RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Kinetic Study of the Anaerobic Digestion of Swine Manure at Mesophilic Temperature: A Lab Scale Batch Operation = Kinetic Study of the Anaerobic Digestion of Swine Manure at Mesophilic Temperature: A Lab Scale Batch Operation

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60214807

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: The kinetic evaluation was performed for swine manure (SM) degradation and biogas generation. Methods: The SM was anaerobically digested using batch digesters at feed to inoculum ratio (F/I) of 1.0 under mesophilic conditions (36.5℃). The specific gas yield was expressed in terms of gram total chemical oxygen demand (mL/g TCOD added) and gram volatile solids added (mL/g VS added) and their effectiveness was discussed. The biogas and methane production were predicted using first order kinetic model and the modified Gompertz model. The critical hydraulic retention time for biomass washout was determined using Chen and Hashimoto model. Results: The biogas and methane yield from SM was 346 and 274 mL/ TCOD added, respectively after 100 days of digestion. The average methane content in the biogas produced from SM was 79% and H2S concentration was in the range of 3000-4108 ppm. It took around 32-47 days for 80-90% of biogas recovery and the TCOD removal from SM was calculated to be 85%. When the specific biogas and methane yield from SM (with very high TVFA concentration) was expressed in terms of oven dried volatile solids (VS) basis, the gas yield was found to be over estimated. The difference in the measured and predicted gas yield was in the range of 1.2-1.5% when using first order kinetic model and 0.1% when using modified Gompertz model. The effective time for biogas production (TEf) from SM was calculated to be in the range of 30-45 days and the critical hydraulic retention time (HRTCritical) for biomass wash out was found to be 9.5 days. Conclusions: The modified Gompertz model could be better in predicting biogas and methane production from SM. The HRT greater than 10 days is recommended for continuous digesters using SM as feedstock.
      번역하기

      Purpose: The kinetic evaluation was performed for swine manure (SM) degradation and biogas generation. Methods: The SM was anaerobically digested using batch digesters at feed to inoculum ratio (F/I) of 1.0 under mesophilic conditions (36.5℃). The s...

      Purpose: The kinetic evaluation was performed for swine manure (SM) degradation and biogas generation. Methods: The SM was anaerobically digested using batch digesters at feed to inoculum ratio (F/I) of 1.0 under mesophilic conditions (36.5℃). The specific gas yield was expressed in terms of gram total chemical oxygen demand (mL/g TCOD added) and gram volatile solids added (mL/g VS added) and their effectiveness was discussed. The biogas and methane production were predicted using first order kinetic model and the modified Gompertz model. The critical hydraulic retention time for biomass washout was determined using Chen and Hashimoto model. Results: The biogas and methane yield from SM was 346 and 274 mL/ TCOD added, respectively after 100 days of digestion. The average methane content in the biogas produced from SM was 79% and H2S concentration was in the range of 3000-4108 ppm. It took around 32-47 days for 80-90% of biogas recovery and the TCOD removal from SM was calculated to be 85%. When the specific biogas and methane yield from SM (with very high TVFA concentration) was expressed in terms of oven dried volatile solids (VS) basis, the gas yield was found to be over estimated. The difference in the measured and predicted gas yield was in the range of 1.2-1.5% when using first order kinetic model and 0.1% when using modified Gompertz model. The effective time for biogas production (TEf) from SM was calculated to be in the range of 30-45 days and the critical hydraulic retention time (HRTCritical) for biomass wash out was found to be 9.5 days. Conclusions: The modified Gompertz model could be better in predicting biogas and methane production from SM. The HRT greater than 10 days is recommended for continuous digesters using SM as feedstock.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, "VDI 4630. Fermentation of organic materials: characterization of the substrate, sampling, collection of material data, fermentation tests, In VDI Handbuch Energietechnik" Beuth Verlag GmbH 2006

      2 Hashimoto, A. G., "Thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobic fermentation of swine manure" 6 : 175-191, 1983

      3 Korea Ministry of Environment, "The state of solid waste generation and treatment in 2005"

      4 Haug, R. T., "The practical handbook of composting engineering" Lewis publisher 1993

      5 APHA, "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed" American Public Health Assoc 1998

      6 Kafle, G. K., "Sludge exchange process on two serial CSTRs anaerobic digestions: Process failure and recovery" 102 : 6815-6822, 2011

      7 Bhattarai, S., "Simulation and model validation of sheet and tube type photovoltaic thermal solar system and conventional solar collecting system in transient states" 103 : 184-193, 2012

      8 Sujala Bhattarai, "Simulation and Model Validation of a Pneumatic Conveying Drying for Wood Dust Particles" 한국농업기계학회 37 (37): 75-82, 2012

      9 Kumar, S., "Qualitative assessment of methane emission inventory from municipal solid waste disposal sites: a case study" 38 : 4921-4929, 2004

      10 JoungDu Shin, "Predicting Methane Production Potential of Anaerobic Co-digestion of Swine Manure and Food Waste" 대한환경공학회 13 (13): 93-97, 2008

      1 Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, "VDI 4630. Fermentation of organic materials: characterization of the substrate, sampling, collection of material data, fermentation tests, In VDI Handbuch Energietechnik" Beuth Verlag GmbH 2006

      2 Hashimoto, A. G., "Thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobic fermentation of swine manure" 6 : 175-191, 1983

      3 Korea Ministry of Environment, "The state of solid waste generation and treatment in 2005"

      4 Haug, R. T., "The practical handbook of composting engineering" Lewis publisher 1993

      5 APHA, "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed" American Public Health Assoc 1998

      6 Kafle, G. K., "Sludge exchange process on two serial CSTRs anaerobic digestions: Process failure and recovery" 102 : 6815-6822, 2011

      7 Bhattarai, S., "Simulation and model validation of sheet and tube type photovoltaic thermal solar system and conventional solar collecting system in transient states" 103 : 184-193, 2012

      8 Sujala Bhattarai, "Simulation and Model Validation of a Pneumatic Conveying Drying for Wood Dust Particles" 한국농업기계학회 37 (37): 75-82, 2012

      9 Kumar, S., "Qualitative assessment of methane emission inventory from municipal solid waste disposal sites: a case study" 38 : 4921-4929, 2004

      10 JoungDu Shin, "Predicting Methane Production Potential of Anaerobic Co-digestion of Swine Manure and Food Waste" 대한환경공학회 13 (13): 93-97, 2008

      11 Lo, H. M., "Modeling biogas production from organic fraction of MSW co-digested with MSWI ashes in anaerobic bioreactors" 101 : 6329-6335, 2010

      12 Richards, B. K., "Methods for kinetic analysis of methane fermentation in high solids biomass digesters" 1 (1): 65-73, 1999

      13 Hansen, T., "Method of determination of methane potentials of solid organic waste" 24 : 393-400, 2004

      14 Mohammad Nazrul Islam, "Methane Production Potential of Food Waste and Food Waste Mixture with Swine Manure in Anaerobic Digestion" 한국농업기계학회 37 (37): 100-105, 2012

      15 De Gioannis, G., "Landfill gas generation after mechanical biological treatment of municipal solid waste. Estimation of gas generation rate constants" 29 : 1026-1034, 2009

      16 Kim, D. H., "Kinetics of thermophilic anaerobic digestion and effects of propionate on thermophilic anaerobic digestion" 6 : 58-63, 2004

      17 Raposo, F., "Influence of inoculumsubstrate ratio on the anaerobic digestion of sunflower oil cake in batch mode: process stability and kinetic evaluation" 149 : 70-77, 2009

      18 Asam, Z. U. Z., "How can we improve biomethane production per unit of feedstock in biogas plants?" 88 : 2013-2018, 2011

      19 Gonzảlez-Fernảndez, C., "Evaluation of anaerobic codigestion of microalgal biomass and swine manure via response surface methodology" 88 : 3448-3453, 2011

      20 Li, C., "Evaluating and modeling biogas production from municipal fat, oil, and grease and synthetic kitchen waste in anaerobic co-digestions" 102 : 9471-9480, 2011

      21 Kreuger E, "Ensiling of crops for biogas production: effects on methane yield and total solids determination" 4 : 44-, 2011

      22 김상헌, "Effective Treatment of Swine Manure with Chinese Cabbage Silage through Two Serial Anaerobic Digestion" 한국농업기계학회 35 (35): 53-62, 2010

      23 Dίaz, J. P., "Co-digestion of different waste mixtures from agroindustrial activities: Kinetic evaluation and synergetic effects" 102 : 10834-10840, 2011

      24 EI-Mashad, H. M., "Biogas production from co-digestion of dairy manure and food waste" 101 : 4021-4028, 2010

      25 Owen, W. F., "Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicity" 13 : 485-492, 1979

      26 Kafle, G. K., "Batch anaerobic co-digestion of Kimchi factory waste silage and swine manure under mesophilic conditions" 2012

      27 Zhang, R. H., "Anaerobic treatment of swine waste by the anaerobic sequencing batch reactor" 40 (40): 761-767, 1997

      28 Zhang, L., "Anaerobic codigestion of food waste and piggery wastewater: Focusing on the role of trace elements" 102 (102): 5048-5059, 2011

      29 Gopi Krishna Kafle, "Anaerobic Digestion Treatment for the Mixture of Chinese Cabbage Waste Juice and Swine Manure" 한국농업기계학회 37 (37): 58-64, 2012

      30 Hayward, G., "A corrected method for dry matter determination for use in anaerobic digester control" 34 : 101-111, 1990

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2024 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-02-08 학술지명변경 한글명 : 바이오시스템공학 -> Journal of Biosystems Engineering KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-04-11 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국농업기계학회지 -> 바이오시스템공학 KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.15 0.15 0.15
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.14 0.2 0.323 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼