RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      상속세 및 증여세법상 비상장주식 평가방법의 타당성 = Is the Valuation Method of Unlisted Common Stock Reasonable in Korean Tax Law?

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104295582

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the valuation of stocks based on the Korean tax law is proper. Specifically, we compared the values of common stocks between the estimated values based on Korean tax law and their market price. We also investigated whether the valuation errors of common stocks were influenced by firm size. Finally, we investigated how much the effects of goodwill are in valuation based on Korean tax law. The results showed that the values based on Korean tax law were overestimated. Specifically, their market prices were 62% of their value measured by net earnings, and 74% of their value measured by net assets on average. And also their values based on Korean tax law are greater than their market price by 55% on average. These mean tax valuation method causes overstimation on average. But the level of overestimation were negatively associated with firm size. For large firms, their values estimated by Korean tax law were smaller than their market price. But for medium and small firms, it was opposite. Finally, the goodwill affect on valuation by 3.5%.<Key words> Unlisted common stock, Firm valuation
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the valuation of stocks based on the Korean tax law is proper. Specifically, we compared the values of common stocks between the estimated values based on Korean tax law and their market price. We al...

      The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the valuation of stocks based on the Korean tax law is proper. Specifically, we compared the values of common stocks between the estimated values based on Korean tax law and their market price. We also investigated whether the valuation errors of common stocks were influenced by firm size. Finally, we investigated how much the effects of goodwill are in valuation based on Korean tax law. The results showed that the values based on Korean tax law were overestimated. Specifically, their market prices were 62% of their value measured by net earnings, and 74% of their value measured by net assets on average. And also their values based on Korean tax law are greater than their market price by 55% on average. These mean tax valuation method causes overstimation on average. But the level of overestimation were negatively associated with firm size. For large firms, their values estimated by Korean tax law were smaller than their market price. But for medium and small firms, it was opposite. Finally, the goodwill affect on valuation by 3.5%.<Key words> Unlisted common stock, Firm valuation

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이은상, "현행 세법상 주식평가방법의 문제점과 개선방안" (98-03) : 1998

      2 이준규, "세법상 비상장주식에 대한 보충적 평가방법의 적정성" 한국세무학회 25 (25): 2000a

      3 김권중, "상속세법의 비상장주식 평가의 회계변수 평가모형의 유용성" 한국회계학회 23 (23): 1998

      4 이준규, "비상장주식의 평가에 있어서 회계변수평가모형의 도입 가능성" 한국세무학회 (16) : 2000b

      5 Ohlson, J, "Earnings, Book Value, and Dividends in Equity Valuation" spring1986

      6 Dechow, P, "An Empirical Assessment of the Residual Income Valuation Model" 1-34, 1999

      1 이은상, "현행 세법상 주식평가방법의 문제점과 개선방안" (98-03) : 1998

      2 이준규, "세법상 비상장주식에 대한 보충적 평가방법의 적정성" 한국세무학회 25 (25): 2000a

      3 김권중, "상속세법의 비상장주식 평가의 회계변수 평가모형의 유용성" 한국회계학회 23 (23): 1998

      4 이준규, "비상장주식의 평가에 있어서 회계변수평가모형의 도입 가능성" 한국세무학회 (16) : 2000b

      5 Ohlson, J, "Earnings, Book Value, and Dividends in Equity Valuation" spring1986

      6 Dechow, P, "An Empirical Assessment of the Residual Income Valuation Model" 1-34, 1999

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.98 0.98 1.03
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.37 1.48 1.713 0.03
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼