RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    제도제약하 로컬거버넌스 행위 분석 : 고양방송영상산업 클러스터 육성을 중심으로 = Action Analysis on Local Governance under Institutional Constrains : on fostering Goyang Broadcasting & Visual Industries Cluster

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103987395

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    As local governments gain the authorities and responsibilities in Decentralization & Balanced Regional Development era, the cooperative network with local community comes to the fore to solve local problems harmoniously. It is important for local government to participate, moderate, and cooperate with local communities in solving local urgent issues and policy problems. However, the various institutional constraints prevent local governance from operating itself well. The lawful constraints which can impede GoYang governance actors are Seoul Metropolitan Area Readjustment Planning Act etc. These law constraints keep laying constraints on Goyang governance actors who are trying to foster broadcasting & visual industries.
    Though local governance actors are controlled by these institutional constraints, however, they can also take initiative actions to overcome these institutional constraints. Local governance actors can elaborate four actions according to the combination by law constraints, actors' resources, autonomy, power asymmetry, and actors' attitudes as follows: firstly, 'Easygoing action' which actors do not work positively. Second, 'Ermessen der Rechtmäβigkeit action' which actors may follow inactive law application and may wait for trickling down policy by central government projects. Third, 'freies Ermessen action' which actors can make municipal ordinances and regulations for fostering industry. Fourth, 'Immersion action' which actors will bury themselves in developing industry.
    This paper can be a specific, empirical case study on new institutionalism which institution can constraint actor and vice versa. Into the bargain, as a empirical case study for local governance, it would be contribute to figuring out the local governance formation, constraints, and action.
    번역하기

    As local governments gain the authorities and responsibilities in Decentralization & Balanced Regional Development era, the cooperative network with local community comes to the fore to solve local problems harmoniously. It is important for local gove...

    As local governments gain the authorities and responsibilities in Decentralization & Balanced Regional Development era, the cooperative network with local community comes to the fore to solve local problems harmoniously. It is important for local government to participate, moderate, and cooperate with local communities in solving local urgent issues and policy problems. However, the various institutional constraints prevent local governance from operating itself well. The lawful constraints which can impede GoYang governance actors are Seoul Metropolitan Area Readjustment Planning Act etc. These law constraints keep laying constraints on Goyang governance actors who are trying to foster broadcasting & visual industries.
    Though local governance actors are controlled by these institutional constraints, however, they can also take initiative actions to overcome these institutional constraints. Local governance actors can elaborate four actions according to the combination by law constraints, actors' resources, autonomy, power asymmetry, and actors' attitudes as follows: firstly, 'Easygoing action' which actors do not work positively. Second, 'Ermessen der Rechtmäβigkeit action' which actors may follow inactive law application and may wait for trickling down policy by central government projects. Third, 'freies Ermessen action' which actors can make municipal ordinances and regulations for fostering industry. Fourth, 'Immersion action' which actors will bury themselves in developing industry.
    This paper can be a specific, empirical case study on new institutionalism which institution can constraint actor and vice versa. Into the bargain, as a empirical case study for local governance, it would be contribute to figuring out the local governance formation, constraints, and action.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "협력적 로컬거버넌스의 대두: 천안시 환경기초시설정책사례를 중심으로" 2004

    2 "제도변화의 통합적 접근: 역사적 신제도주의를 중심으로" 14 (14): 2005

    3 "제도, 제약 및 관료의 예산결정행태: 지방정부 예산결정에 대한 신제도주의적 접근" 9 (9): 2000

    4 "사회과학연구의 논리" 서울: 박영사 1989

    5 "김대중 정부의 대기업 구조조정정책 연구 -역사적 제도주의 적용-" 12 (12): 2003

    6 "금융규제 정책변동에 있어서 제도적 제약에 관한 연구" 14 (14): 2005

    7 "공식적 제도제약의 비의도적 결과: 고양시 산업육성의 법적 제약을 중심으로" 한국행정학회보 40 (40): 2006

    8 "건설교통부 홈페이지"

    9 "거버넌스의 이해" 서울: 대영문화사 2002

    10 "最新 行政法講義(上)" 서울: 박영사 2004

    1 "협력적 로컬거버넌스의 대두: 천안시 환경기초시설정책사례를 중심으로" 2004

    2 "제도변화의 통합적 접근: 역사적 신제도주의를 중심으로" 14 (14): 2005

    3 "제도, 제약 및 관료의 예산결정행태: 지방정부 예산결정에 대한 신제도주의적 접근" 9 (9): 2000

    4 "사회과학연구의 논리" 서울: 박영사 1989

    5 "김대중 정부의 대기업 구조조정정책 연구 -역사적 제도주의 적용-" 12 (12): 2003

    6 "금융규제 정책변동에 있어서 제도적 제약에 관한 연구" 14 (14): 2005

    7 "공식적 제도제약의 비의도적 결과: 고양시 산업육성의 법적 제약을 중심으로" 한국행정학회보 40 (40): 2006

    8 "건설교통부 홈페이지"

    9 "거버넌스의 이해" 서울: 대영문화사 2002

    10 "最新 行政法講義(上)" 서울: 박영사 2004

    11 "http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/~wright/Streeck.html"

    12 "and the Future of Public Law" 1988

    13 "The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France" 1986

    14 "The Game-Theoretic Revolution in Comparative and Historical Analysis, manuscript" 2002

    15 "Rethinking agency and structure in the study of regime change" New Brunswick 1999

    16 "Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change" 1999

    17 "New Institutionalism: Theory and Analysis" University Toronto Press 2005

    18 "New Concepts-Old Problems? The Institutional Constraints for the Effective Implementation of EU Environmental Policy" International Studies Association 2000

    19 "Making Local Governance Work: Network, Relationship and the Management of Change" Houndmills: Palgrave 2001

    20 "Local Governance in Britain" New York: Palgrave 2000

    21 "Limits to Local Governance" 2003

    22 "Limiting the unintended consequences of institutional change" Comparative Political Studies 2001

    23 "Journal of Economic Perspectives" 1991

    24 "Issues in Local Governance: Linking Communities and Local Governments" Local Governance(Oslo) 2003

    25 "Internationalization, institutions, and political change" New York: Cambridge University Press 1996

    26 "Institutional Constraints on Economic Reform: The Case of Investment Decisions in China" 7 (7): 1996

    27 "Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics" Cambridge University Press 1992

    28 "Governing as Governance" London: Sage Publications 2003

    29 "Governance Failure" 11 (11): 2000

    30 "Economic policy, institutions and economic growth in an Era of globalization" Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies 1998

    31 "Developments in Intergovernmental Relations: towards multi-level governance" 29 (29): 2001

    32 "Developmentalism in Brazil and Argentina" Cornell University Press 1991

    33 "Deliberate Discretion?" New York: Cambridge University Press 2002

    34 "Code is Murphy's Law" 19 (19): 2005

    35 "Change rules" The American Journal of Sociology 2001

    36 "Beneficial Constraints: Beneficial for Whom?" 1998

    37 "Argument and persuasion in the Policy Process" Yale University Press 1989

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.89 0.89 0.84
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.84 0.87 1.024 0.24
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼