이론과 남북한관계: 협력과 평화의 제도화를 향한 긴 여정" 13 : 2003

    7 구갑우, "자유주의 국제정치경제 이론과 남북한 관계" 3 : 2001

    8 마상윤, "영국학파의 국제사회론" 29 (29): 2008

    9 전재성, "영국의 국제사회학파 이론, In 현대국제관계이론과 한국" 사회평론 2004

    10 황병덕, "신동방정책과 대북포용정책" 두리 2000

    11 이종석, "분단시대의 통일학" 한울아카데미 1998

    12 김성진, "마틴 와이트(Martin Wight)의 국제사회론 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 2001

    13 신욱희, "동아시아 국제이론의 모색: 국제사회론과 변형된 주권 논의를 중심으로" 29 (29): 2002

    14 김용호, "대북정책과 국제관계이론: 4자회담과 햇볕정책을 중심으로한 비판적 고찰" 한국정치학회 36 (36): 135-154, 2002

    15 함택영, "남북한 군비경쟁과 군축 전망, In 남북한관계론" 한울아카데미 2005

    16 구갑우, "남북한 관계의 이론들: 분류와 비판, In 남북관계론" 한울아카데미 2005

    17 고병철, "남북한 관계의 역사적 맥락, In 남북한관계론" 한울아카데미 2005

    18 양문수, "남북한 경제관계의 오늘과 내일, In 남북한관계론" 한울아카데미 2005

    19 김형기, "남북관계 변천사" 연세대학교 출판부 2010

    20 이 근, "구성주의 시각에서 본 남북정상회담: 양면게임을 통한 정체성 변화 모색" 7 (7): 2001

    21 전재성, "구성주의 국제정치이론과 남북관계" 24 : 2002

    22 朴世勳, "國際社會에 관한 一연구 : Hedley N.Bull의 國際社會論을 중심으로" 서울大學校 大學院 1992

    23 Wight, Martin, "Western Values in International Relations, In Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics" George Allen & Unwin 1966

    24 Bull, Hedley, "The State’s Positive Role in World Affairs" 108 (108): 1979

    25 Jackson, Robert H, "The Political Theory of International Society, In International Relations Theory Today" Polity Press 1995

    26 Watson, Adam., "The Evolution of International Society" Routledge 1992

    27 Lee, Goo, "The Evolution of Inter-Korean Relations in the Post-Cold War Period and International Relations Theories" 26 (26): 2002

    28 Buzan, Barry, "The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR" 27 (27): 2001

    29 Narine, Shaun, "The English School and ASEAN" 19 (19): 2006

    30 Vigezzi, Brunello, "The British Committee on the Theory of International Politics: The Rediscovery of History" Edizioni Unicopli 2005

    31 Bull, Hedley, "The Anarchical Society: A Society of Order in World Politics" Columbia University Press 1977

    32 Wight, Martin, "Systems of States" Leicester University Press 1977

    33 Bull, Hedley, "Society and Anarchy in International Relations, In Diplomatic Investigations" Oxford University Press 1966

    34 Wight, Martin, "Review of International Studies" 13 (13): 1987

    35 Linklater, Andrew., "Men and Citizens in the Theory of International Relations" Macmillan 1982

    36 Bull, Hedley, "Introductory Essay, In Martin Wight. Systems of States" Leicester University Press 1977

    37 Chafets, Glenn, "Introduction: Tracing the Influence of Identity on Foreign Policy" 8 (8): 1999

    38 Wight, Martin, "International Theory: The Three Traditions" Holmes & Meier 1992

    39 황지환, "International Relations Theory and the North Korean Nuclear Crisis: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice" 일민국제관계연구원 13 (13): 115-148, 2008

    40 Krasner, Stephen D., "International Regimes" Cornell University Press 1983

    41 Watson, Adam, "Hedley Bull, State Systems, and International Studies" 13 : 1987

    42 Buzan, Barry, "From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation" Cambridge University Press, 2004

    43 Buzan, Barry, "From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School" 47 (47): 1993

    44 Watson, Adam., "European International Society and its Expansion, In The Expansion of International Society" Oxford University Press 1984

    45 Bull, Hedley, "Conclusion, In The Expansion of International Society" Oxford University Press 1984

    46 Suganami, Hidemi, "Alexander Wendt and the English School"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2018-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2013-03-22 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Korean Journal of International Studies -> Korean Journal of International Relations KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2010-12-01 등재 학술지 분리 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2010-06-22 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Korean Journal of International Relations -> The Korean Journal of International Studies KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.91 0.91 1.12
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.07 1.09 1.415 0.17
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼