RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      정성적 평가의 평가준거와 전공역량간의 관계 연구 = Relationship Between Major Competency and Evaluation Criteria on Qualitative Evaluation

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In order to subjectively analyze the admission officer`s standards that vary according to the relevant majors, this research looks at two aspects. First subject is the difference between what the admission officer perceives as necessary qualities of a successful candidate against what the actual candidate believes. The second part studies whether the current student`s required competency varies according to the majors. The result of the research revealed the different ideas between the admission officers and the accepted candidates regarding the necessary qualities of a successful candidate. Also, candidates who were accepted under the Admission Officer System were better aware of the required qualities than candidates accepted under different programs. This research also showed that the current student`s understanding of required competencies varies according to their majors. Of the 11 competencies which were the subject of this analysis, “Substantial reading activities and literary knowledge” and “Leadership” stood out as core competencies for the Department of Korean Language and Literature and the Department of Political Science and Diplomacy, relatively. The core competencies of the 10 majors were based on what the current students recognized as required competencies. Finally, the implications, limits and further directions of this research are suggested.
      번역하기

      In order to subjectively analyze the admission officer`s standards that vary according to the relevant majors, this research looks at two aspects. First subject is the difference between what the admission officer perceives as necessary qualities of a...

      In order to subjectively analyze the admission officer`s standards that vary according to the relevant majors, this research looks at two aspects. First subject is the difference between what the admission officer perceives as necessary qualities of a successful candidate against what the actual candidate believes. The second part studies whether the current student`s required competency varies according to the majors. The result of the research revealed the different ideas between the admission officers and the accepted candidates regarding the necessary qualities of a successful candidate. Also, candidates who were accepted under the Admission Officer System were better aware of the required qualities than candidates accepted under different programs. This research also showed that the current student`s understanding of required competencies varies according to their majors. Of the 11 competencies which were the subject of this analysis, “Substantial reading activities and literary knowledge” and “Leadership” stood out as core competencies for the Department of Korean Language and Literature and the Department of Political Science and Diplomacy, relatively. The core competencies of the 10 majors were based on what the current students recognized as required competencies. Finally, the implications, limits and further directions of this research are suggested.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼