RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      株主의 代表訴訟에 관한 小考 = The Protection of Minority Shareholders

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A30028593

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      It is admitted the shareholders' representative suit so as to seek their own interests in the law of a corporation in our country. But this system is being accepted significantly for the benefits of shareholder and corporation. It is also accepted in the law of England and America. This system allows the shareholders to the supervision right of their illegal acts in order to encourage their interests.
      The commercial law in our country admits shareholders' representative suit for the interests of corporation. It also includes quite a few system to prevent the abuse of lawsuit, but there are many problems unsolved. So I'm going to exhibit several reform measures as followings.
      First of all, if the shareholder of complainant institutes a lawsuit in our country, an inspector or a board of inspector should proceed the suit representing the corporation. The adjustment in this point is needed before the institution of lawsuit. Our country is admitting the system of a board of directors accepted in America. As a result, if the lawsuit committee is set up in board of directors and the qualification of member of lawsuit committee is restricted only to outside director, it is possible to reasonable and rational judgement. After all, it will be prevented that the lawsuit committee abuse the suit and institute the unreasonable suit.
      In the second way, the minority shareholders' right is admitted by our commercial law so as to abuse the lawsuit in the qualification of suitor. But it is needed that the accuser's qualification is relieved as independent shareholders' right. Moreover, a variety of scheme for institution must be arranged only if the accuser speaks for the other shareholders' interest properly and the institution of lawsuit is helpful for the benefit for corporation.
      Finally, the extent of ill will must be interpreted limitedly in the offer of security. Nowadays, if the accuser has an intention that do damage to the accused, it is interpreted as ill will in our country. However, in case of spreading of shareholders' representative suit, the management rationalization of corporation is promoted and then, the shareholder who hasn't the ability for the offer of security will do not institute the lawsuit. Therefore, the extent of ill will must be limited.
      번역하기

      It is admitted the shareholders' representative suit so as to seek their own interests in the law of a corporation in our country. But this system is being accepted significantly for the benefits of shareholder and corporation. It is also accepted in ...

      It is admitted the shareholders' representative suit so as to seek their own interests in the law of a corporation in our country. But this system is being accepted significantly for the benefits of shareholder and corporation. It is also accepted in the law of England and America. This system allows the shareholders to the supervision right of their illegal acts in order to encourage their interests.
      The commercial law in our country admits shareholders' representative suit for the interests of corporation. It also includes quite a few system to prevent the abuse of lawsuit, but there are many problems unsolved. So I'm going to exhibit several reform measures as followings.
      First of all, if the shareholder of complainant institutes a lawsuit in our country, an inspector or a board of inspector should proceed the suit representing the corporation. The adjustment in this point is needed before the institution of lawsuit. Our country is admitting the system of a board of directors accepted in America. As a result, if the lawsuit committee is set up in board of directors and the qualification of member of lawsuit committee is restricted only to outside director, it is possible to reasonable and rational judgement. After all, it will be prevented that the lawsuit committee abuse the suit and institute the unreasonable suit.
      In the second way, the minority shareholders' right is admitted by our commercial law so as to abuse the lawsuit in the qualification of suitor. But it is needed that the accuser's qualification is relieved as independent shareholders' right. Moreover, a variety of scheme for institution must be arranged only if the accuser speaks for the other shareholders' interest properly and the institution of lawsuit is helpful for the benefit for corporation.
      Finally, the extent of ill will must be interpreted limitedly in the offer of security. Nowadays, if the accuser has an intention that do damage to the accused, it is interpreted as ill will in our country. However, in case of spreading of shareholders' representative suit, the management rationalization of corporation is promoted and then, the shareholder who hasn't the ability for the offer of security will do not institute the lawsuit. Therefore, the extent of ill will must be limited.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 序說
      • Ⅱ. 法的 性質
      • Ⅲ. 外國의 立法例
      • Ⅳ. 우리 나라의 代表訴訟制度
      • Ⅴ. 結語 - 改善方案
      • Ⅰ. 序說
      • Ⅱ. 法的 性質
      • Ⅲ. 外國의 立法例
      • Ⅳ. 우리 나라의 代表訴訟制度
      • Ⅴ. 結語 - 改善方案
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.87 0.87 0.87
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.92 0.89 0.843 0.5
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼