RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      해사국제사법상 편의치적에 관한 고찰

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A30066424

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Private international law or Conflict of laws can be defined as inconsistency or difference between the laws of different countries, arising in the case of persons who have acquired rights, incurred obligations, injuries or damages, or made contracts, within the territory of two or more jurisdictions. Specially the law of the ship`s nationality or the law of the flag is commonly used to apply the articles concerned in maritime field of private international law. Despite the vessel`s flag or nationality plays an important part in the choice of law problems, the theory of the law of the flag suffers from serious difficulties. For example, what law applies in cases of vessels wearing flags of convenience, or in cases of double flagging, or to collisions on the high seas between vessels of different flags? Specially I concentrated my attention on the flags of convenience, which is not the vessel`s bona fide nationality. In this case, the question of whether there exists a genuine link between a state and its flag vessels may be addressed indirectly. And the article 8 of Korean Private International Law stipulates the Exception of Choice of Law Clause, where the law of the country with which it is most closely connected is obviously existed, the legal relationship concerned is governed by the law of the country. Thus, it is essential for me to study on the constructive method of the relationship between a state and its flag vessels because the article 8 of Korean Private International Law can be applied to the flags of convenience. Therefore the writer try to describe both the flags of convenience and a genuine link between a state and its flag vessels in maritime private international law. These articles are followed by analyses concerning the lifting of the corporate veil and the piercing of the corporate veil for the purpose of grasping of the substantial incorporated entity. After considering all the factors, the use of flags of convenience can be applied to the Exception of Choice of Law Clause of Korean Private International Law. In this case, the law of the flag should be only one indicator or contact among many. It should rarely, if ever, be the sole consideration in determining the proper law of the maritime field. Thus, it is essential to think over many contacts which can be used in determining the applicable law through most significant relationship theory.
      번역하기

      Private international law or Conflict of laws can be defined as inconsistency or difference between the laws of different countries, arising in the case of persons who have acquired rights, incurred obligations, injuries or damages, or made contracts,...

      Private international law or Conflict of laws can be defined as inconsistency or difference between the laws of different countries, arising in the case of persons who have acquired rights, incurred obligations, injuries or damages, or made contracts, within the territory of two or more jurisdictions. Specially the law of the ship`s nationality or the law of the flag is commonly used to apply the articles concerned in maritime field of private international law. Despite the vessel`s flag or nationality plays an important part in the choice of law problems, the theory of the law of the flag suffers from serious difficulties. For example, what law applies in cases of vessels wearing flags of convenience, or in cases of double flagging, or to collisions on the high seas between vessels of different flags? Specially I concentrated my attention on the flags of convenience, which is not the vessel`s bona fide nationality. In this case, the question of whether there exists a genuine link between a state and its flag vessels may be addressed indirectly. And the article 8 of Korean Private International Law stipulates the Exception of Choice of Law Clause, where the law of the country with which it is most closely connected is obviously existed, the legal relationship concerned is governed by the law of the country. Thus, it is essential for me to study on the constructive method of the relationship between a state and its flag vessels because the article 8 of Korean Private International Law can be applied to the flags of convenience. Therefore the writer try to describe both the flags of convenience and a genuine link between a state and its flag vessels in maritime private international law. These articles are followed by analyses concerning the lifting of the corporate veil and the piercing of the corporate veil for the purpose of grasping of the substantial incorporated entity. After considering all the factors, the use of flags of convenience can be applied to the Exception of Choice of Law Clause of Korean Private International Law. In this case, the law of the flag should be only one indicator or contact among many. It should rarely, if ever, be the sole consideration in determining the proper law of the maritime field. Thus, it is essential to think over many contacts which can be used in determining the applicable law through most significant relationship theory.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2017-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.6 1.6 1.5
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.29 1.31 1.495 0.57
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼