통찰의 발현 기제에 대한 신형태주의 관점의 타당성 고찰 = Examining Validity of the Neo-Gestalt View for Insight Problem Solving Process

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Neo-Gestalt psychologists try to make their theory better to explain how the insight occurs adopting several principles invented by cognitive psychology camp. Despite their much efforts, I suspect the validity of their theory. This paper focused on theoretical and methodological problems resided in Neo-Gestalt view. This effort would give the chance to evaluate many programs developed based on Neo-Gestal view for enhancing creative behaviors.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

창의성 발현과정의 핵심이라고 인정되는 통찰에 대한 설명은 대부분 형태주의 관점을 기초로 제안되고 있다. 하지만 통찰을 지각의 전환으로 설명하려는 형태주의 관점은 다양한 연구자들에 의해 이론적 문제점이 제기되고 있기에, 일부 형태주의자들은 인지주의 이론을 도입함으로써 이러한 문제점들을 해결하려 노력하고 있다. 본 논문은 신형태주의로 분류되는 이러한 노력이 이론적으로 그리고 방법론적으로 또 다른 문제를 내포하고 있다는 것을 보여주고자 한다. 최근에 개발되고 유통되는 대부분의 창의성 개발 프로그램이 이러한 신형태주의의 논리를 기반으로 한다는 점에서, 본 논문에 서 제시되는 신형태주의 관점의 문제점은 현재 개발되는 프로그램의 타당성을 진지하게 고민해볼 수 있는 계기가 될 수 있을 것이다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 임웅, "통찰! 지각인가 혹은 지식인가? :인지의 하향처리과정으로서의 통찰" 한국영재교육학회 8 (8): 89-108, 2009

2 Chein, J. M., "Working memory and insight in the nine-dot problem" 38 (38): 883-892, 2010

3 Chronicle, E. P., "When insight just won't come : The failure of visual cues in the nine-dot problem" 54 (54): 903-919, 2001

4 Kotovsky, K., "What makes some problems really hard: Explorations in the problem space of difficulty" 22 (22): 143-183, 1990

5 Humphrey, G., "Thinking: An introduction to its experimental psychology" Wiley 1963

6 Fleck, J. I., "The use of verbal protocols as data: An analysis of insight in the candle problem" 32 (32): 990-1006, 2004

7 Burnham, C. A., "The nine-dot problem : Beyond perceptual organization" 17 : 321-323, 1969

8 Perkins, D. N., "The mind's best work" Harvard University Press 1981

9 Köhler, W., "The mentality of apes. New" Harcourt, Brace 1925

10 Harlow, H. F., "The formation of learning sets" 56 : 51-65, 1949

11 Holyoak, K. J., "The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning" Cambridge University Press 117-142, 2005

12 Holyoak, K. J., "Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer" 15 (15): 332-340, 1987

13 Goldstein, B., "Sensation and perception. (7th ed.)" Wadsworth Thompson 2006

14 Maier, N. R. F., "Reasoning in humansⅠ. On direction" 10 (10): 115-143, 1930

15 Gerring, R. J., "Psychology and Life." Allyn & Bacon 2002

16 Ansburg, P. I., "Promoting insightful problem solving" 34 (34): 30-60, 2000

17 Weisberg, R. W., "Prolegomena to theories of insight in problem solving: Definition of terms and a taxonomy of problems, In The nature of insight" MIT Press 157-196, 1995

18 Wertheimer, M., "Productive thinking(Enlarged ed.)" Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc 1959

19 Kershaw, T. C., "Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society" Erlbaum 489-493, 2001

20 Scheerer, M., "Problem-solving" 208 : 118-128, 1963

21 Weisberg, R. W., "Problem solving is not like perception: More on gestalt theory" 111 (111): 326-330, 1982

22 Kahney, H., "Problem Solving: Current Issues" Open University Press 1993

23 Kershaw, T. C., "Multiple causes of difficulty in insight: The case of the nine-dot problem" 30 (30): 3-13, 2004

24 Holyoak, K. J., "Mental Leap: Analogy in creative thought" MIT press 1995

25 Ohlsson, S., "Information-processing explanations of insight and related phenomena, In Advances in the psychology of thinking (Vol. 1)" Harvester Wheatsheaf 1-44, 1992

26 MacGregor, J. N., "Information processing and insight: A process model of performance on the nine-dot and related problem" 27 : 176-201, 2001

27 Newell, A., "Human problem solving" Prentice-Hall 1972

28 Ormrod, J. E., "Human Learning. (5th ed.)" Prentice Hall 2008

29 Dunbar, K., "How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories, In The Nature of insight" MIT Press 365-396, 1995

30 Weisberg, R. W., "Gestalt theory, insight, and past experience: Reply to Dominowski" 110 (110): 199-203, 1981

31 Ormerod, T. C., "Facilitation in variants of the nine-dot problem: Perceptual or cognitive mediation" 19 : 1005-, 1997

32 Lung, C. T., "Effects of strategy instructions and practice on nine-dot problem solving" 11 : 804-811, 1985

33 Ellen, P., "Direction, past experience, and hints in creative problem solving: reply to Weisberg and Alba" 111 (111): 316-325, 1982

34 Weisberg, R. W., "Creativity: Understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention, and the arts" John Wiley & Sons, Inc 2006

35 Runco, M. A., "Creativity: Theory and themes" Elsevier 2006

36 Dominowski, R. L., "Comment on “An examination of the alleged role of “fixation” in the solution several “insight” problems” by Weisberg and Alba" 110 (110): 193-198, 1981

37 Sternberg, R. J., "Cognitive psychology (3rd ed.)" Thomson Wadsworth 2003

38 Holland, J. H., "Analogy, In Induction : processes of inference, learning, and discovery" MIT Press 287-319, 1986

39 Mumford, M. D., "Analogies, In Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol.1)" Academic Press 71-77, 1999

40 Gick, M. L., "Analogical problem solving" 12 : 306-355, 1980

41 Weisberg, R. W., "An examination of the alleged role of “fixation” in the solution several “insight” problems" 110 (110): 169-192, 1981

42 Langley, P., "A computational model of scientific insight, In Handbook of creativity" Cambridge University Press 177-201, 1988