RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      도시휴양림의 포지셔닝 검토를 통한 적정시설기준 탐색 = A Study on the Facility Regulations of Urban Recreation Forest by the Positioning Concept

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101267318

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study is focused on finding out the character of urban recreation forest and investigating facilities regulations of forest resources around urban areas to meet future recreation needs. The method of this study is to compare urban recreation forests with similar facilities like urban parks and natural recreation forests. By this way, this study not only identifies the characteristics of urban recreation forest as emerging recreational facility, but also outputs regulations that can be adapted to real environment. Urban recreation forest is defined as follows: It has forest with good natural landscape and easy access. It makes emotion rich and its function is focused on outdoor recreation nature education, and experiences for family group mainly within a day or on weekends. This study suggests that the minimal area of urban recreation forest should be over 100,000$m^2$, with a facility ratio less than 20%. Building coverage should be less than 7% when the urban recreation forest is under 300,000$m^2$, less than 5% when 300,000∼500,000$m^2$, and less than 3% when over 500,000$m^2$ The limits of building height is 3 stories, or under 12m. This study finds out the character, the needs of urban recreation and the criterion for project feasibility. significance of the result is supplying theoretical basement on related regulation. Based on the results, further study will establish landscape management method and legislation & application in a detailed examination.
      번역하기

      This study is focused on finding out the character of urban recreation forest and investigating facilities regulations of forest resources around urban areas to meet future recreation needs. The method of this study is to compare urban recreation fore...

      This study is focused on finding out the character of urban recreation forest and investigating facilities regulations of forest resources around urban areas to meet future recreation needs. The method of this study is to compare urban recreation forests with similar facilities like urban parks and natural recreation forests. By this way, this study not only identifies the characteristics of urban recreation forest as emerging recreational facility, but also outputs regulations that can be adapted to real environment. Urban recreation forest is defined as follows: It has forest with good natural landscape and easy access. It makes emotion rich and its function is focused on outdoor recreation nature education, and experiences for family group mainly within a day or on weekends. This study suggests that the minimal area of urban recreation forest should be over 100,000$m^2$, with a facility ratio less than 20%. Building coverage should be less than 7% when the urban recreation forest is under 300,000$m^2$, less than 5% when 300,000∼500,000$m^2$, and less than 3% when over 500,000$m^2$ The limits of building height is 3 stories, or under 12m. This study finds out the character, the needs of urban recreation and the criterion for project feasibility. significance of the result is supplying theoretical basement on related regulation. Based on the results, further study will establish landscape management method and legislation & application in a detailed examination.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "자연휴양림의 성격과 개발방향" 21 (21): 135-137, 1993

      2 "리조트의 시장세분화와 포지셔닝에 관한 연구" 25 (25): 1-17, 1998

      3 "도시휴양림(안)의 개념설정과 기본구상" 경기도 2000

      4 "도시림 정비계획제도의 필요성과 창설방안" 한국임학회 46-66, 2002

      5 "도시근교림의 Recreation 기능제고를 위한 기초연구" 10 (10): 9-20, 1982

      6 "김포시 태산가족공원" (174) : 115-117, 2002.10

      7 "都市林の設計と管理" 1977

      8 "日本 札幌市에 있어서 도시근교림의 보전 관리에 관한 一考察" 13 (13): 73-81, 1995

      1 "자연휴양림의 성격과 개발방향" 21 (21): 135-137, 1993

      2 "리조트의 시장세분화와 포지셔닝에 관한 연구" 25 (25): 1-17, 1998

      3 "도시휴양림(안)의 개념설정과 기본구상" 경기도 2000

      4 "도시림 정비계획제도의 필요성과 창설방안" 한국임학회 46-66, 2002

      5 "도시근교림의 Recreation 기능제고를 위한 기초연구" 10 (10): 9-20, 1982

      6 "김포시 태산가족공원" (174) : 115-117, 2002.10

      7 "都市林の設計と管理" 1977

      8 "日本 札幌市에 있어서 도시근교림의 보전 관리에 관한 一考察" 13 (13): 73-81, 1995

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2020 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2015-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-05-20 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2000-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.74 0.74 0.78
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.76 0.74 1.022 0.14
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼